Model predictive control for wastewater treatment process with feedforward compensation

被引:94
|
作者
Shen, Wenhao [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoquan [1 ]
Pons, M. N. [2 ]
Corriou, J. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] S China Univ Technol, State Key Lab Pulp & Paper Engn, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[2] Ecole Natl Super Ind Chim, Inst Natl Polytech Lorraine, CNRS, Lab Sci Genie Chim, F-54001 Nancy, France
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Model predictive control (MPC); Feedforward; DMC; QDMC; Wastewater treatment; BSM1; benchmark; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE PROCESS; NITROGEN REMOVAL; NITRATE RECIRCULATION; CONTROL STRATEGIES; DESIGN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2009.07.039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Being an optimizing technology, model predictive control (MPC) can now be found in a wide variety of application fields. The main and most obvious control goal to be achieved in a wastewater treatment plant is to fulfill the effluent quality standards, while minimizing the operational costs. In order to maintain the effluent quality within regulation-specified limits, the MPC strategy has been applied to the Benchmark Simulation Model 1 (BSM1) simulation benchmark of wastewater treatment process. After the discussion of open loop responses of outputs to manipulated inputs and measured influent disturbances, the strategies of feedback by linear dynamic matrix control (DMC), quadratic dynamic matrix control (QDMC) and nonlinear model predictive control (NLMPC), and improvement by feedforward based on influent flow rate or ammonium concentration have been investigated. The simulation results indicate that good performance was achieved under steady influent characteristics, especially concerning the nitrogen-related species. Compared to DMC and QDMC, NLMPC with penalty function brings little improvement. Two measured disturbances have been used for feedforward control, the influent flow rate and ammonium concentration. It is shown that the performance of feedforward with respect to the influent ammonium concentration is much higher than for the feedforward with respect to the influent flow rate. However, this latter is slightly better than the DMC feedback. The best performance is obtained by combining both feedforward controllers with respect to the influent ammonium concentration and flow rate. In all cases, the improvement of performance is correlated with more aeration energy consumption. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 174
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ammonia control of a wastewater treatment process Using Model Predictive Control
    Liu, Xiaoxin
    Jing, Yuanwei
    Xu, Jiahe
    Zhang, Siying
    26TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (2014 CCDC), 2014, : 494 - 498
  • [2] Predictive control of a wastewater treatment process
    Caraman, Sergiu
    Sbarciog, Mihaela
    Barbu, Marian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2007, 2 (02) : 132 - 142
  • [3] Feedforward model predictive control
    Carrasco, Diego S.
    Goodwin, Graham C.
    ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2011, 35 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [4] Model Predictive Feedforward Compensation for Control of Multi Axes Hybrid Kinematics on PLC
    Rueting, Arne
    Blumenthal, Lars Martin
    Traechtler, Ansgar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IECON 2016 - 42ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2016, : 583 - 588
  • [5] Nonlinear multiobjective model-predictive control scheme for wastewater treatment process
    Han, Hong-Gui
    Qian, Hu-Hai
    Qiao, Jun-Fei
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2014, 24 (03) : 47 - 59
  • [6] Data-based robust model predictive control for wastewater treatment process
    Han, Hong-Gui
    Wang, Chen-Yang
    Sun, Hao-Yuan
    Qiao, Jun-Fei
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2022, 118 : 115 - 125
  • [7] Dissolved oxygen control of the activated sludge wastewater treatment process using model predictive control
    Holenda, B.
    Domokos, E.
    Redey, A.
    Fazakas, J.
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 32 (06) : 1270 - 1278
  • [8] Three-vector-based model predictive current control with disturbance feedforward compensation
    Xu, Yanping
    Li, Hangke
    Ren, Jinglu
    Zhang, Yanping
    JOURNAL OF POWER ELECTRONICS, 2020, 20 (03) : 687 - 697
  • [9] Three-vector-based model predictive current control with disturbance feedforward compensation
    Yanping Xu
    Hangke Li
    Jinglu Ren
    Yanping Zhang
    Journal of Power Electronics, 2020, 20 : 687 - 697
  • [10] Robust Model Free Adaptive Predictive Control for Wastewater Treatment Process With Packet Dropouts
    Han, Hong-Gui
    Fu, Shi-Jia
    Sun, Hao-Yuan
    Wang, Chen-Yang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2024, 54 (10) : 6069 - 6080