Risk-Based Multilevel Methodology to Stress Test Critical Infrastructure Systems

被引:20
|
作者
Esposito, Simona [1 ,2 ]
Stojadinovic, Bozidar [2 ]
Babic, Anze [3 ]
Dolsek, Matjaz [3 ]
Iqbal, Sarfraz [4 ,5 ]
Selva, Jacopo [5 ]
Broccardo, Marco [6 ]
Mignan, Arnaud [7 ]
Giardini, Domenico [7 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Re Management Ltd, Mythcnquai 50-60, CH-8022 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Struct Engn, Stefano Franscini Pl 5, CH-8093 Ziirich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Civil & Geodet Engn, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[4] Linnaeus Univ, Fac Technol, S-3041 Vaxjo, Sweden
[5] Ist Nazl Geofis & Vulcanol, Sez Bologna, I-40100 Bologna, Italy
[6] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Swiss Competence Ctr Energy Res, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[7] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Geophys, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Critical infrastructure systems; Stress test; Natural hazards; Multilevel; Penalty system; Grading system; LOGIC TREES; TERM;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000520
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Making communities safer requires better tools to identify, quantify, and manage risks. Among the most important tools are stress tests, originally designed to test the risk posed by nuclear power plants. A complementary harmonized multilevel stress test for nonnuclear civil infrastructure systems against natural hazards is proposed. Each stress test level is characterized by a different scope and a different level of risk analysis complexity to suit different civil infrastructure systems, different hazards, and different risks. The stress test consists of the following phases. First, the goals and the methods for the risk analysis are defined. The test is then performed at the component and system levels, followed by a verification of the findings. A penalty system is defined to adjust the output of the risk assessment according to the limitations of the risk analysis methods used. The adjusted risk assessment results are then passed to a grading system to determine the outcome of the stress test. Finally, the risk assessment results are reported, and the stress test outcomes are communicated to stakeholders and authorities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk-based investment allocation for infrastructure networks
    Kunttu, S.
    Valisalo, T.
    Pirttimaki, J.
    RISK, RELIABILITY AND SAFETY: INNOVATING THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, : 526 - 531
  • [22] Qualifying network infrastructure - A risk-based approach
    Winter, W
    Huber, L
    BIOPHARM INTERNATIONAL-THE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT, 2004, : S28 - S31
  • [23] Stress-test the resilience of critical infrastructure
    Linkov, Igor
    NATURE, 2022, 603 (7902) : 578 - 578
  • [24] Stress-test the resilience of critical infrastructure
    Igor Linkov
    Benjamin Trump
    Joshua Trump
    Gianluca Pescaroli
    Aleksandrina Mavrodieva
    Abhilash Panda
    Nature, 2022, 603 : 578 - 578
  • [25] Economic Impacts of Rules-versus Risk-Based Cybersecurity Regulations for Critical Infrastructure Providers
    Massacci, Fabio
    Ruprai, Raminder
    Collinson, Matthew
    Williams, Julian
    IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2016, 14 (03) : 52 - 60
  • [26] A new methodology for risk-based availability analysis
    Khan, Faisal I.
    Haddara, Mahmoud
    KrIshnasamy, Loganathan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2008, 57 (01) : 103 - 112
  • [27] Advances in Data-Driven Risk-Based Performance Assessment of Structures and Infrastructure Systems
    Feng, De-Cheng
    Li, Yue
    Shafieezadeh, Abdollah
    Taciroglu, Ertugrul
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 149 (05)
  • [28] An applied complex systems framework for risk-based decision-making in infrastructure engineering
    Gomez, C.
    Sanchez-Silva, M.
    Duenas-Osorio, L.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2014, 50 : 66 - 77
  • [29] Risk-Based Model for Pricing Highway Infrastructure Warranties
    Gharaibeh, Nasir G.
    Shirazi, Hamid
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2009, 15 (04) : 378 - 382
  • [30] Activity and Information Infrastructure for Risk-Based Process Design
    Kikuchi, Yasunori
    Hirao, Masahiko
    10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2009, 27 : 1023 - 1028