Remotely operated underwater vehicles used in water rescue

被引:1
|
作者
Luck, Thorsten [1 ]
Kvasnicka, Volker [1 ]
Luck, Anabell [2 ]
机构
[1] DLRG Landesverband Bayern eV, Woffenbacher Str 34, D-92318 Neumarkt, Germany
[2] DLRG Ortsverband Pocking Starnberg eV, Pocking, Germany
来源
UNFALLCHIRURG | 2021年 / 124卷 / 12期
关键词
Drowning; Diving; Underwater navigation; Side-scan sonar; Technological innovation;
D O I
10.1007/s00113-021-01097-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background The search for and rescue of missing persons is always coupled with a high demand on human resources. In cases of suspected drowning it is often necessary to search huge expanses of water. For depths of more than 3-5 m the search and rescue procedure needs to be performed by specialist rescue divers. Due to saturation with nitrogen caused by the higher ambient pressure during the dive, the operating time for each rescue diver is limited. In addition, each dive is linked with an increased risk. Objective Miniaturization of sensors, higher performance of embedded systems and high energy density of modern accumulators offer the chance to operate with unmanned flying and diving vehicles for search and rescue even with moderate financial investment. Material and methods Based on funding by the Federation of the German Live Saving Association (DLRG) the DLRG national association of Bavaria procured three different models of remotely operated underwater vehicles (ROUV) and two different systems for underwater positioning. These systems will be offered to local associations of the DLRG in Bavaria for intense testing in their waters based on a common implementation strategy to ensure comparability and reproducibility. Results Initial tests with different types of ROUV and underwater positioning have been performed in preparation of the survey. As a result, mini-ROUVs found in the lower consumer segment have been identified as insufficient as they are not able to carry the additional payload of the underwater positioning systems whilst maintaining controllability. In contrast, more complex drones are difficult to handle and require longer preparation times before they are ready for use. The ROUVs in the median range, preferably with a streamlined structure, have so far been found to be optimal; however, operating the vehicle without a positioning system is not recommended. Conclusion In combination with an underwater positioning system, remotely operated underwater vehicles are identified as a reasonable supplement for rescue divers. Fast time to operation enables a preview of the operating area before starting the rescue operation and can therefore support the rescue diver team.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 983
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicles for fast and low cost bathymetry surveys
    Di Risio, Marcello
    D'Ovidio, Gino
    Celli, Daniele
    Pasquali, Davide
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR THE SEA; LEARNING TO MEASURE SEA HEALTH PARAMETERS (METROSEA), 2018, : 23 - 27
  • [22] Using remotely operated and autonomous underwater vehicles for archaeological survey and excavation
    Yoerger, DR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY, 1996, 100 (02) : 363 - 364
  • [23] Dynamic surface fault tolerant control for underwater remotely operated vehicles
    Baldini, Alessandro
    Ciabattoni, Lucio
    Felicetti, Riccardo
    Ferracuti, Francesco
    Freddi, Alessandro
    Monteriu, Andrea
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2018, 78 : 10 - 20
  • [24] Position Tracking Control of Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicles With Communication Delay
    Yan, Jing
    Gao, Jin
    Yang, Xian
    Luo, Xiaoyuan
    Guan, Xinping
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 28 (06) : 2506 - 2514
  • [25] Dexterous Underwater Manipulation from Onshore Locations Streamlining Efficiencies for Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicles
    Birk, Andreas
    Doernbach, Tobias
    Mueller, Christian Atanas
    Luczynski, Tomasz
    Chavez, Arturo Gomez
    Koehntopp, Daniel
    Kupcsik, Andras
    Calinon, Sylvain
    Tanwani, Ajay K.
    Antonelli, Gianluca
    di Lillo, Paolo
    Simetti, Enrico
    Casalino, Giuseppe
    Indiveri, Giovanni
    Ostuni, Luigi
    Turetta, Alessio
    Caffaz, Andrea
    Weiss, Peter
    Gobert, Thibaud
    Chemisky, Bertrand
    Gancet, Jeremi
    Siedel, Torsten
    Govindaraj, Shashank
    Martinez, Xavier
    Letier, Pierre
    IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2018, 25 (04) : 24 - 33
  • [26] MATHEMATICAL MODEL & ROBOT DESIGN OF AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES (AUV) AND REMOTELY OPERATED VEHICLES (ROV)
    Farkas, Felix-Attila
    Kalman, Kacso
    Cigan, Vlad
    Cazan, Rares
    Vuscan, Gheorghe Ioan
    ACTA TECHNICA NAPOCENSIS SERIES-APPLIED MATHEMATICS MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 55 (02): : 413 - 418
  • [27] THETIS: an underwater remotely operated vehicle for water pollution measurements
    Lygouras, JN
    Lalakos, KA
    Tsalides, PG
    MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, 1998, 22 (05) : 227 - 237
  • [29] High-speed on/off control for remotely operated underwater vehicles propulsion
    Zhu, Kangwu
    Chen, Yuanjie
    Li, Wei
    Wang, Feng
    Gu, Linyi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLUID POWER TRANSMISSION AND CONTROL, 2009, : 74 - 81
  • [30] Object detection/tracking toward underwater photographs by remotely operated vehicles (ROVs)
    Zhang, Lanyong
    Li, Chengyu
    Sun, Hongfang
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2022, 126 : 163 - 168