The Effects of Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:26
|
作者
Ojo, Omorogieva [1 ]
Ojo, Osarhumwese Osaretin [2 ]
Feng, Qianqian [3 ]
Boateng, Joshua [4 ]
Wang, Xiaohua [3 ]
Brooke, Joanne [5 ]
Adegboye, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greenwich, Sch Hlth Sci Hlth & Human Sci, Fac Educ, Avery Hill Campus,Avery Hill Rd, London SE9 2UG, England
[2] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, Univ Hosp, Smoking Cessat Dept, Lewisham High St, London SE13 6LH, England
[3] Soochow Univ, Sch Nursing, Suzhou 215006, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Greenwich, Sch Sci, Medway Campus,Cent Ave, Chatham ME4 4TB, Kent, England
[5] Birmingham City Univ, Fac Hlth Educ & Life Sci, Ravensbury House,City South Campus, Birmingham B15 3TN, W Midlands, England
[6] Coventry Univ, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Ctr Healthcare Res, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
关键词
COVID-19; enteral nutrition; early enteral nutrition; delayed enteral nutrition; parenteral nutrition; gastrointestinal intolerance; mortality; length of hospital stay; days on mechanical ventilation;
D O I
10.3390/nu14051120
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Patients who are critically ill with COVID-19 could have impaired nutrient absorption due to disruption of the normal intestinal mucosa. They are often in a state of high inflammation, increased stress and catabolism as well as a significant increase in energy and protein requirements. Therefore, timely enteral nutrition support and the provision of optimal nutrients are essential in preventing malnutrition in these patients. Aim: This review aims to evaluate the effects of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Method: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-Analysis framework and PICO. Searches were conducted in databases, including EMBASE, Health Research databases and Google Scholar. Searches were conducted from database inception until 3 February 2022. The reference lists of articles were also searched for relevant articles. Results: Seven articles were included in the systematic review, and four articles were included in the meta-analysis. Two distinct areas were identified from the results of the systematic review and meta-analysis: the impact of enteral nutrition and gastrointestinal intolerance associated with enteral nutrition. The impact of enteral nutrition was further sub-divided into early enteral nutrition versus delayed enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition. The results of the meta-analysis of the effects of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with COVID-19 showed that, overall, enteral nutrition was effective in significantly reducing the risk of mortality in these patients compared with the control with a risk ratio of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79, 0.99, p = 0.04). Following sub-group analysis, the early enteral nutrition group also showed a significant reduction in the risk of mortality with a risk ratio of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79, 1.00, p = 0.05). The Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) of mortality in patients with COVID-19 by early enteral nutrition was 11%. There was a significant reduction in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the early enteral nutrition group compared with the delayed enteral nutrition group. There was no significant difference between enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition in relation to mortality (RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.28, p = 0.48). Concerning the length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay and days on mechanical ventilation, while there were reductions in the number of days in the enteral nutrition group compared to the control (delayed enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition), the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The results showed that early enteral nutrition significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the risk of mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19. However, early enteral nutrition or enteral nutrition did not significantly (p > 0.05) reduce the length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay and days on mechanical ventilation compared to delayed enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition. More studies are needed to examine the effect of early enteral nutrition in patients with COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incidence, clinical characteristics and outcome of barotrauma in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Umbrello, Michele
    Venco, Roberto
    Antonucci, Edoardo
    Cereghini, Sergio
    Filardo, Clelia
    Guglielmetti, Luigi
    Montanari, Giulia
    Muttini, Stefano
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2022, 88 (09) : 706 - 718
  • [22] Effects of intermittent feeding versus continuous feeding on enteral nutrition tolerance in critically ill patients A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yuanli
    Yang, Jin
    Sun, Shunxia
    Huang, Juan
    Zhang, Aiguo
    Tang, Xiaoling
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (50) : E23528
  • [23] Efficacy of taurine-enhanced enteral nutrition in improving the outcomes of critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Chi
    Sun, Ming-wei
    Yang, Guang-yu
    Wang, Yu
    Lu, Charles Damien
    Jiang, Hua
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2024, 61 : 203 - 211
  • [24] Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gunnar Elke
    Arthur R. H. van Zanten
    Margot Lemieux
    Michele McCall
    Khursheed N. Jeejeebhoy
    Matthias Kott
    Xuran Jiang
    Andrew G. Day
    Daren K. Heyland
    Critical Care, 20
  • [25] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous vs intermittent enteral nutrition in critically ill adults
    Thong, Debbie
    Halim, Zakiah
    Chia, Joel
    Chua, Fionn
    Wong, Alvin
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2022, 46 (06) : 1243 - 1257
  • [26] Current evidence on ω-3 fatty acids in enteral nutrition in the critically ill: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Koekkoek, W. A. C.
    Panteleon, Vasilianna
    van Zanten, Arthur R. H.
    NUTRITION, 2019, 59 : 56 - 68
  • [27] Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Elke, Gunnar
    van Zanten, Arthur R. H.
    Lemieux, Margot
    McCall, Michele
    Jeejeebhoy, Khursheed N.
    Kott, Matthias
    Jiang, Xuran
    Day, Andrew G.
    Heyland, Daren K.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [28] Venous thromboembolism in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hasan, Syed Shahzad
    Radford, Sam
    Kow, Chia Siang
    Zaidi, Syed Tabish Razi
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2020, 50 (04) : 814 - 821
  • [29] Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy in severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Luo Wenjing
    Feng Yuanzheng
    Li, Jun-Ying
    Tang, Liang V.
    Yu, Hu
    AGING-US, 2021, 13 (01): : 1498 - 1509
  • [30] Anticoagulation Strategies in Non-critically Ill COVID-19 Inpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    See, X.
    Ahmed, O.
    Chiang, C.
    Peng, C.
    Chang, Y.
    Liu, W.
    Wang, Z.
    Chiang, C.
    Hsia, Y.
    Chiang, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209