Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in blastocyst-stage biopsy with frozen embryo transfer and cleavage-stage biopsy with fresh embryo transfer after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening

被引:29
|
作者
Jing, Shuang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Keli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He, Hui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lu, Changfu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Shuoping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tan, Yueqiu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gong, Fei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lu, Guangxiu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Ge [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Sch Basic Med, Inst Reprod & Stem Cell Engn, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Hlth & Family Planning Commiss, Key Lab Reprod & Stem Cell Engn, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Reprod & Genet Hosp CITIC Xiangya, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; blastocyst-stage biopsy; cleavage-stage biopsy; neonatal outcomes; pregnancy complications; frozen embryo transfer; PREGNANCY FOLLOW-UP; BLASTOMERE BIOPSY; DATA-COLLECTION; PSYCHOMOTOR DEVELOPMENT; CHILDREN BORN; MOUSE MODEL; PGD; DIAGNOSIS; CYCLES; IMPLANTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To study whether embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/preimplantation genetic screening (PGD/PGS) can influence pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: University-affiliated center. Patient(s): This study included data from women and their neonates born after PGD/PGS (n = 317). Main Outcome Measure(s): Questionnaires were designed to obtain information relating to pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes. Intervention(s): Two major strategies for PGD/PGS were evaluated. Blastocyst-stage biopsy and frozen embryo transfer (BB-FET) was carried out in 166 patients, and cleavage-stage biopsy and fresh embryo transfer (CB-ET) was carried out in 129 patients. Result(s): The incidence of gestational hypertension was significantly higher in BB-FET compared with in CB-ET (9.0% vs. 2.3%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.85 [1.34, 17.56]). In twins, the birthweight (median [range], 2.70 kg [1.55-3.60 kg] vs. 2.50 kg [1.23-3.75 kg]) was higher in BB-FET than in CB-ET and the gestational age was longer in BB-FET than in CB-ET (median [range], 36.71 weeks [31.14-39.29 weeks] vs. 35.57 weeks [30.57-38.43 weeks]). There was no difference in the incidence of singleton births between the two groups except in the incidence of preterm births (28-37 weeks; 5.3% vs. 16.5% in CB-ET and BB-FET). No significant differences were detected in the incidence of perinatal deaths, birth defects, gender of neonates, and large for gestational age in both singletons and twins, although the numbers of some events were small. Conclusion(s): BB-FET is associated with a higher incidence of gestational hypertension but better neonatal outcomes compared with CB-ET, especially in twins. (C) 2016 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer
    Boerwinkle, Caroline H.
    Tolcher, Mary C.
    Hoff, Heather S.
    Aagaard, Kjersti M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S545 - S545
  • [2] Blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer?
    Johnson, Neil
    Blake, Debbie
    Farquhar, Cindy
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [3] Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta
    Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Cornelisse, Simone
    Blake, Deborah
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (05):
  • [4] Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first frozen cycles of OHSS-risk patients who deferred from fresh embryo transfer
    Chen, Hua
    Lv, Jie-Qiang
    Wu, Xin-Mei
    Xiao, Yu
    Xi, Hai-Tao
    Zhu, Chun-Fang
    Huang, Jian-Ying
    Zhang, Fan
    Ge, Hong-Shan
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (09) : 698 - 701
  • [5] Cleavage stage embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis
    Handyside, AH
    Thornhill, A
    [J]. FERTILITY AND REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 1183 : 223 - 229
  • [6] Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared with those after cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis
    Marconi, Nicola
    Allen, Christopher Patrick
    Bhattacharya, Siladitya
    Maheshwari, Abha
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2022, 28 (02) : 255 - 281
  • [7] Obstetric and neonatal outcomes from trophoblast biopsy combined with frozen embryo transfer versus cleavage biopsy with fresh embryo transfer in PGD/PGS treatment
    Jing, S.
    He, H.
    Tan, Y. Q.
    Tan, K.
    Cheng, D. H.
    Luo, K. L.
    Gong, F.
    Li, J.
    Lin, G.
    Lu, G. X.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 55 - 56
  • [8] NEONATAL AND MATERNAL OUTCOMES AFTER FRESH BLASTOCYST AND CLEAVAGE STAGE EMBRYO TRANSFER IN THE FIRST EMBRYO TRANSFER CYCLE.
    Du, M.
    Wang, X.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E370 - E370
  • [9] Blastocyst transfer is not associated with increased unfavorable obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared with cleavage-stage embryo transfer
    Li, Wei
    Xue, Xia
    Zhao, Wanqiu
    Ren, Anqi
    Zhuo, Weiwei
    Shi, Juanzi
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 33 (11) : 857 - 860
  • [10] Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle
    De Vos, Anick
    Van Landuyt, Lisbet
    Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
    Camus, Michel
    Van de Velde, Hilde
    Tournaye, Herman
    Verheyen, Greta
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (11) : 2442 - 2449