Protein structure prediction using deep learning distance and hydrogen-bonding restraints in CASP14

被引:42
|
作者
Zheng, Wei [1 ]
Li, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Chengxin [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaogen [1 ]
Pearce, Robin [1 ]
Bell, Eric W. [1 ]
Huang, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
Zhang, Yang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Computat Med & Bioinformat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Biol Chem, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ab initio folding; CASP14; deep learning; domain partition; multiple sequence alignment; protein structure prediction; residue-residue distance prediction; FOLD-RECOGNITION; I-TASSER; SIMILARITY; SERVER;
D O I
10.1002/prot.26193
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this article, we report 3D structure prediction results by two of our best server groups ("Zhang-Server" and "QUARK") in CASP14. These two servers were built based on the D-I-TASSER and D-QUARK algorithms, which integrated four newly developed components into the classical protein folding pipelines, I-TASSER and QUARK, respectively. The new components include: (a) a new multiple sequence alignment (MSA) collection tool, DeepMSA2, which is extended from the DeepMSA program; (b) a contact-based domain boundary prediction algorithm, FUpred, to detect protein domain boundaries; (c) a residual convolutional neural network-based method, DeepPotential, to predict multiple spatial restraints by co-evolutionary features derived from the MSA; and (d) optimized spatial restraint energy potentials to guide the structure assembly simulations. For 37 FM targets, the average TM-scores of the first models produced by D-I-TASSER and D-QUARK were 96% and 112% higher than those constructed by I-TASSER and QUARK, respectively. The data analysis indicates noticeable improvements produced by each of the four new components, especially for the newly added spatial restraints from DeepPotential and the well-tuned force field that combines spatial restraints, threading templates, and generic knowledge-based potentials. However, challenges still exist in the current pipelines. These include difficulties in modeling multi-domain proteins due to low accuracy in inter-domain distance prediction and modeling protein domains from oligomer complexes, as the co-evolutionary analysis cannot distinguish inter-chain and intra-chain distances. Specifically tuning the deep learning-based predictors for multi-domain targets and protein complexes may be helpful to address these issues.
引用
收藏
页码:1734 / 1751
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TOPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF HYDROGEN-BONDING IN PROTEIN-STRUCTURE
    MAO, B
    CHOU, KC
    MAGGIORA, GM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1990, 188 (02): : 361 - 365
  • [22] Structure prediction using sparse simulated NOE restraints with Rosetta in CASP11
    Ovchinnikov, Sergey
    Park, Hahnbeom
    Kim, David E.
    Liu, Yuan
    Wang, Ray Yu-Ruei
    Baker, David
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 84 : 181 - 188
  • [23] Study of real-valued distance prediction for protein structure prediction with deep learning
    Li, Jin
    Xu, Jinbo
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 37 (19) : 3197 - 3203
  • [24] Deep-learning contact-map guided protein structure prediction in CASP13
    Zheng, Wei
    Li, Yang
    Zhang, Chengxin
    Pearce, Robin
    Mortuza, S. M.
    Zhang, Yang
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 87 (12) : 1149 - 1164
  • [25] Protein structure prediction using Rosetta in CASP12
    Ovchinnikov, Sergey
    Park, Hahnbeom
    Kim, David E.
    DiMaio, Frank
    Baker, David
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 86 : 113 - 121
  • [26] Protein structure prediction using multiple deep neural networks in the 13th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13)
    Senior, Andrew W.
    Evans, Richard
    Jumper, John
    Kirkpatrick, James
    Sifre, Laurent
    Green, Tim
    Qin, Chongli
    Zidek, Augustin
    Nelson, Alexander W. R.
    Bridgland, Alex
    Penedones, Hugo
    Petersen, Stig
    Simonyan, Karen
    Crossan, Steve
    Kohli, Pushmeet
    Jones, David T.
    Silver, David
    Kavukcuoglu, Koray
    Hassabis, Demis
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 87 (12) : 1141 - 1148
  • [27] Protein secondary structure prediction by using deep learning method
    Wang, Yangxu
    Mao, Hua
    Yi, Zhang
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 118 : 115 - 123
  • [28] Analysis of deep learning methods for blind protein contact prediction in CASP12
    Wang, Sheng
    Sun, Siqi
    Xu, Jinbo
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 86 : 67 - 77
  • [29] Protein structure prediction in CASP6 using CHIMERA and FAMS
    Takeda-Shitaka, M
    Terashi, G
    Takaya, D
    Kanou, K
    Iwadate, M
    Umeyama, H
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 61 : 122 - 127
  • [30] Glycerol Hydrogen-Bonding Network Dominates Structure and Collective Dynamics in a Deep Eutectic Solvent
    Faraone, A.
    Wagel, D. V.
    Baker, G. A.
    Novak, E. C.
    Ohl, M.
    Reuter, D.
    Lunkenheimer, P.
    Loidl, A.
    Mamontov, E.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2018, 122 (03): : 1261 - 1267