A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G x E interaction

被引:179
|
作者
Flores, F [1 ]
Moreno, MT
Cubero, JI
机构
[1] Univ Huelva, EPS La Rabida, Dept Ciencias Agroforestales, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Huelva, Spain
[2] Ctr Invest & Formac Agrario, Dept Mejora & Agron, Cordoba 14080, Spain
[3] Univ Cordoba, Dept Genet, E-14080 Cordoba, Spain
关键词
genotype-environment interaction; principal components analysis; stability; yield;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00095-6
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Twenty-two different methods (parametric, nonparametric and multivariate) used for analysing genotype X environment (G X E) interaction were compared by applying them to two sets of experimental data (15 faba bean cultivars X 12 environments and 11 pea cultivars X 16 environments). A principal components analysis was performed on the rank correlation matrix arising from the application of each method. The 22 methods can be categorized, in both sets of experimental data, in three groups: (1) those which are mostly associated with yield level and show little or no correlation with stability parameters; (2) those in which both yield level and stability of performance are considered simultaneously to reduce the effect of G x E interaction; and (3) those methods which only measure stability. This analysis also separated those methods based on an agronomic concept of stability from those which are based on a biological one, as well as distinguishing between 'dynamic' and 'static' stability-based methods. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 286
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing Univariate and Multivariate Methods for Short Term Load Forecasting
    Goswami, Kuheli
    Ganguly, Ayandeep
    Sil, Arindam Kumar
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, POWER AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (GUCON), 2018, : 972 - 976
  • [32] A tutorial on the validation of qualitative methods: From the univariate to the multivariate approach
    Isabel Lopez, M.
    Pilar Callao, M.
    Ruisancez, Itziar
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2015, 891 : 62 - 72
  • [33] Univariate and multivariate methods for chemical mapping of cervical cancer cells
    Duraipandian, Shiyamala
    Zheng, Wei
    Huang, Zhiwei
    BIOMEDICAL VIBRATIONAL SPECTROSCOPY V: ADVANCES IN RESEARCH AND INDUSTRY, 2012, 8219
  • [34] BAYESIAN INFERENCE METHODS FOR UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE GARCH MODELS: A SURVEY
    Virbickaite, Audrone
    Concepcion Ausin, M.
    Galeano, Pedro
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2015, 29 (01) : 76 - 96
  • [35] Finite mixture distribution models for latent G x G, G x C and G x E interaction
    Neale, MC
    Gillespie, N
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2005, 35 (06) : 815 - 815
  • [36] Probability binning comparison: A metric for comparing univariate or multivariate distributions
    Roederer, M
    Moore, WA
    Treister, AS
    Hardy, RR
    Herzenberg, LA
    CYTOMETRY, 2002, : 135 - 135
  • [37] MEASUREMENT OF ELECTROENCEPHALIC EVOKED-RESPONSE - COMPARISON OF UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE
    SCHACHTER, J
    LACHIN, JM
    KERR, JL
    WIMBERLY, FC
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 13 (03) : 261 - 267
  • [38] COMPARISON OF UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE ASPECTS OF ESTUARINE MEIOBENTHIC COMMUNITY STRUCTURE
    AUSTEN, MC
    WARWICK, RM
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 1989, 29 (01) : 23 - 42
  • [39] Multivariate or Univariate Model Analysis For Indoor Location Systems: A Comparison
    Galvan-Tejada, Carlos E.
    Garcia-Vazquez, Juan P.
    Galvan-Tejada, Jorge I.
    Brena, Ramon
    25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTERS (CONIELECOMP 2015), 2015, : 116 - 120
  • [40] A comparison of estimators of the proportion nonconforming in univariate and multivariate normal samples
    Hamilton, DC
    Lesperance, ML
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 1997, 59 (04) : 333 - 348