Pregnancy outcomes of single cleavage-stage embryo transfer by using Time-lapse imaging do not differ from single blastocyst transfer

被引：0
|
作者：
Wang, S. [1 ]
Zhao, X. [1 ]
Ni, X. [1 ]
Yan, G. [1 ]
Sun, H. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Affiliated Drum Tower Hosp, Reprod Med Ctr, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源：
HUMAN REPRODUCTION | 2016年 / 31卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
O-223
引用
收藏
页码：95 / 96
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Perinatal outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer following blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared to those of cleavage-stage embryo transfer: analysis of 9408 singleton newborns using propensity score analysis
    Zhong HuCen
    Wan Qi
    Hu YuLing
    Li Tian
    Huang LiJuan
    Wang Mao
    Hu XinYue
    Wang MengDi
    Zhong ZhaoHui
    [J]. 生殖与发育医学（英文）, 2024, 08 (02)
  • [42] A simple, hierarchical model combining cleavage- and blastocyst-stage time-lapse variables successfully predicts live birth following vitrified-warmed single embryo transfer
    Sugimoto, T.
    Bodri, D.
    Serna, J. Yao
    Kato, R.
    Kawachiya, S.
    Matsumoto, T.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 193 - 193
  • [43] Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in blastocyst-stage biopsy with frozen embryo transfer and cleavage-stage biopsy with fresh embryo transfer after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening
    Jing, Shuang
    Luo, Keli
    He, Hui
    Lu, Changfu
    Zhang, Shuoping
    Tan, Yueqiu
    Gong, Fei
    Lu, Guangxiu
    Lin, Ge
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (01) : 105 - +
  • [44] Clinical pregnancy outcomes between cleavage stage embryo and blastocyst in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles
    Lee, H.
    Lee, S.
    Park, D.
    Kang, H.
    Lim, C.
    Yang, K.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [45] Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results
    S. Fernández-Shaw
    R. Cercas
    C. Braña
    C. Villas
    I. Pons
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2015, 32 : 177 - 184
  • [46] Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer - Reply
    Auer, M
    Schwaerzler, P
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (06) : 1747 - 1748
  • [47] Can time-lapse culture combined with artificial intelligence improve ongoing pregnancy rates in fresh transfer cycles of single cleavage stage embryos?
    Wang, Xiao
    Wei, Qipeng
    Huang, Weiyu
    Yin, Lanlan
    Ma, Tianzhong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [48] Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results
    Fernandez-Shaw, S.
    Cercas, R.
    Brana, C.
    Villas, C.
    Pons, I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2015, 32 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [49] Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first frozen cycles of OHSS-risk patients who deferred from fresh embryo transfer
    Chen, Hua
    Lv, Jie-Qiang
    Wu, Xin-Mei
    Xiao, Yu
    Xi, Hai-Tao
    Zhu, Chun-Fang
    Huang, Jian-Ying
    Zhang, Fan
    Ge, Hong-Shan
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (09) : 698 - 701
  • [50] Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer vs. frozen cleavage-stage embryo transfer in couples with recurrent implantation failure: a cohort study
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Gao, Yang
    Liu, Weiwei
    Liu, Junxia
    Wu, Lihong
    Xiong, Shun
    Zhu, Jiahong
    Han, Wei
    Wang, Jiang
    Hao, Xiangwei
    Han, Shubiao
    Huang, Guoning
    [J]. HUMAN FERTILITY, 2021, 24 (04) : 284 - 289
12345