Risk Stratification of COVID-19 Using Routine Laboratory Tests: A Machine Learning Approach

被引:6
|
作者
Mlambo, Farai [1 ]
Chironda, Cyril [1 ]
George, Jaya [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Stat & Actuarial Sci, 1 Jan Smuts Ave, ZA-2000 Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Dept Chem Pathol, 29 Princess Wales Terrace, ZA-2193 Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Natl Hlth Lab Serv South Africa, 1 Modderfontein Rd, ZA-2131 Johannesburg, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COVID-19; machine learning; risk stratification; laboratory tests; STATISTICS; CLASSIFICATION; IMPUTATION; MODELS; HIV;
D O I
10.3390/idr14060090
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic placed significant stress on an already overburdened health system. The diagnosis was based on detection of a positive RT-PCR test, which may be delayed when there is peak demand for testing. Rapid risk stratification of high-risk patients allows for the prioritization of resources for patient care. The study aims were to classify patients as severe or not severe based on outcomes using machine learning on routine laboratory tests. Data were extracted for all individuals who had at least one SARS-CoV-2 PCR test conducted via the NHLS between the periods of 1 March 2020 to 7 July 2020. Exclusion criteria: those 18 years, and those with indeterminate PCR tests. Results for 15437 patients (3301 positive and 12,136 negative) were used to fit six machine learning models, namely the logistic regression (LR) (the base model), decision trees (DT), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), convolutional neural network (CNN) and self-normalising neural network (SNN). Model development was carried out by splitting the data into training and testing set of a ratio 70:30, together with a 10-fold cross-validation re-sampling technique. For risk stratification, admission to high care or ICU was the outcome for severe disease. Performance of the models varied: sensitivity was best for RF at 75% and accuracy of 75% for CNN. The area under the curve ranged from 57% for CNN to 75% for RF. RF and SNN were the best-performing models. Machine Learning (ML) can be incorporated into the laboratory information system and offers promise for early identification and risk stratification of COVID-19 patients, particularly in areas of resource-poor settings.
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 931
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting COVID-19 exposure risk perception using machine learning
    Bakkeli, Nan Zou
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [22] Predicting COVID-19 exposure risk perception using machine learning
    Nan Zou Bakkeli
    BMC Public Health, 23
  • [23] Development, evaluation, and validation of machine learning models for COVID-19 detection based on routine blood tests
    Cabitza, Federico
    Campagner, Andrea
    Ferrari, Davide
    Di Resta, Chiara
    Ceriotti, Daniele
    Sabetta, Eleonora
    Colombini, Alessandra
    De Vecchi, Elena
    Banfi, Giuseppe
    Locatelli, Massimo
    Carobene, Anna
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 59 (02) : 421 - 431
  • [24] Covid-19 Mortality Risk Prediction Model Using Machine Learning
    Sanchez-Galvez, Alba Maribel
    Sanchez-Galvez, Sully
    Alvarez-Gonzalez, Ricardo
    Rojas-Alarcon, Frida
    COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS, 2023, 27 (04): : 881 - 888
  • [25] Machine learning approach for COVID-19 crisis using the clinical data
    Kumar, N. R. P.
    Shetty, N. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY & BIOPHYSICS, 2020, 57 (05): : 602 - 605
  • [26] Early coagulation tests predict risk stratification and prognosis of COVID-19
    Luo, Lili
    Xu, Min
    Du, Mengyi
    Kou, Haiming
    Liao, Danying
    Cheng, Zhipeng
    Mei, Heng
    Hu, Yu
    AGING-US, 2020, 12 (16): : 15918 - 15937
  • [27] Prediction of COVID-19 Severity Using Chest Computed Tomography and Laboratory Measurements: Evaluation Using a Machine Learning Approach
    Li, Daowei
    Zhang, Qiang
    Tan, Yue
    Feng, Xinghuo
    Yue, Yuanyi
    Bai, Yuhan
    Li, Jimeng
    Li, Jiahang
    Xu, Youjun
    Chen, Shiyu
    Xiao, Si-Yu
    Sun, Muyan
    Li, Xiaona
    Zhu, Fang
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 8 (11)
  • [28] Clinical risk stratification in COVID-19: the need for a revised approach?
    Cherian, Robin
    PULMONARY CIRCULATION, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [29] Implications of Laboratory Tests in Disease Grading and Death Risk Stratification of COVID-19: A Retrospective Study in Wuhan, China
    Bai, Yang
    Wang, Enxin
    Zhao, Shoujie
    Li, Jing
    Zhu, Yejing
    Zhang, Yongchao
    Cao, Liang
    Liu, Haitao
    Dong, Yushu
    Wang, Fang
    Liang, Guobiao
    Liu, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [30] Machine Learning Approach for COVID-19 Detection on Twitter
    Amin, Samina
    Uddin, M. Irfan
    Al-Baity, Heyam H.
    Zeb, M. Ali
    Khan, M. Abrar
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2021, 68 (02): : 2231 - 2247