SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization in Convalescent Plasma and Commercial Lots of Plasma-Derived Immunoglobulin

被引:26
|
作者
Volk, Andreas [1 ]
Covini-Souris, Caroline [2 ]
Kuehnel, Denis [1 ]
De Mey, Christian [3 ]
Roemisch, Juergen [2 ]
Schmidt, Torben [1 ]
机构
[1] Octapharma Biopharmaceut GmbH, Virus & Prion Validat, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Octapharma Pharmazeutika Prod Gesell MbH, R&D Plasma, Vienna, Austria
[3] ACPS Network GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany
关键词
THERAPY; SAFETY; VIRUS;
D O I
10.1007/s40259-021-00511-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Plain Language Summary People with deficiencies in their immune system often have an insufficient antibody response to antigens such as bacteria, viruses, or vaccines. These patients therefore often receive antibodies from healthy people to replace the missing antibodies and build a first line of defense against infections. These antibodies (also called immunoglobulins [Ig]) are prepared from plasma, the liquid fraction of the blood without cells, of healthy donors. This plasma is then split up during pharmaceutical production into its protein components. One of these is immunoglobulin G (IgG), which is the protein family that neutralizes/inactivates infectious agents as well as marks these infectious agents so they can be recognized by other parts of the immune system. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the severe to fatal outcomes for certain patient groups, especially people with impaired immunity, these patients and their physicians are interested in whether their antibody replacement therapy also confers protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. We analyzed the capability of plasma-derived Ig lots to (i) recognize SARS-CoV-2 protein by ELISA method as well as (ii) neutralize SARS-CoV-2 by neutralization studies using the actual virus under biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) conditions. Here we show increasing anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity over time of manufactured Ig lots produced between December 2020 and June 2021. The most recent lots had a neutralizing activity of up to 864 IU/mL. Considering that the US represents Octapharma's main plasma source, the progress in vaccination levels together with the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic in this country suggests that the intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IVIG/SCIG) neutralization capacities against SARS-CoV-2 might still increase and could potentially reach a level where antibody plasma concentrations in the patient confer immune protection. Introduction Patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiency (PID or SID) face increased insecurity and discomfort in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic, not knowing if and to what extent their comorbidities may impact the course of a potential SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, recently available vaccination options might not be amenable or effective for all patients in this heterogeneous population. Therefore, these patients often rely on passive immunization with plasma-derived, intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IVIG/SCIG). Whether the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and/or the progress in vaccination programs lead to increased and potentially protective titers in plasma-derived immunoglobulins (Ig) indicated (e.g., for humoral immunodeficiency) remains a pressing question for this patient population. Purpose We investigated SARS-CoV-2 reactivity of US plasma-derived IVIG/SCIG products from the end of 2020 until June 2021 as well as in convalescent plasma (CP) from May 2020 to August 2020 to determine whether potentially neutralizing antibody titers may be present. Methods Final containers of IVIG/SCIG and CP donations were analyzed by commercial ELISA for anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG as well as microneutralization assay using a patient-derived SARS-CoV-2 (D614G) isolate. Neutralization capacities of 313 single plasma donations and 119 plasma-derived IVIG/SCIG lots were determined. Results obtained from both analytical methods were normalized against the WHO International Standard. Finally, based on dense pharmacokinetic profiles of an IVIG preparation from previously published investigations, possible steady-state plasma levels of SARS-CoV-2 neutralization capacities were approximated based on currently measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 potencies in IVIG/SCIG preparations. Results CP donations presented with high variability with regards to anti-SARS-CoV-2 reactivity in ELISA as well as in neutralization testing. While approximately 50% of convalescent donations were not/low neutralizing, approximately 10% were at or above 600 IU/mL. IVIG/SCIG lots derived from pre-pandemic plasma donations did not show neutralizing capacities for SARS-CoV-2. Lots produced between December 2020 and June 2021 entailing plasma donations after the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 showed a rapid and constant increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 reactivity and neutralization capacity over time. While lot-to-lot variability was substantial, neutralization capacity increased from a mean of 21 IU/mL in December 2020 to 506 IU/mL in June 2021 with a maximum of 864 IU/mL for the most recent lots. Pharmacokinetic extrapolations, based on non-compartmental superposition principles using steady-state reference profiles from previously published pharmacokinetic investigations on IVIG in PID, yielded potential steady-state trough plasma levels of 16 IU/mL of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 IgG based on the average final container concentration from May 2021 of 216 IU/mL. Maximum extrapolated trough levels could reach 64 IU/mL based on the latest maximal final container potency tested in June 2021. Conclusions SARS-CoV-2 reactivity and neutralization capacity in IVIG/SCIG produced from US plasma rapidly and in part exponentially increased in the first half of 2021. The observed increase of final container potencies is likely trailing the serological status of the US donor population in terms of COVID-19 convalescence and vaccination by at least 5 months due to production lead times and should in principle continue at least until Fall 2021. In summary, the data support rapidly increasing levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in IVIG/SCIG products, implicating that a certain level of protection could be possible against COVID-19 for regularly substituted PID/SID patients. Nevertheless, more research is still needed to confirm which plasma levels are needed to provide protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in immune-compromised patients.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 53
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decrease in serum antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent plasma donors over time
    Prus, Kristina
    Alquist, Caroline R.
