Response analysis and optimization of the air spring with epistemic uncertainties

被引:3
|
作者
Kong, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Xifeng [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Zhaijun [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Shengwen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Dept Transportat Equipment & Control Engn, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Traff Safety Track, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
evidence theory; arbitrary orthogonal polynomial; sparse grid quadrature; optimization; air spring; EXPANSION APPROACH; SYSTEMS; QUANTIFICATION; PREDICTION; MODEL; FIELD;
D O I
10.1515/rams-2022-0008
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Traditional methods for the optimization design of the air spring are based on the deterministic assumption that the parameters are fixed. However, uncertainties widely exist during the manufacturing stage of the air spring. To model the uncertainties in air springs, evidence theory is introduced. For the response analysis of the air spring system under evidence theory, an evidence theory-based polynomial chaos method, called the sparse grid quadrature-based arbitrary orthogonal polynomial (SGQ-AOP) method, is proposed. In the SGQ-AOP method, the response of the air spring is approximated by AOP expansion, and the sparse grid quadrature is introduced to calculate the expansion coefficient. For optimization of the air spring, a reliability-based optimization model is established under evidence theory. To improve the efficiency of optimization, the SGQ-AOP method is used to establish the surrogate model for the response of the air spring. The proposed response analysis and the optimization method were employed to optimize an air spring with epistemic uncertainties, and its effectiveness has been demonstrated by comparing it with the traditional evidence theory-based AOP method.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Regional sensitivity analysis of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties on failure probability
    Li, Guijie
    Lu, Zhenzhou
    Lu, Zhaoyan
    Xu, Jia
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2014, 46 (02) : 209 - 226
  • [22] Reliability analysis for multidisciplinary systems with the mixture of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    Tao, Y. R.
    Han, X.
    Duan, S. Y.
    Jiang, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 97 (01) : 68 - 78
  • [23] Epistemic uncertainties in decision making
    Faber, Michael Havbro
    Maes, Marc A.
    Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol 2, 2005, : 115 - 122
  • [24] Dynamic characteristic analysis and key parameter optimization of throttling orifice type air damping air spring
    Chen, Junjie
    Huang, Ziqi
    Kang, Sheng
    Yang, Qin
    Yuan, Xianju
    Huang, Peng
    Gan, Yu Feng
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 35 (10)
  • [25] Response to: "Enhancing the Characterization of Epistemic Uncertainties in PM2.5 Risk Analyses"
    Fann, Neal L.
    Lamson, Amy D.
    Luben, Tom J.
    Hubbell, Bryan J.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2015, 35 (03) : 379 - 380
  • [26] 'The future is fuzzy' - An approach to comprehensive modeling and analysis of systems with epistemic uncertainties
    Hanss, M.
    Turrin, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF LSAME.08: LEUVEN SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED MECHANICS IN ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 511 - 521
  • [27] A novel method for importance measure analysis in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    Ren Bo
    Lu Zhenzhou
    Zhou Changcong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2014, 27 (03) : 568 - 576
  • [28] Multidisciplinary Statistical Sensitivity Analysis Considering Both Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties
    Jiang, Zhen
    Chen, Wei
    German, Brian J.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2016, 54 (04) : 1326 - 1338
  • [29] A novel method for importance measure analysis in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    Ren Bo
    Lu Zhenzhou
    Zhou Changcong
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2014, 27 (03) : 568 - 576
  • [30] A novel method for importance measure analysis in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    Lu, Zhenzhou (zhenzhoulu@nwpu.edu.cn), 1600, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics (27):