Response analysis and optimization of the air spring with epistemic uncertainties

被引:3
|
作者
Kong, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Xifeng [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Zhaijun [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Shengwen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Dept Transportat Equipment & Control Engn, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Traff Safety Track, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
evidence theory; arbitrary orthogonal polynomial; sparse grid quadrature; optimization; air spring; EXPANSION APPROACH; SYSTEMS; QUANTIFICATION; PREDICTION; MODEL; FIELD;
D O I
10.1515/rams-2022-0008
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Traditional methods for the optimization design of the air spring are based on the deterministic assumption that the parameters are fixed. However, uncertainties widely exist during the manufacturing stage of the air spring. To model the uncertainties in air springs, evidence theory is introduced. For the response analysis of the air spring system under evidence theory, an evidence theory-based polynomial chaos method, called the sparse grid quadrature-based arbitrary orthogonal polynomial (SGQ-AOP) method, is proposed. In the SGQ-AOP method, the response of the air spring is approximated by AOP expansion, and the sparse grid quadrature is introduced to calculate the expansion coefficient. For optimization of the air spring, a reliability-based optimization model is established under evidence theory. To improve the efficiency of optimization, the SGQ-AOP method is used to establish the surrogate model for the response of the air spring. The proposed response analysis and the optimization method were employed to optimize an air spring with epistemic uncertainties, and its effectiveness has been demonstrated by comparing it with the traditional evidence theory-based AOP method.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A novel method for importance measure analysis in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    Ren Bo
    Lu Zhenzhou
    Zhou Changcong
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2014, (03) : 568 - 576
  • [32] An Efficient Orthogonal Polynomial Method for Auxetic Structure Analysis with Epistemic Uncertainties
    Yin, Shengwen
    Qin, Haogang
    Gao, Qiang
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL APPLICATIONS, 2022, 27 (03)
  • [33] Analysis of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in the context of a dynamic fire-PSA
    Kloos, M
    Haider, C
    Hofer, E
    Peschke, J
    Röwekamp, M
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 1423 - 1428
  • [34] Handling epistemic uncertainties in fault tree analysis by probabilistic and possibilistic approaches
    Flage, R.
    Baraldi, P.
    Ameruso, F.
    Zio, E.
    Aven, T.
    RELIABILITY, RISK AND SAFETY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 1761 - +
  • [35] Vibration Analysis of Fluid-Filled Piping Systems with Epistemic Uncertainties
    Hanss, M.
    Herrmann, J.
    Haag, T.
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON THE VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES WITH UNCERTAINTIES, 2011, 27 : 43 - 56
  • [36] A Decoupling Strategy for Reliability Analysis of Multidisciplinary System with Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties
    Fu, Chao
    Liu, Jihong
    Xu, Wenting
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (15):
  • [37] Analysis and optimization of the flexure spring
    Zhang, YL
    Lu, Q
    CRYOGENICS AND REFRIGERATION - PROCEEDINGS OF ICCR'2003, 2003, : 781 - 784
  • [38] Epistemic Uncertainties in Component Fragility Functions
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2010, 26 (01) : 41 - 62
  • [39] Reliability-Based Analysis and Optimization of the Gravity Balancing Performance of Spring-Articulated Serial Robots With Uncertainties
    Nguyen, Vu Linh
    Kuo, Chin-Hsing
    Lin, Po Ting
    JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 14 (03):
  • [40] Analysis and Optimization of Suspension Spring Stiffness for Improving Frequency Response Characteristics of the Vehicle
    Gao, Jin
    Han, Peifeng
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022