Response analysis and optimization of the air spring with epistemic uncertainties

被引:3
|
作者
Kong, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Xifeng [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Zhaijun [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Shengwen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Dept Transportat Equipment & Control Engn, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Traff Safety Track, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
evidence theory; arbitrary orthogonal polynomial; sparse grid quadrature; optimization; air spring; EXPANSION APPROACH; SYSTEMS; QUANTIFICATION; PREDICTION; MODEL; FIELD;
D O I
10.1515/rams-2022-0008
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Traditional methods for the optimization design of the air spring are based on the deterministic assumption that the parameters are fixed. However, uncertainties widely exist during the manufacturing stage of the air spring. To model the uncertainties in air springs, evidence theory is introduced. For the response analysis of the air spring system under evidence theory, an evidence theory-based polynomial chaos method, called the sparse grid quadrature-based arbitrary orthogonal polynomial (SGQ-AOP) method, is proposed. In the SGQ-AOP method, the response of the air spring is approximated by AOP expansion, and the sparse grid quadrature is introduced to calculate the expansion coefficient. For optimization of the air spring, a reliability-based optimization model is established under evidence theory. To improve the efficiency of optimization, the SGQ-AOP method is used to establish the surrogate model for the response of the air spring. The proposed response analysis and the optimization method were employed to optimize an air spring with epistemic uncertainties, and its effectiveness has been demonstrated by comparing it with the traditional evidence theory-based AOP method.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design Optimization Under Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties
    Wei, Juan
    Yang, Bo
    Liu, Wei
    EIGHTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 491 - +
  • [2] ON THE ROBUSTNESS OF STRUCTURAL RISK OPTIMIZATION WITH RESPECT TO EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTIES
    Beck, Andre T.
    Gomes, W. J. S.
    Bazan, F. A. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2012, 2 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [3] RELIABLE DESIGN OPTIMIZATION UNDER ALEATORY AND EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTIES
    Samson, Sundeep
    Thoomu, Sravya
    Fadel, Georges
    Reneke, James
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 5, PTS A AND B: 35TH DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE, 2010, : 1093 - 1104
  • [4] An Efficient Polynomial Chaos Method for Stiffness Analysis of Air Spring Considering Uncertainties
    Kong, Feng
    Si, Penghao
    Yin, Shengwen
    COMPLEXITY, 2021, 2021
  • [5] An approximate epistemic uncertainty analysis approach in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    Hofer, E
    Kloos, M
    Krzykacz-Hausmann, B
    Peschke, J
    Woltereck, M
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 77 (03) : 229 - 238
  • [6] Sensitivity analysis with mixture of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
    Guo, Jia
    Du, Xiaoping
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2007, 45 (09) : 2337 - 2349
  • [7] Design Optimization With Discrete and Continuous Variables of Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties
    Huang, Hong-Zhong
    Zhang, Xudong
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2009, 131 (03) : 0310061 - 0310068
  • [8] Stiffness analysis and structural optimization design of an air spring for ships
    Cheng, Yuqiang
    Gao, Hua
    Ma, Jianguo
    Shuai, Changgeng
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [9] Evidence-theory-based structural static and dynamic response analysis under epistemic uncertainties
    Bai, Y. C.
    Jiang, C.
    Han, X.
    Hu, D. A.
    FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2013, 68 : 52 - 62
  • [10] Sequential optimization and reliability assessment for multidisciplinary design optimization under aleatory and epistemic uncertainties
    Xudong Zhang
    Hong-Zhong Huang
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 40 : 165 - 175