Deep Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Forte, Gabriele C. [1 ]
Altmayer, Stephan [2 ]
Silva, Ricardo F. [3 ]
Stefani, Mariana T. [1 ]
Libermann, Lucas L. [1 ]
Cavion, Cesar C. [4 ]
Youssef, Ali [5 ]
Forghani, Reza [5 ]
King, Jeremy [5 ]
Mohamed, Tan-Lucien [5 ]
Andrade, Rubens G. F. [3 ,4 ]
Hochhegger, Bruno [5 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Med, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94205 USA
[3] Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Hosp Sao Lucas Pontificia, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Vale Sinos, Fac Med, BR-90470280 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Radiol, Radi & Augmented Intelligence Lab Rail, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
lung cancer; artificial intelligence; deep learning; CNN; deep learning networks; LOW-DOSE CT; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; NODULES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers14163856
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Lung cancer screening has been shown to help reduce mortality in selected populations of smokers; however, performing screening programs at a larger scale with high accuracy is still a challenge. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has been investigated to improve large scale screening. We have performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning (DL) algorithms to diagnose lung cancer. Combining six eligible studies, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of DL algorithms were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.98) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.84), respectively. Despite remaining challenges in the field, AI is likely to play an important role in disease screening in the future. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of current deep learning algorithms for the diagnosis of lung cancer. We searched major databases up to June 2022 to include studies that used artificial intelligence to diagnose lung cancer, using the histopathological analysis of true positive cases as a reference. The quality of the included studies was assessed independently by two authors based on the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Six studies were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.98) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.84), respectively. Despite the significantly high heterogeneity for sensitivity (I-2 = 94%, p < 0.01) and specificity (I-2 = 99%, p < 0.01), most of it was attributed to the threshold effect. The pooled SROC curve with a bivariate approach yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.92). The DOR for the studies was 26.7 (95% CI 19.7-36.2) and heterogeneity was 3% (p = 0.40). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that when using the summary point from the SROC, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of DL algorithms for the diagnosis of lung cancer were 93% and 68%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Circulating tumor cells as a potential biomarker in diagnosis of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Huang
    Shi, Yan
    Huang, Jietao
    Wang, Xiaohui
    Zhang, Rui
    Chen, Hong
    [J]. CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (02): : 639 - 645
  • [32] Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chavez, Miguel A.
    Shams, Navid
    Ellington, Laura E.
    Naithani, Neha
    Gilman, Robert H.
    Steinhoff, Mark C.
    Santosham, Mathuram
    Black, Robert E.
    Price, Carrie
    Gross, Margaret
    Checkley, William
    [J]. RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2014, 15
  • [33] Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Steinfort, D. P.
    Khor, Y. H.
    Manser, R. L.
    Irving, L. B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2011, 37 (04) : 902 - 910
  • [34] Sensitivity and Safety of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Lung Cancer Diagnosis Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Folch, Erik E.
    Labarca, Gonzalo
    Ospina-Delgado, Daniel
    Kheir, Fayez
    Majid, Adnan
    Khandhar, Sandeep J.
    Mehta, Hiren J.
    Jantz, Michael A.
    Fernandez-Bussy, Sebastian
    [J]. CHEST, 2020, 158 (04) : 1753 - 1769
  • [35] Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Falk Schwendicke
    Akhilanand Chaurasia
    Lubaina Arsiwala
    Jae-Hong Lee
    Karim Elhennawy
    Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
    Flavio Demarco
    Joachim Krois
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 4299 - 4309
  • [36] Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schwendicke, Falk
    Chaurasia, Akhilanand
    Arsiwala, Lubaina
    Lee, Jae-Hong
    Elhennawy, Karim
    Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg
    Demarco, Flavio
    Krois, Joachim
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (07) : 4299 - 4309
  • [37] Deep learning for wireless capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Soffer, Shelly
    Klang, Eyal
    Shimon, Orit
    Nachmias, Noy
    Eliakim, Rami
    Ben-Horin, Shomron
    Kopylov, Uri
    Barash, Yiftach
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 92 (04) : 831 - +
  • [38] Deep learning for temporomandibular joint arthropathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rokhshad, Rata
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    Sohrabniya, Fatemeh
    Jafari, Bahare
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Tsolakis, Ioannis A.
    Ourang, Seyed AmirHossein
    Sultan, Ahmed S.
    Khawaja, Shehryar Nasir
    Bavarian, Roxanne
    Palomo, Juan Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 51 (08) : 1632 - 1644
  • [39] Deep learning for diagnosis of head and neck cancers through radiographic data: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rokhshad, Rata
    Salehi, Seyyede Niloufar
    Yavari, Amirmohammad
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Esmaeili, Mahdieh
    Manila, Nisha
    Motamedian, Saeed Reza
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    [J]. ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 40 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [40] Deep learning for diagnosis of head and neck cancers through radiographic data: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rata Rokhshad
    Seyyede Niloufar Salehi
    Amirmohammad Yavari
    Parnian Shobeiri
    Mahdieh Esmaeili
    Nisha Manila
    Saeed Reza Motamedian
    Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi
    [J]. Oral Radiology, 2024, 40 : 1 - 20