A Landscape Approach to Invasive Species Management

被引:22
|
作者
Lurgi, Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Wells, Konstans [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kennedy, Malcolm [4 ]
Campbell, Susan [5 ]
Fordham, Damien A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Inst Environm, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biol Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Environm Futures Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
[4] Western Australia, Dept Agr & Food, 3 Baron Hay Ct, S Perth, WA 6151, Australia
[5] Western Australia, Dept Agr & Food, 444 Albany Hwy, Albany, WA 6330, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 07期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
ORYCTOLAGUS-CUNICULUS; RIPPING PROGRAMS; POPULATION; CONSERVATION; RABBITS; PATTERNS; DETERMINANTS; DISPERSAL; STABILITY; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0160417
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Biological invasions are not only a major threat to biodiversity, they also have major impacts on local economies and agricultural production systems. Once established, the connection of local populations into metapopulation networks facilitates dispersal at landscape scales, generating spatial dynamics that can impact the outcome of pest-management actions. Much planning goes into landscape-scale invasive species management. However, effective management requires knowledge on the interplay between metapopulation network topology and management actions. We address this knowledge gap using simulation models to explore the effectiveness of two common management strategies, applied across different extents and according to different rules for selecting target localities in metapopulations with different network topologies. These management actions are: (i) general population reduction, and (ii) reduction of an obligate resource. The reduction of an obligate resource was generally more efficient than population reduction for depleting populations at landscape scales. However, the way in which local populations are selected for management is important when the topology of the metapopulation is heterogeneous in terms of the distribution of connections among local populations. We tested these broad findings using real-world scenarios of European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) infesting agricultural landscapes in Western Australia. Although management strategies targeting central populations were more effective in simulated heterogeneous metapopulation structures, no difference was observed in real-world metapopulation structures that are highly homogeneous. In large metapopulations with high proximity and connectivity of neighbouring populations, different spatial management strategies yield similar outcomes. Directly considering spatial attributes in pest-management actions will be most important for metapopulation networks with heterogeneously distributed links. Our modelling framework provides a simple approach for identifying the best possible management strategy for invasive species based on metapopulation structure and control capacity. This information can be used by managers trying to devise efficient landscape-oriented management strategies for invasive species and can also generate insights for conservation purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Network Governance for Invasive Species Management
    Lubell, Mark
    Jasny, Lorien
    Hastings, Alan
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (06): : 699 - 707
  • [22] Economics of invasive species policy and management
    Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S.
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2017, 19 (11) : 3333 - 3354
  • [23] Rigid laws and invasive species management
    Oficialdegui, Francisco J.
    Delibes-Mateos, Miguel
    Green, Andy J.
    Sanchez, Marta I.
    Boyero, Luz
    Clavero, Miguel
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (04) : 1047 - 1050
  • [24] Economics of invasive species policy and management
    Rebecca S. Epanchin-Niell
    Biological Invasions, 2017, 19 : 3333 - 3354
  • [25] The economic benefits of invasive species management
    Hanley, Nick
    Roberts, Michaela
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2019, 1 (02) : 124 - 137
  • [26] Learning and linking for invasive species management
    Nourani, Sally W.
    Krasny, Marianne E.
    Decker, Daniel J.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (03):
  • [27] Management priorities for marine invasive species
    Giakoumi, Sylvaine
    Katsanevakis, Stelios
    Albano, Paolo G.
    Azzurro, Ernesto
    Cardoso, Ana Cristina
    Cebrian, Emma
    Deiduni, Alan
    Edelist, Dor
    Francour, Patrice
    Jimenez, Carlos
    Macic, Vesna
    Occhipinti-Ambrogi, Anna
    Rilov, Gil
    Sghaier, Yassine Ramzi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 688 : 976 - 982
  • [28] Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies
    Milne, David H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE, 2005, 7 (01) : 55 - 56
  • [29] Diversity in invasive species management networks
    Abeysinghe, Nisansala
    O'Bryan, Christopher J.
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    McDonald-Madden, Eve
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 365
  • [30] Science and economics in the management of an invasive species
    Hoagland, Porter
    Jin, Di
    BIOSCIENCE, 2006, 56 (11) : 931 - 935