Model predictive control for wastewater treatment process with feedforward compensation

被引:94
|
作者
Shen, Wenhao [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoquan [1 ]
Pons, M. N. [2 ]
Corriou, J. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] S China Univ Technol, State Key Lab Pulp & Paper Engn, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[2] Ecole Natl Super Ind Chim, Inst Natl Polytech Lorraine, CNRS, Lab Sci Genie Chim, F-54001 Nancy, France
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Model predictive control (MPC); Feedforward; DMC; QDMC; Wastewater treatment; BSM1; benchmark; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE PROCESS; NITROGEN REMOVAL; NITRATE RECIRCULATION; CONTROL STRATEGIES; DESIGN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2009.07.039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Being an optimizing technology, model predictive control (MPC) can now be found in a wide variety of application fields. The main and most obvious control goal to be achieved in a wastewater treatment plant is to fulfill the effluent quality standards, while minimizing the operational costs. In order to maintain the effluent quality within regulation-specified limits, the MPC strategy has been applied to the Benchmark Simulation Model 1 (BSM1) simulation benchmark of wastewater treatment process. After the discussion of open loop responses of outputs to manipulated inputs and measured influent disturbances, the strategies of feedback by linear dynamic matrix control (DMC), quadratic dynamic matrix control (QDMC) and nonlinear model predictive control (NLMPC), and improvement by feedforward based on influent flow rate or ammonium concentration have been investigated. The simulation results indicate that good performance was achieved under steady influent characteristics, especially concerning the nitrogen-related species. Compared to DMC and QDMC, NLMPC with penalty function brings little improvement. Two measured disturbances have been used for feedforward control, the influent flow rate and ammonium concentration. It is shown that the performance of feedforward with respect to the influent ammonium concentration is much higher than for the feedforward with respect to the influent flow rate. However, this latter is slightly better than the DMC feedback. The best performance is obtained by combining both feedforward controllers with respect to the influent ammonium concentration and flow rate. In all cases, the improvement of performance is correlated with more aeration energy consumption. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 174
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Feedforward Finite Control Set Model Predictive Position Control of PMSM
    Kyslan, Karol
    Slapak, Viktor
    Durovsky, Frantisek
    Fedak, Viliam
    Padmanaban, Sanjeevikumar
    2018 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL POWER ELECTRONICS AND MOTION CONTROL CONFERENCE (PEMC), 2018, : 549 - 555
  • [42] Data-Driven Fault Compensation Tracking Control for Coupled Wastewater Treatment Process
    Du, Peihao
    Zhong, Weimin
    Peng, Xin
    Li, Linlin
    Li, Zhi
    IEEE-CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2023, 10 (01) : 294 - 297
  • [43] Data-Driven Fault Compensation Tracking Control for Coupled Wastewater Treatment Process
    Peihao Du
    Weimin Zhong
    Xin Peng
    Linlin Li
    Zhi Li
    IEEE/CAAJournalofAutomaticaSinica, 2023, 10 (01) : 294 - 297
  • [44] Advanced Model Predictive Feedforward/Feedback Control of a Tablet Press
    Nicholas Townsend Haas
    Marianthi Ierapetritou
    Ravendra Singh
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 2017, 12 : 110 - 123
  • [45] A novel AQM algorithm based on feedforward model predictive control
    Wang, Ping
    Zhu, ChaoJie
    Yang, XiaoPing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 31 (12)
  • [46] An Approach for Feedforward Model Predictive Control of Continuous Pulp Digesters
    Rahman, Moksadur
    Avelin, Anders
    Kyprianidis, Konstantinos
    PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (09)
  • [47] Stiction Compensation via Model Predictive Control
    Durand, Helen
    Christofides, Panagiotis D.
    2016 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2016, : 4488 - 4493
  • [48] Benefits of Feedforward for Model Predictive Airpath Control of Diesel Engines
    Zhang, Jiadi
    Amini, Mohammad Reza
    Kolmanovsky, Ilya
    Tsutsumi, Munechika
    Nakada, Hayato
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (25): : 181 - 186
  • [49] Parallel Model Predictive Control with Feedback Compensation
    Sumioka, Tadashi
    Yamakita, Masaki
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL APPLICATIONS (CCA), 2012, : 1435 - 1440
  • [50] Advanced Model Predictive Feedforward/Feedback Control of a Tablet Press
    Haas, Nicholas Townsend
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi
    Singh, Ravendra
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION, 2017, 12 (02) : 110 - 123