Toward 3D-TRUS image-guided interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Knoth, Johannes [1 ]
Nesvacil, Nicole [1 ]
Sturdza, Alina [1 ]
Kronreif, Gernot [2 ]
Widder, Joachim [1 ]
Kirisits, Christian [1 ]
Schmid, Maximilian Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Austrian Ctr Med Innovat & Technol, Wr Neustadt, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Cervical cancer; Image guidance; Trus and/or interstitial brachytherapy; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY; ELECTROMAGNETIC TRACKING; CATHETER RECONSTRUCTION; MRI; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2021.10.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To qualitatively and quantitatively analyze needle visibility in combined intracavitary and interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy on 3D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in comparison to gold standard MRI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Image acquisition was done with a customized TRUS stepper unit and software (Medcom, Germany; Elekta, Sweden; ACMIT, Austria) followed by an MRI on the same day with the applicator in place. Qualitative assessment was done with following scoring system: 0 = no visibility 1 (= poor), 2 (= fair), 3 (= excellent) discrimination, quantitative assessment was done by measuring the distance between each needle and the tandem two centimeters (cm) above the ring and comparing to the respective measurement on MRI. RESULTS: Twenty-nine implants and a total of 188 needles (132 straight, 35 oblique, 21 free-hand) were available. Overall, 79% were visible (87% straight, 51% oblique, 76% free-hand). Mean visibility score was 1.4 +/- 0.5 for all visible needles. Distance of the visible needles to tandem was mean +/- standard deviation (SD) 21.3 millimeters (mm) +/- 6.5 mm on MRI and 21.0 mm +/- 6.4 mm on TRUS, respectively. Difference between MRI and TRUS was max 14 mm, mean +/- SD -0.3 mm +/- 2.6 mm 11% differed more than 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Straight needles were better detectable than oblique needles (87% vs. 51%). Detectability was impaired by insufficient rotation of the TRUS probe, poor image quality or anatomic variation. As needles show a rather indistinct signal on TRUS, online detection with a standardized imaging protocol in combination with tracking should be investigated, aiming at the development of real time image guidance and online treatment planning. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Brachytherapy Society.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 192
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of interstitial needles with 3D-TRUS in cervical cancer brachytherapy
    Knoth, J.
    Nesvacil, N.
    Sturdza, A.
    Kronreif, G.
    Widder, J.
    Kirisits, C.
    Schmid, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 158 : S106 - S106
  • [2] Image-guided intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer
    Chitmanee, P.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1929 - S1930
  • [3] Evaluation of intersession 3D-TRUS to 3D-TRUS image registration for repeat prostate biopsies
    Karnik, V. V.
    Fenster, A.
    Bax, J.
    Romagnoli, C.
    Ward, A. D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (04) : 1832 - 1843
  • [4] Comparison of MRI, TRUS and CT for target definition in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervical cancer
    Schmid, M.
    Nesvacil, N.
    Poetter, R.
    Berger, D.
    Sturdza, A.
    Kirisits, C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S142 - S142
  • [5] Image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients using intracavitary and interstitial implants
    Knutsen, B.
    Djupvik, L. H.
    Bruheim, K.
    Nakken, E.
    Skipar, K.
    Sundfor, K.
    Hellebust, T. P.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S102 - S102
  • [6] Image-guided brachytherapy effective for cervical cancer
    Tanday, Sanjay
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07): : E256 - E256
  • [7] Image-guided radiotherapy and -brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Dutta, Suresh
    Nam Phong Nguyen
    Vock, Jacqueline
    Kerr, Christine
    Godinez, Juan
    Bose, Satya
    Jang, Siyoung
    Chi, Alexander
    Almeida, Fabio
    Woods, William
    Desai, Anand
    David, Rick
    Karlsson, Ulf Lennart
    Altdorfer, Gabor
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5
  • [8] Image-Guided Gynecologic Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer
    Fields, Emma C.
    Hazel, Sarah
    Morcos, Marc
    Schmidt, Ehud J.
    Chargari, Cyrus
    Viswanathan, Akila N.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 16 - 28
  • [9] Hybrid TRUS/CT with optical tracking for target delineation in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Smet, Stephanie
    Nesvacil, Nicole
    Knoth, Johannes
    Sturdza, Alina
    Najjari-Jamal, Dina
    Jelinek, Filip
    Kronreif, Gernot
    Poetter, Richard
    Widder, Joachim
    Kirisits, Christian
    Schmid, Maximilian P.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2020, 196 (11) : 983 - 992
  • [10] Hybrid TRUS/CT with optical tracking for target delineation in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Stéphanie Smet
    Nicole Nesvacil
    Johannes Knoth
    Alina Sturdza
    Dina Najjari-Jamal
    Filip Jelinek
    Gernot Kronreif
    Richard Pötter
    Joachim Widder
    Christian Kirisits
    Maximilian P. Schmid
    [J]. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2020, 196 : 983 - 992