Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Ability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector Row Computed Tomography for Anomalous Pancreaticobiliary Ductal Junction

被引:3
|
作者
Nakamoto, Atsushi [1 ]
Kim, Tonsok [1 ]
Hori, Masatoshi [1 ]
Onishi, Hiromitsu [1 ]
Nakaya, Yasuhiro [2 ]
Tsuboyama, Takahiro [1 ]
Tatsumi, Mitsuaki [1 ]
Tomoda, Kaname [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Nishinomiya Municipal Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction; MR imaging; multidetector row CT; MULTIPLANAR REFORMATTED IMAGES; CHOLEDOCHAL CYSTS; MR CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; CT; VISUALIZATION; MALJUNCTION; REFLUX; UNION;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181e23ff2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for an anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction (PBJ). Methods: This study included 26 patients who underwent MR imaging, MDCT, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Seventeen of the patients were diagnosed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as having an anomalous PBJ. Three radiologists independently reviewed MR images alone, contrast-enhanced CT images alone, and MR images and CT images combined. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare diagnostic capabilities. Results: The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az [95% confidence interval]) was 0.75 (0.73-0.77) for MR imaging alone, 0.79 (0.70-0.89) for CT alone, and 0.84 (0.82-0.86) for the 2 modalities combined. Only between the combination and MR imaging alone was there significant difference in Az value (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of MR imaging and MDCT was equivalent for an anomalous PBJ. The addition of MDCT to MR imaging improved the diagnostic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 731
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biliary ductal involvement of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Multidetector computed tomography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography
    Cho, Eun-Suk
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Yu, Jeong-Sik
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Kim, Ki Whang
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (01) : 72 - 78
  • [22] Efficacy of multidetector row computed tomography of the spine in patients with multiple myeloma: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography
    Hur, Jin
    Yoon, Choon-Sik
    Ryu, Young Hoon
    Yun, Mi Jin
    Suh, Jin-Suck
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (03) : 342 - 347
  • [23] Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Value Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for Patients with Osteosarcoma
    Zhao, Shuangquan
    Zeng, Daohui
    Song, Jianxun
    Liang, Jiuping
    Zhou, Yongsheng
    Zhu, Yi
    Xu, Lu
    Cheng, Guanxun
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2018, 8 (02) : 295 - 298
  • [24] Computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic possibilities in dentistry
    Schulze, Ralf Kurt Willy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY & OCCLUSION MEDICINE, 2011, 4 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [25] Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging features
    Tamm, Eric P.
    Bhosale, Priya R.
    Lee, Jeffrey H.
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2007, 28 (05) : 330 - 338
  • [26] Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans
    Veldhoen, Simon
    Schoellchen, Maximilian
    Hanken, H.
    Precht, C.
    Henes, F. O.
    Schoen, G.
    Nagel, H. D.
    Schumacher, U.
    Heiland, M.
    Adam, G.
    Regier, M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) : 790 - 800
  • [27] Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans
    Simon Veldhoen
    Maximilian Schöllchen
    H. Hanken
    C. Precht
    F. O. Henes
    G. Schön
    H. D. Nagel
    U. Schumacher
    M. Heiland
    G. Adam
    M. Regier
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 790 - 800
  • [28] The emerging role of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography in the diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy
    Massimo Slavich
    Anca Florian
    Jan Bogaert
    Insights into Imaging, 2011, 2 (4) : 453 - 469
  • [29] Is multidetector computed tomography comparable to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lumbar foraminal stenosis?
    Kang, Woo Young
    Ahn, Joong Mo
    Lee, Joon Woo
    Lee, Eugene
    Bae, Yun Jung
    Seo, Jiwoon
    Kim, Junghoon
    Kang, Heung Sik
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (02) : 197 - 203
  • [30] Magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary infection in immunocompromised children: comparison with multidetector computed tomography
    Ozcan, H. Nursun
    Gormez, Aysegul
    Ozsurekci, Yasemin
    Karakaya, Jale
    Oguz, Berna
    Unal, Sule
    Cetin, Mualla
    Ceyhan, Mehmet
    Haliloglu, Mithat
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 47 (02) : 146 - 153