Effect of targeted biopsy guided by elastic image fusion of MRI with 3D-TRUS on diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer

被引:23
|
作者
Baco, Eduard [1 ]
Rud, Erik [2 ]
Ukimura, Osamu [1 ]
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana [3 ]
Svindland, Aud [3 ]
Matsugasumi, Toru [1 ]
Bernhard, Jean-Christophe [4 ]
Rewcastle, John C. [1 ]
Eggesbo, Heidi B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, USC Inst Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Oslo Univ Hosp Aker, Dept Radiol, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Norwegian Radium Hosp, Dept Pathol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Bordeaux 1, Chirurg Urol & Transplantat Renale CHU Bordeaux, INSERM U1029, F-33405 Talence, France
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Transrectal ultrasound; Elastic image fusion; Targeted prostate biopsy; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE; FEATURES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.07.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of targeted biopsy (TB) with elastic fused magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound (3D-TRUS) guidance in the diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer (APCa). Material and method: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent TB with elastic fused MRI/3D-TRUS guidance using a 1.5-T MRI with T2- and diffusion-weighted images. APCa was defined as TB-proven cancer whose MR-imaged center was located anteriorly according to standardized MRI reporting schema. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System was used to quantify MRI suspicion. Maximum cancer core length (MCCL), cancer core involvement, primary Gleason grade pattern, and Gleason score (GS) on TB were assessed. A clinically significant cancer on TB was MCCL >= 5 mm of GS 6 or any cancer with GS >= 7. Agreement between TB and radical prostatectomy step sections was assessed for all subjects when possible. Results: A total of 211 consecutive subjects were included. APCa was found in 81% (170/211). Median (range) of TB per patient, MCCL, and cancer core involvement were 2 (1-5), 10 mm (4-23), and 57% (10%-100%), respectively. According to the level of MRI suspicion, positive rate for any cancer vs. clinically significant cancer was 96% (114/119) vs. 86% (102/119) for highly suspicious, 80% (46/57) vs. 68% (39/57) for likely, and 29% (10/35) vs. 20% (7/35) for equivocal, respectively (P = 0.016 and <0.001). Step-section analysis was possible for 70 patients. Concordance of primary Gleason grade pattern and GS between TB and radical prostatectomy was 90% (kappa = 0.7) and 77% (kappa = 0.64), respectively. Conclusion: TB with elastic fused MRI/3D-TRUS guidance significantly enhanced accuracy in diagnosing clinically significant APCa. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1307
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior prostate cancer: gleason score based on MRI/TRUS elastic image fusion guided prostate biopsy vs prostatectomy
    Baco, Eduard
    Rud, Erik
    Svindland, Aud
    Eggesbo, Heidi B.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 47 : 15 - 15
  • [2] Multiparametric MRI and MRI/TRUS Fusion Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Kesch, Claudia
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja
    Bonekamp, David
    Hadaschik, Boris Alexander
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    MOLECULAR & DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES, 2019, 1126 : 87 - 98
  • [3] Evaluation of intersession 3D-TRUS to 3D-TRUS image registration for repeat prostate biopsies
    Karnik, V. V.
    Fenster, A.
    Bax, J.
    Romagnoli, C.
    Ward, A. D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (04) : 1832 - 1843
  • [4] Evaluation of Inter-session 3D-TRUS to 3D-TRUS Image Registration for Repeat Prostate Biopsies
    Karnik, Vaishali V.
    Fenster, Aaron
    Bax, Jeff
    Gardi, Lori
    Gyacskov, Igor
    Montreuil, Jacques
    Romagnoli, Cesare
    Ward, Aaron D.
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2010, PT II,, 2010, 6362 : 17 - +
  • [5] Elastic image registration of MR/TRUS for targeted prostate biopsy
    Gao, Jian
    Zhou, Fugen
    Liu, Bo
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL IMAGING PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING (ICMIPE), 2013, : 245 - 249
  • [6] Toward 3D-TRUS image-guided interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Knoth, Johannes
    Nesvacil, Nicole
    Sturdza, Alina
    Kronreif, Gernot
    Widder, Joachim
    Kirisits, Christian
    Schmid, Maximilian Paul
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2022, 21 (02) : 186 - 192
  • [7] The role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Benelli, Andrea
    Vaccaro, Chiara
    Guzzo, Sonia
    Nedbal, Carlotta
    Varca, Virginia
    Gregori, Andrea
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [8] Evaluation of MRI-TRUS Fusion Versus Cognitive Registration Accuracy for MRI-Targeted, TRUS-Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Cool, Derek W.
    Zhang, Xuli
    Romagnoli, Cesare
    Izawa, Jonathan I.
    Romano, Walter M.
    Fenster, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [9] Analysis of the cause of missed diagnosis in mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided targeted prostate biopsy
    Zhang, Fan
    Zhang, Shun
    Huang, Haifeng
    Zhang, Qing
    Zhang, Shengjie
    Zhang, Shiwei
    Guo, Hongqian
    BMC UROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] Analysis of the cause of missed diagnosis in mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided targeted prostate biopsy
    Fan Zhang
    Shun Zhang
    Haifeng Huang
    Qing Zhang
    Shengjie Zhang
    Shiwei Zhang
    Hongqian Guo
    BMC Urology, 22