    Cancelas, Jose A.
    Oh, David
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2021, 61 (02) : 651 - 654
  • [42] SARS-CoV-2 viral load and antibody responses: the case for convalescent plasma therapy
    Casadevall, Arturo
    Joyner, Michael J.
    Pirofski, Liise-anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2020, 130 (10): : 5112 - 5114
  • [43] Major role of IgM in the neutralizing activity of convalescent plasma against SARS-CoV-2
    Gasser, Romain
    Cloutier, Marc
    Prevost, Jeremie
    Fink, Corby
    Ducas, Eric
    Ding, Shilei
    Dussault, Nathalie
    Landry, Patricia
    Tremblay, Tony
    Laforce-Lavoie, Audrey
    Lewin, Antoine
    Beaudoin-Bussieres, Guillaume
    Laumaea, Annemarie
    Medjahed, Halima
    Larochelle, Catherine
    Richard, Jonathan
    Dekaban, Gregory A.
    Dikeakos, Jimmy D.
    Bazin, Renee
    Finzi, Andres
    [J]. CELL REPORTS, 2021, 34 (09):
  • [44] Intranasal administration of convalescent plasma protects against SARS-CoV-2 infection in hamsters
    Wouters, Elise
    Verbrugghe, Caro
    Abdelnabi, Rana
    Devloo, Rosalie
    De Clippel, Dorien
    Jochmans, Dirk
    De Bleser, Dominique
    Weynand, Birgit
    Compernolle, Veerle
    Neyts, Johan
    Feys, Hendrik B.
    [J]. EBIOMEDICINE, 2023, 92
  • [45] Structural basis for the neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by an antibody from a convalescent patient
    Daming Zhou
    Helen M. E. Duyvesteyn
    Cheng-Pin Chen
    Chung-Guei Huang
    Ting-Hua Chen
    Shin-Ru Shih
    Yi-Chun Lin
    Chien-Yu Cheng
    Shu-Hsing Cheng
    Yhu-Chering Huang
    Tzou-Yien Lin
    Che Ma
    Jiandong Huo
    Loic Carrique
    Tomas Malinauskas
    Reinis R. Ruza
    Pranav N. M. Shah
    Tiong Kit Tan
    Pramila Rijal
    Robert F. Donat
    Kerry Godwin
    Karen R. Buttigieg
    Julia A. Tree
    Julika Radecke
    Neil G. Paterson
    Piyada Supasa
    Juthathip Mongkolsapaya
    Gavin R. Screaton
    Miles W. Carroll
    Javier Gilbert-Jaramillo
    Michael L. Knight
    William James
    Raymond J. Owens
    James H. Naismith
    Alain R. Townsend
    Elizabeth E. Fry
    Yuguang Zhao
    Jingshan Ren
    David I. Stuart
    Kuan-Ying A. Huang
    [J]. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2020, 27 : 950 - 958
  • [46] SARS-CoV-2 and Plasma Hypercoagulability
    Steadman, Elisabeth
    Fandaros, Marina
    Yin, Wei
    [J]. CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOENGINEERING, 2021, 14 (05) : 513 - 522
  • [47] SARS-CoV-2 and Plasma Hypercoagulability
    Elisabeth Steadman
    Marina Fandaros
    Wei Yin
    [J]. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 2021, 14 : 513 - 522
  • [48] Convalescent plasma anti SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ectodomain and receptor-binding domain IgG correlate with virus neutralization
    Salazar, Eric
    Kuchipudi, Suresh V.
    Christensen, Paul A.
    Eagar, Todd
    Yi, Xin
    Zhao, Picheng
    Jin, Zhicheng
    Long, S. Wesley
    Olsen, Randall J.
    Chen, Jian
    Castillo, Brian
    Leveque, Christopher
    Towers, Dalton
    Lavinder, Jason
    Gollihar, Jimmy
    Cardona, Jose
    Ippolito, Gregory
    Nissly, Ruth
    Bird, Ian
    Greenawalt, Denver
    Rossi, Randall M.
    Gontu, Abhinay
    Srinivasan, Sreenidhi
    Poojary, Indira
    Cattadori, Isabella M.
    Hudson, Peter J.
    Josleyn, Nicole M.
    Prugar, Laura
    Huie, Kathleen
    Herbert, Andrew
    Bernard, David W.
    Dye, John M.
    Kapur, Vivek
    Musser, James M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2020, 130 (12): : 6728 - 6738
  • [49] Impact of plasma collection date on antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in intravenous immunoglobulin
    Paddick, Martyn
    Pun, Ramesh
    Clark, Kim
    [J]. CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 262