Effect of targeted biopsy guided by elastic image fusion of MRI with 3D-TRUS on diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer

被引:23
|
作者
Baco, Eduard [1 ]
Rud, Erik [2 ]
Ukimura, Osamu [1 ]
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana [3 ]
Svindland, Aud [3 ]
Matsugasumi, Toru [1 ]
Bernhard, Jean-Christophe [4 ]
Rewcastle, John C. [1 ]
Eggesbo, Heidi B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, USC Inst Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Oslo Univ Hosp Aker, Dept Radiol, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Norwegian Radium Hosp, Dept Pathol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Bordeaux 1, Chirurg Urol & Transplantat Renale CHU Bordeaux, INSERM U1029, F-33405 Talence, France
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Transrectal ultrasound; Elastic image fusion; Targeted prostate biopsy; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE; FEATURES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.07.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of targeted biopsy (TB) with elastic fused magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound (3D-TRUS) guidance in the diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer (APCa). Material and method: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent TB with elastic fused MRI/3D-TRUS guidance using a 1.5-T MRI with T2- and diffusion-weighted images. APCa was defined as TB-proven cancer whose MR-imaged center was located anteriorly according to standardized MRI reporting schema. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System was used to quantify MRI suspicion. Maximum cancer core length (MCCL), cancer core involvement, primary Gleason grade pattern, and Gleason score (GS) on TB were assessed. A clinically significant cancer on TB was MCCL >= 5 mm of GS 6 or any cancer with GS >= 7. Agreement between TB and radical prostatectomy step sections was assessed for all subjects when possible. Results: A total of 211 consecutive subjects were included. APCa was found in 81% (170/211). Median (range) of TB per patient, MCCL, and cancer core involvement were 2 (1-5), 10 mm (4-23), and 57% (10%-100%), respectively. According to the level of MRI suspicion, positive rate for any cancer vs. clinically significant cancer was 96% (114/119) vs. 86% (102/119) for highly suspicious, 80% (46/57) vs. 68% (39/57) for likely, and 29% (10/35) vs. 20% (7/35) for equivocal, respectively (P = 0.016 and <0.001). Step-section analysis was possible for 70 patients. Concordance of primary Gleason grade pattern and GS between TB and radical prostatectomy was 90% (kappa = 0.7) and 77% (kappa = 0.64), respectively. Conclusion: TB with elastic fused MRI/3D-TRUS guidance significantly enhanced accuracy in diagnosing clinically significant APCa. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1307
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiparametric MRI fusion-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Kesch, Claudia
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja
    Bonekamp, David
    Hadaschik, Boris Alexander
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan P.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 172 - 177
  • [22] Role of MRI in diagnosis of prostate cancer and correlation of results with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy “TRUS”
    Islam Hussien Abd Elaziz Ahmed
    Hend Galal Eldeen Mohamed Ali Hassan
    Mohamed El Gharib Abo ElMaaty
    Shaima El Metwally ElDaisty El Metwally
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 53
  • [23] Re: Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: MRI/TRUS Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy
    Villers, Arnauld
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1218 - 1219
  • [24] Role of MRI in diagnosis of prostate cancer and correlation of results with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy "TRUS"
    Ahmed, Islam Hussien Abd Elaziz
    Mohamed Ali Hassan, Hend Galal Eldeen
    Abo ElMaaty, Mohamed El Gharib
    ElDaisty El Metwally, Shaima El Metwally
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 53 (01):
  • [25] MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate: Quality of image fusion in a clinical setting
    Schlenker, B.
    Apfelbeck, M.
    Buchner, A.
    Stief, C.
    Clevert, D-A
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2018, 70 (04) : 433 - 440
  • [26] ROLE OF SIMULTANEOUS TRUS GUIDED RANDOM BIOPSY IN MEN WITH UNILATERAL CANCER SUSPICIOUS REGIONS UNDERGOING MRI-US FUSION TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Bryk, Darren J.
    Llukani, Elton
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Huang, William C.
    Lepor, Herbert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E160 - E160
  • [27] Development of a transperineal prostate biopsy robot guided by MRI-TRUS image
    Wang, Weirong
    Pan, Bo
    Fu, Yili
    Liu, Yanjie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (04):
  • [28] Realtime TRUS/MRI Fusion Targeted-Biopsy for Prostate Cancer: A Clinical Demonstration of Increased Positive Biopsy Rates
    Kadoury, Samuel
    Yan, Pingkun
    Xu, Sheng
    Glossop, Neil
    Choyke, Peter
    Turkbey, Bans
    Pinto, Peter
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Kruecker, Jochen
    PROSTATE CANCER IMAGING: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PROGNOSIS, AND INTERVENTION, 2010, 6367 : 52 - +
  • [29] PET/MRI/TRUS image fusion guided prostate biopsy: development of a research platform and initial clinical results
    Frisch, Benjamin
    Storz, Enno
    Zettinig, Oliver
    Shah, Amit
    Kuebler, Hubert
    Navab, Nassir
    Wester, Hans
    Schwaiger, Markus
    Eiber, Matthias
    Maurer, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03)
  • [30] MRI-TARGETED TRUS-GUIDED TRANSPERINEAL FUSION BIOPSY IS SIGNIFICANTLY SUPERIOR TO SYSTEMATIC TRANSRECTAL TRUS-BIOPSY
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Zastrow, Stefan
    Huber, Johannes
    Froehner, Michael
    Wirth, Manfred
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E748 - E748