A Landscape Approach to Invasive Species Management

被引:22
|
作者
Lurgi, Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Wells, Konstans [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kennedy, Malcolm [4 ]
Campbell, Susan [5 ]
Fordham, Damien A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Inst Environm, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biol Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Environm Futures Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
[4] Western Australia, Dept Agr & Food, 3 Baron Hay Ct, S Perth, WA 6151, Australia
[5] Western Australia, Dept Agr & Food, 444 Albany Hwy, Albany, WA 6330, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 07期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
ORYCTOLAGUS-CUNICULUS; RIPPING PROGRAMS; POPULATION; CONSERVATION; RABBITS; PATTERNS; DETERMINANTS; DISPERSAL; STABILITY; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0160417
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Biological invasions are not only a major threat to biodiversity, they also have major impacts on local economies and agricultural production systems. Once established, the connection of local populations into metapopulation networks facilitates dispersal at landscape scales, generating spatial dynamics that can impact the outcome of pest-management actions. Much planning goes into landscape-scale invasive species management. However, effective management requires knowledge on the interplay between metapopulation network topology and management actions. We address this knowledge gap using simulation models to explore the effectiveness of two common management strategies, applied across different extents and according to different rules for selecting target localities in metapopulations with different network topologies. These management actions are: (i) general population reduction, and (ii) reduction of an obligate resource. The reduction of an obligate resource was generally more efficient than population reduction for depleting populations at landscape scales. However, the way in which local populations are selected for management is important when the topology of the metapopulation is heterogeneous in terms of the distribution of connections among local populations. We tested these broad findings using real-world scenarios of European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) infesting agricultural landscapes in Western Australia. Although management strategies targeting central populations were more effective in simulated heterogeneous metapopulation structures, no difference was observed in real-world metapopulation structures that are highly homogeneous. In large metapopulations with high proximity and connectivity of neighbouring populations, different spatial management strategies yield similar outcomes. Directly considering spatial attributes in pest-management actions will be most important for metapopulation networks with heterogeneously distributed links. Our modelling framework provides a simple approach for identifying the best possible management strategy for invasive species based on metapopulation structure and control capacity. This information can be used by managers trying to devise efficient landscape-oriented management strategies for invasive species and can also generate insights for conservation purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Public Reaction to Invasive Plant Species in a Disturbed Colorado Landscape
    Daab, Michael T.
    Flint, Courtney G.
    INVASIVE PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 3 (04) : 390 - 401
  • [42] Landscape diversity slows the spread of an invasive forest pest species
    Rigot, Thibaud
    van Halder, Inge
    Jactel, Herve
    ECOGRAPHY, 2014, 37 (07) : 648 - 658
  • [43] Landscape Position Influences the Distribution of Garlic Mustard, an Invasive Species
    Burls, Kevin
    McClaugherty, Charles
    NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST, 2008, 15 (04) : 541 - 556
  • [44] The Death and Life of Ash: Landscape Tactics to Adapt to Invasive Species
    Zhong, Sijia
    Wirth, Gena
    ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION, 2022, 40 (02) : 123 - 127
  • [45] A Bayesian State-Space Approach for Invasive Species Management: The Case of Spotted Wing Drosophila
    Fan, Xiaoli
    Gomez, Miguel I.
    Atallah, Shady S.
    Conrad, Jon M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 102 (04) : 1227 - 1244
  • [46] Identifying opportunities for invasive species management: an empirical study of stakeholder perceptions and interest in invasive species
    Kleespies, Matthias Winfried
    Doerge, Dorian D.
    Peter, Norbert
    Schantz, Anna V.
    Skaljic, Ajdin
    Feucht, Viktoria
    Burger-Schulz, Anna Lena
    Dierkes, Paul Wilhelm
    Klimpel, Sven
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2024, 26 (08) : 2561 - 2577
  • [47] Strategies for the Management of Aggressive Invasive Plant Species
    Lorenzo, Paula
    Morais, Maria Cristina
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (13):
  • [48] The importance of bioeconomic feedback in invasive species management
    Finnoff, D
    Shogren, JF
    Leung, B
    Lodge, D
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 52 (03) : 367 - 381
  • [49] Animal personhood meets invasive species management
    Simberloff, Daniel
    Keim, Brandon
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2025, 27 (03)
  • [50] The contribution of passive surveillance to invasive species management
    Hester, Susan M.
    Cacho, Oscar J.
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2017, 19 (03) : 737 - 748