Risk-Based Multilevel Methodology to Stress Test Critical Infrastructure Systems

被引:20
|
作者
Esposito, Simona [1 ,2 ]
Stojadinovic, Bozidar [2 ]
Babic, Anze [3 ]
Dolsek, Matjaz [3 ]
Iqbal, Sarfraz [4 ,5 ]
Selva, Jacopo [5 ]
Broccardo, Marco [6 ]
Mignan, Arnaud [7 ]
Giardini, Domenico [7 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Re Management Ltd, Mythcnquai 50-60, CH-8022 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Struct Engn, Stefano Franscini Pl 5, CH-8093 Ziirich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Civil & Geodet Engn, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[4] Linnaeus Univ, Fac Technol, S-3041 Vaxjo, Sweden
[5] Ist Nazl Geofis & Vulcanol, Sez Bologna, I-40100 Bologna, Italy
[6] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Swiss Competence Ctr Energy Res, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[7] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Geophys, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Critical infrastructure systems; Stress test; Natural hazards; Multilevel; Penalty system; Grading system; LOGIC TREES; TERM;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000520
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Making communities safer requires better tools to identify, quantify, and manage risks. Among the most important tools are stress tests, originally designed to test the risk posed by nuclear power plants. A complementary harmonized multilevel stress test for nonnuclear civil infrastructure systems against natural hazards is proposed. Each stress test level is characterized by a different scope and a different level of risk analysis complexity to suit different civil infrastructure systems, different hazards, and different risks. The stress test consists of the following phases. First, the goals and the methods for the risk analysis are defined. The test is then performed at the component and system levels, followed by a verification of the findings. A penalty system is defined to adjust the output of the risk assessment according to the limitations of the risk analysis methods used. The adjusted risk assessment results are then passed to a grading system to determine the outcome of the stress test. Finally, the risk assessment results are reported, and the stress test outcomes are communicated to stakeholders and authorities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A METHODOLOGY FOR RISK-BASED EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNING
    TOUCHTON, RA
    POTTER, TE
    SAUTER, GD
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1985, 50 (NOV): : 362 - 363
  • [42] Critical success factors of risk-based inspection
    Mohamed, Ramuna
    Hassan, Che Rosmani Che
    Hamid, Mahar Diana
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2019, 38 (01) : 4 - 20
  • [43] Development of Risk-Based Bridge Maintenance Prioritization Methodology
    Dongjin Kim
    Yongjun Lee
    Min-jae Lee
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22 : 3718 - 3725
  • [44] Risk-based Vulnerability Assessment Methodology for Petrochemical Plant
    Shi, Chao
    Chen, Wentao
    Wu, Zongzhi
    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2009, : 326 - +
  • [45] Technology Considerations to Enable the Risk-Based Monitoring Methodology
    Shelly Barnes
    Nareen Katta
    Neil Sanford
    Thomas Staigers
    Thomas Verish
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2014, 48 : 536 - 545
  • [46] Risk-Based Methodology for Evaluation of Bioinfiltration Design and Performance
    Lewellyn, Conor
    Wadzuk, Bridget
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE WATER IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [47] Risk-based methodology for scour analysis at bridge foundations
    Bento, Ana Margarida
    Gomes, Andreia
    Viseu, Teresa
    Couto, Lucia
    Pego, Joao Pedro
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 223
  • [48] Development of Risk-Based Bridge Maintenance Prioritization Methodology
    Kim, Dongjin
    Lee, Yongjun
    Lee, Min-jae
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (10) : 3718 - 3725
  • [49] Development of a Risk-based Methodology for Rock Slope Analysis
    Mahsa Moghadami
    Ali Mortazavi
    International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 16 : 1317 - 1328
  • [50] Risk-based sequential allocation of competing sanitation infrastructure investments
    Louis, Garrick E.
    Magpili, Luna M.
    Pinto, C. Ariel
    International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 2012, 10 (2-3) : 256 - 268