A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G x E interaction
被引:179
|
作者:
Flores, F
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Huelva, EPS La Rabida, Dept Ciencias Agroforestales, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Huelva, SpainUniv Huelva, EPS La Rabida, Dept Ciencias Agroforestales, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Huelva, Spain
Flores, F
[1
]
Moreno, MT
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Huelva, EPS La Rabida, Dept Ciencias Agroforestales, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Huelva, Spain
Moreno, MT
Cubero, JI
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Huelva, EPS La Rabida, Dept Ciencias Agroforestales, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Huelva, Spain
Cubero, JI
机构:
[1] Univ Huelva, EPS La Rabida, Dept Ciencias Agroforestales, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Huelva, Spain
genotype-environment interaction;
principal components analysis;
stability;
yield;
D O I:
10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00095-6
中图分类号:
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号:
0901 ;
摘要:
Twenty-two different methods (parametric, nonparametric and multivariate) used for analysing genotype X environment (G X E) interaction were compared by applying them to two sets of experimental data (15 faba bean cultivars X 12 environments and 11 pea cultivars X 16 environments). A principal components analysis was performed on the rank correlation matrix arising from the application of each method. The 22 methods can be categorized, in both sets of experimental data, in three groups: (1) those which are mostly associated with yield level and show little or no correlation with stability parameters; (2) those in which both yield level and stability of performance are considered simultaneously to reduce the effect of G x E interaction; and (3) those methods which only measure stability. This analysis also separated those methods based on an agronomic concept of stability from those which are based on a biological one, as well as distinguishing between 'dynamic' and 'static' stability-based methods. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.