Deep Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Forte, Gabriele C. [1 ]
Altmayer, Stephan [2 ]
Silva, Ricardo F. [3 ]
Stefani, Mariana T. [1 ]
Libermann, Lucas L. [1 ]
Cavion, Cesar C. [4 ]
Youssef, Ali [5 ]
Forghani, Reza [5 ]
King, Jeremy [5 ]
Mohamed, Tan-Lucien [5 ]
Andrade, Rubens G. F. [3 ,4 ]
Hochhegger, Bruno [5 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Med, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94205 USA
[3] Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Hosp Sao Lucas Pontificia, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Vale Sinos, Fac Med, BR-90470280 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Radiol, Radi & Augmented Intelligence Lab Rail, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
lung cancer; artificial intelligence; deep learning; CNN; deep learning networks; LOW-DOSE CT; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; NODULES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers14163856
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Lung cancer screening has been shown to help reduce mortality in selected populations of smokers; however, performing screening programs at a larger scale with high accuracy is still a challenge. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has been investigated to improve large scale screening. We have performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning (DL) algorithms to diagnose lung cancer. Combining six eligible studies, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of DL algorithms were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.98) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.84), respectively. Despite remaining challenges in the field, AI is likely to play an important role in disease screening in the future. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of current deep learning algorithms for the diagnosis of lung cancer. We searched major databases up to June 2022 to include studies that used artificial intelligence to diagnose lung cancer, using the histopathological analysis of true positive cases as a reference. The quality of the included studies was assessed independently by two authors based on the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Six studies were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.98) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.84), respectively. Despite the significantly high heterogeneity for sensitivity (I-2 = 94%, p < 0.01) and specificity (I-2 = 99%, p < 0.01), most of it was attributed to the threshold effect. The pooled SROC curve with a bivariate approach yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.92). The DOR for the studies was 26.7 (95% CI 19.7-36.2) and heterogeneity was 3% (p = 0.40). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that when using the summary point from the SROC, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of DL algorithms for the diagnosis of lung cancer were 93% and 68%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sugibayashi, Takahiro
    Walston, Shannon L.
    Matsumoto, Toshimasa
    Mitsuyama, Yasuhito
    Miki, Yukio
    Ueda, Daiju
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2023, 32 (168):
  • [2] Deep Learning for the Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer in Endoscopic Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Islam, Md. Mohaimenul
    Poly, Tahmina Nasrin
    Walther, Bruno Andreas
    Yeh, Chih-Yang
    Seyed-Abdul, Shabbir
    Li, Yu-Chuan
    Lin, Ming-Chin
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [3] Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning and Radiomics in Lung Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zheng, Xiushan
    He, Bo
    Hu, Yunhai
    Ren, Min
    Chen, Zhiyuan
    Zhang, Zhiguang
    Ma, Jun
    Ouyang, Lanwei
    Chu, Hongmei
    Gao, Huan
    He, Wenjing
    Liu, Tianhu
    Li, Gang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10 : 938113
  • [4] Systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning applications in computed tomography lung cancer segmentation
    Wang, Ting -Wei
    Hong, Jia-Sheng
    Huang, Jing-Wen
    Liao, Chien -Yi
    Lu, Chia-Feng
    Wu, Yu-Te
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 197
  • [5] The value of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Mingsi
    Wu, Jinghui
    Wang, Nian
    Zhang, Xianqin
    Bai, Yujiao
    Guo, Jinlin
    Zhang, Lin
    Liu, Shulin
    Tao, Ke
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):
  • [6] The accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Cong
    Hao, Jianqi
    Hao, Xiaohu
    Xu, Wenying
    Xiao, Congjia
    Zhang, Jian
    Pu, Qiang
    Liu, Lunxu
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (08) : 3680 - 3693
  • [7] Deep learning applications for lung cancer diagnosis: A systematic review
    Hosseini, Seyed Hesamoddin
    Monsefi, Reza
    Shadroo, Shabnam
    [J]. MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 83 (05) : 14305 - 14335
  • [8] Deep learning applications for lung cancer diagnosis: A systematic review
    Seyed Hesamoddin Hosseini
    Reza Monsefi
    Shabnam Shadroo
    [J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83 : 14305 - 14335
  • [9] Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning and deep learning algorithms in the diagnosis of thoracolumbar injuries resulting in vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Beculic, Hakija
    Begagic, Emir
    Dzidic-Krivic, Amina
    Pugonja, Ragib
    Softic, Namira
    Basic, Binasa
    Balogun, Simon
    Nuhovic, Adem
    Softic, Emir
    Ljevakovic, Adnana
    Sefo, Haso
    Segalo, Sabina
    Skomorac, Rasim
    Pojskic, Mirza
    [J]. BRAIN AND SPINE, 2024, 4
  • [10] Deep learning algorithms for melanoma detection using dermoscopic images: A systematic review and meta-analysis☆
    Ye, Zichen
    Zhang, Daqian
    Zhao, Yuankai
    Chen, Mingyang
    Wang, Huike
    Seery, Samuel
    Qu, Yimin
    Xue, Peng
    Jiang, Yu
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2024, 155