Deep Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Forte, Gabriele C. [1 ]
Altmayer, Stephan [2 ]
Silva, Ricardo F. [3 ]
Stefani, Mariana T. [1 ]
Libermann, Lucas L. [1 ]
Cavion, Cesar C. [4 ]
Youssef, Ali [5 ]
Forghani, Reza [5 ]
King, Jeremy [5 ]
Mohamed, Tan-Lucien [5 ]
Andrade, Rubens G. F. [3 ,4 ]
Hochhegger, Bruno [5 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Med, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94205 USA
[3] Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Hosp Sao Lucas Pontificia, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Vale Sinos, Fac Med, BR-90470280 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Radiol, Radi & Augmented Intelligence Lab Rail, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
lung cancer; artificial intelligence; deep learning; CNN; deep learning networks; LOW-DOSE CT; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; NODULES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers14163856
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Lung cancer screening has been shown to help reduce mortality in selected populations of smokers; however, performing screening programs at a larger scale with high accuracy is still a challenge. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has been investigated to improve large scale screening. We have performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning (DL) algorithms to diagnose lung cancer. Combining six eligible studies, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of DL algorithms were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.98) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.84), respectively. Despite remaining challenges in the field, AI is likely to play an important role in disease screening in the future. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of current deep learning algorithms for the diagnosis of lung cancer. We searched major databases up to June 2022 to include studies that used artificial intelligence to diagnose lung cancer, using the histopathological analysis of true positive cases as a reference. The quality of the included studies was assessed independently by two authors based on the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Six studies were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.98) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.84), respectively. Despite the significantly high heterogeneity for sensitivity (I-2 = 94%, p < 0.01) and specificity (I-2 = 99%, p < 0.01), most of it was attributed to the threshold effect. The pooled SROC curve with a bivariate approach yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.92). The DOR for the studies was 26.7 (95% CI 19.7-36.2) and heterogeneity was 3% (p = 0.40). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that when using the summary point from the SROC, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of DL algorithms for the diagnosis of lung cancer were 93% and 68%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The value of machine learning approaches in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yiheng Shi
    Haohan Fan
    Li Li
    Yaqi Hou
    Feifei Qian
    Mengting Zhuang
    Bei Miao
    Sujuan Fei
    [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 22
  • [42] Application of machine learning for lung cancer survival prognostication-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Didier, Alexander J.
    Nigro, Anthony
    Noori, Zaid
    Omballi, Mohamed A.
    Pappada, Scott M.
    Hamouda, Danae M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 7
  • [43] Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Junjie Liu
    Jiangjie Lei
    Yuhang Ou
    Yilong Zhao
    Xiaofeng Tuo
    Baoming Zhang
    Mingwang Shen
    [J]. Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2023, 23 : 2341 - 2356
  • [44] The value of machine learning approaches in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Yiheng
    Fan, Haohan
    Li, Li
    Hou, Yaqi
    Qian, Feifei
    Zhuang, Mengting
    Miao, Bei
    Fei, Sujuan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [45] Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Junjie
    Lei, Jiangjie
    Ou, Yuhang
    Zhao, Yilong
    Tuo, Xiaofeng
    Zhang, Baoming
    Shen, Mingwang
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (06) : 2341 - 2356
  • [46] Previous Lung Diseases and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Brenner, Darren R.
    McLaughlin, John R.
    Hung, Rayjean J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (03):
  • [47] Functional Lung Imaging in Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bucknell, N.
    Hardcastle, N.
    Bressel, M.
    Hofman, M.
    Kron, T.
    Siva, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S853 - S854
  • [48] Accuracy of automated 3D cephalometric landmarks by deep learning algorithms: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Serafin, Marco
    Baldini, Benedetta
    Cabitza, Federico
    Carrafiello, Gianpaolo
    Baselli, Giuseppe
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    Sforza, Chiarella
    Caprioglio, Alberto
    Tartaglia, Gianluca M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2023, 128 (05): : 544 - 555
  • [49] Application of deep learning algorithms in automatic sonographic localization and segmentation of the median nerve: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jia-Chi
    Shu, Yi-Chung
    Lin, Che-Yu
    Wu, Wei-Ting
    Chen, Lan-Rong
    Lo, Yu-Cheng
    Chiu, Hsiao-Chi
    Ozcakar, Levent
    Chang, Ke-Vin
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 137
  • [50] Accuracy of automated 3D cephalometric landmarks by deep learning algorithms: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marco Serafin
    Benedetta Baldini
    Federico Cabitza
    Gianpaolo Carrafiello
    Giuseppe Baselli
    Massimo Del Fabbro
    Chiarella Sforza
    Alberto Caprioglio
    Gianluca M. Tartaglia
    [J]. La radiologia medica, 2023, 128 : 544 - 555