A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G x E interaction

被引:179
|
作者
Flores, F [1 ]
Moreno, MT
Cubero, JI
机构
[1] Univ Huelva, EPS La Rabida, Dept Ciencias Agroforestales, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Huelva, Spain
[2] Ctr Invest & Formac Agrario, Dept Mejora & Agron, Cordoba 14080, Spain
[3] Univ Cordoba, Dept Genet, E-14080 Cordoba, Spain
关键词
genotype-environment interaction; principal components analysis; stability; yield;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00095-6
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Twenty-two different methods (parametric, nonparametric and multivariate) used for analysing genotype X environment (G X E) interaction were compared by applying them to two sets of experimental data (15 faba bean cultivars X 12 environments and 11 pea cultivars X 16 environments). A principal components analysis was performed on the rank correlation matrix arising from the application of each method. The 22 methods can be categorized, in both sets of experimental data, in three groups: (1) those which are mostly associated with yield level and show little or no correlation with stability parameters; (2) those in which both yield level and stability of performance are considered simultaneously to reduce the effect of G x E interaction; and (3) those methods which only measure stability. This analysis also separated those methods based on an agronomic concept of stability from those which are based on a biological one, as well as distinguishing between 'dynamic' and 'static' stability-based methods. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 286
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of univariate and multivariate anthropometric accommodation of the northwest Mexico population
    Rodriguez Vega, Graciela
    Zaldivar Colado, Ulises
    Zaldivar Colado, Xiomara Penelope
    Rodriguez Vega, Dora Aydee
    de la Vega Bustillos, Enrique Javier
    ERGONOMICS, 2021, 64 (08) : 1018 - 1034
  • [42] ON COMPARISON OF UNIVARIATE NORMAL MEAN AND ELEMENTS OF MULTIVARIATE NORMAL MEAN
    Furukatsu, Taichi
    Shimamoto, Daisuke
    Hyakutake, Hiroto
    ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS IN STATISTICS, 2010, 16 (02) : 147 - 161
  • [43] BEHAVIORAL COMPONENTS OF ASSERTION - COMPARISON OF UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES
    KOLOTKIN, RA
    WIELKIEWICZ, RM
    JUDD, B
    WEISER, S
    BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 1984, 6 (01): : 61 - 78
  • [44] Comparison of univariate and multivariate linkage analysis of traits related to hypertension
    Courtney Gray-McGuire
    Yeunjoo Song
    Nathan J Morris
    Catherine M Stein
    BMC Proceedings, 3 (Suppl 7)
  • [45] G x E interaction in Drosophila aggressive behavior
    Arnold, Jonathan
    Kim, Andrew
    Kim, Yong-Kyu
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2011, 41 (06) : 915 - 915
  • [46] Statistics for the social and behavioral sciences: Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate - Diekhoff,G
    Suen, HK
    Parkes, J
    CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 41 (11): : 1104 - 1105
  • [47] Comparison of the univariate and multivariate methods in the optimization of experimental conditions for determining Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd in biodiesel by GFAAS
    Lobo, Fabiana A.
    Goveia, Danielle
    de Oliveira, Adriana P.
    Pereira-Filho, Edenir R.
    Fraceto, Leonardo F.
    Dias Filho, Newton L.
    Rosa, Andre H.
    FUEL, 2009, 88 (10) : 1907 - 1914
  • [49] THE EXACT DISTRIBUTIONS OF THE UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE BEHRENS-FISHER STATISTICS WITH A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL SOLUTIONS IN THE UNIVARIATE CASE
    NEL, DG
    VANDERMERWE, CA
    MOSER, BK
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 1990, 19 (01) : 279 - 298
  • [50] Multimodal imaging: an evaluation of univariate and multivariate methods for simultaneous EEG/fMRI
    De Martino, Federico
    Valente, Giancarlo
    de Borst, Aline W.
    Esposito, Fabrizio
    Roebroeck, Alard
    Goebel, Rainer
    Formisano, Elia
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 28 (08) : 1104 - 1112