COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:54
|
作者
Bhattacharya, Oashe [1 ]
Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher [1 ]
Shetty, Aishwarya [1 ]
Afroz, Afsana [1 ,2 ]
Billah, Baki [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 08期
关键词
COVID-19; Epidemiology; Public health; ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061477
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the vaccines' acceptance level and to find the factors influencing pregnant women's vaccination decisions, with the goal of assisting in the development of interventions and promoting more research in this area. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed. Eligibility criteria Studies providing any kind of quantitative assessment of overall COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among pregnant women in any country or region across the globe. Data extraction and synthesis The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup (sensitivity) analysis was performed to determine the overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level to understand the sources of substantial heterogeneity. Results Out of the 375 studies identified, 17 studies from four continents assessing 25 147 participants (pregnant women) were included in this study. Among the participants, only 49% (95% CI 42% to 56%, p<0.001) had COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. High-income countries (47%; 95% CI 38% to 55%, p<0.001), participants with fewer than 12 years of education (38%; 95% CI 19% to 58%, p<0.001) and multiparous women (48%; 95% CI 31% to 66%, p<0.001) had lower COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Overall heterogeneity was high (I-2 >= 98%), and publication bias was present (p<0.001). A very weak positive correlation between COVID-19 knowledge and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was observed (r=0.164; 95% CI -0.946 to 0.972; p=0.8359). Conclusion Overall, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women was low across the studies and considerably low among some specific subgroups of participants. These research findings have implications for the development of effective interventions that could increase the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level among pregnant women to attain herd immunity. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021277754.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in COVID-19 Infected Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pathirathna, Malshani L.
    Samarasekara, Buddhini P. P.
    Dasanayake, Thakshila S.
    Saravanakumar, Padmapriya
    Weerasekara, Ishanka
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (02)
  • [42] Clinical manifestations and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yee, Jeong
    Kim, Woorim
    Han, Ji Min
    Yoon, Ha Young
    Lee, Nari
    Lee, Kyung Eun
    Gwak, Hye Sun
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [43] Psychological effects caused by COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant women: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Fan, Si
    Guan, Jianping
    Cao, Li
    Wang, Manli
    Zhao, Hua
    Chen, Lili
    Yan, Lei
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 56
  • [44] Clinical manifestations and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jeong Yee
    Woorim Kim
    Ji Min Han
    Ha Young Yoon
    Nari Lee
    Kyung Eun Lee
    Hye Sun Gwak
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [45] COVID-19 in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk and prevalence of pregnancy loss
    van Baar, Janneke A. C.
    Kostova, Elena B.
    Allotey, John
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Zamora, Javier R.
    Bonet, Mercedes
    Kim, Caron Rahn
    Mofenson, Lynne M.
    Kunst, Heinke
    Khalil, Asma
    van Leeuwen, Elisabeth
    Keijzer, Julia
    Strikwerda, Marije
    Clark, Bethany
    Verschuuren, Maxime
    Coomarasamy, Arri
    Goddijn, Mariette
    van Wely, Madelon
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2024, 30 (02) : 133 - 152
  • [46] Depression in pregnant and postpartum women during COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Adrianto, Nicholas
    Caesarlia, Josephine
    Pajala, Fegita Beatrix
    [J]. OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE, 2022, 65 (04) : 287 - 302
  • [47] Laboratory Effects of COVID-19 Infection in Pregnant Women and Their Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Clark
    Chu, Haitao
    Pei, Y. Veronica
    Zhang, Jason
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 2
  • [48] COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Hesitancy among Pregnant and Lactating Women in Saudi Arabia
    AlHefdhi, Hayfa A.
    Mahmood, Syed Esam
    Alsaeedi, Manar Ahmed I.
    Alwabel, Haifa' Hisham A.
    Alshahrani, Mariam Salem
    Alshehri, Ebtihaj Yahya
    Alhamlan, Rawan Ahmed O.
    Alosaimi, Maram Nawar
    [J]. VACCINES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [49] COVID-19 vaccine and pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carbone, Luigi
    Trinchillo, Maria Giuseppina
    Di Girolamo, Raffaella
    Raffone, Antonio
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Iorio, Giuseppe Gabriele
    Gabrielli, Olimpia
    Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (03) : 651 - 661
  • [50] Mental health effect of COVID-19 pandemic among women who are pregnant and/or lactating: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Demissie, Dereje Bayissa
    Bitew, Zebenay Workneh
    [J]. SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2021, 9