Feedforward, Cascade and Model Predictive Control Algorithms for De-Oiling Hydrocyclones: Simulation Study

被引:3
|
作者
Vallabhan, Mishiga K. G. [1 ]
Matias, Jose [2 ]
Holden, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Chem Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
De-oiling hydrocyclones; Control Schemes; Simulation;
D O I
10.4173/mic.2021.4.4
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Maintaining the efficiency of the produced-water treatment system is important for the oil and gas industry, especially taking into consideration the environmental impact caused of the produced-water. De-oiling hydrocyclones are one of the most common type of equipment used in the produced-water treatment system. The low residence time of this device makes it difficult for a control system to maintain efficiencies at different plant disturbances. In this paper, a control-oriented hydrocyclone model with a traditional pressure drop ratio (PDR) controller is analysed, and the inability of the PDR controller to maintain the efficiency when increasing the inlet concentration is shown experimentally as well as in simulation. Then, we propose three control schemes for dealing with this issue: a feed-forward, a feed-back/cascade and a model predictive controller. We show in simulation that all proposed schemes are able to improve and maintain the efficiency of hydrocyclones considering the upstream disturbances, such as variations in inlet oil concentrations and inflow rates. We also discuss the characteristics of the three methods and propose guidelines for choosing the appropriate scheme based on the available resources at the industrial site (such as measurements, hardware and software at hand).
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 195
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feedforward Finite Control Set Model Predictive Position Control of PMSM
    Kyslan, Karol
    Slapak, Viktor
    Durovsky, Frantisek
    Fedak, Viliam
    Padmanaban, Sanjeevikumar
    2018 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL POWER ELECTRONICS AND MOTION CONTROL CONFERENCE (PEMC), 2018, : 549 - 555
  • [22] Algorithms for industrial model predictive control
    Sandoz, DJ
    Desforges, MJ
    Lennox, B
    Goulding, PR
    COMPUTING & CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2000, 11 (03): : 125 - 134
  • [23] A Simulation Investigation of Modified FxLMS Algorithms for Feedforward Active Noise Control
    Shi, Chuang
    Liang, Nan
    Xie, Rong
    Li, Huiyong
    2019 ASIA-PACIFIC SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING ASSOCIATION ANNUAL SUMMIT AND CONFERENCE (APSIPA ASC), 2019, : 1833 - 1837
  • [24] Advanced Model Predictive Feedforward/Feedback Control of a Tablet Press
    Nicholas Townsend Haas
    Marianthi Ierapetritou
    Ravendra Singh
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 2017, 12 : 110 - 123
  • [25] A novel AQM algorithm based on feedforward model predictive control
    Wang, Ping
    Zhu, ChaoJie
    Yang, XiaoPing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 31 (12)
  • [27] An Approach for Feedforward Model Predictive Control of Continuous Pulp Digesters
    Rahman, Moksadur
    Avelin, Anders
    Kyprianidis, Konstantinos
    PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (09)
  • [28] Model predictive control for wastewater treatment process with feedforward compensation
    Shen, Wenhao
    Chen, Xiaoquan
    Pons, M. N.
    Corriou, J. P.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2009, 155 (1-2) : 161 - 174
  • [29] Benefits of Feedforward for Model Predictive Airpath Control of Diesel Engines
    Zhang, Jiadi
    Amini, Mohammad Reza
    Kolmanovsky, Ilya
    Tsutsumi, Munechika
    Nakada, Hayato
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (25): : 181 - 186
  • [30] Advanced Model Predictive Feedforward/Feedback Control of a Tablet Press
    Haas, Nicholas Townsend
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi
    Singh, Ravendra
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION, 2017, 12 (02) : 110 - 123