Examining the association between short interpregnancy interval births and the type and timing of postpartum long acting reversible contraception

被引:8
|
作者
Rodriguez, Maria I. [1 ,2 ]
Skye, Megan [1 ]
Ramanadhan, Shaalini [1 ]
Schrote, Kaitlin [1 ]
Darney, Blair G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Ctr Hlth Syst Effectiveness, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] OHSU PSU Sch Publ Hlth, Portland, OR USA
[4] Natl Inst Publ Hlth INSP, Ctr Populat Hlth Res CISP, Cuernavaca, Mexico
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Interpregnancy intervals; LARC; Intrauterine device; Implant; Immediate postpartum contraception; DELIVERY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2021.12.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether the type (intrauterine device or implant) or timing (immediately post -partum vs interval) of postpartum long-acting reversible contraception was associated with a reduction in short interpregnancy interval births. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Medicaid claims and birth certifi-cate data from Oregon and South Carolina, 2010 to 2018. Our primary outcome was short interpregnancy interval, defined as repeat pregnancy within 18 months of the index delivery. We determined postpartum contraceptive method and timing of receipt. To assess the association of timing of long acting reversible contraception with short interpregnancy interval, we calculated adjusted probabilities from a logistic re-gression model incorporating covariate balanced propensity score weights, sociodemographic factors, and clustered at the woman-level. Results: Our study sample included 121,422 births to 97,084 individuals who had more than 1 birth during the study period; 41% had a short interpregnancy interval. A majority of individuals had not re-ceived any contraception by 6 months postpartum (68.6%). Overall, 15,477 individuals used long acting reversible contraception postpartum, with the majority receiving interval rather than immediate post -partum long acting reversible contraception (92.9% vs 7.1%). In multivariable analyses, both immediate postpartum (23.0%, 95% CI: 20.5%-25.8%) and interval long acting reversible contraception (15.2%, 95% CI: 14.4%-16.1%) are associated with a lower probability of short interpregnancy interval than short acting methods (42.1%, 95% CI: 41.2%-43.0%). Conclusion: Compared to short-acting methods, receipt of both immediate postpartum and interval long-acting reversible contraception is associated with lower probabilities of a subsequent short interpreg-nancy interval. Implications: All long acting, reversible contraception, whether placed immediately postpartum or on an interval basis, was associated with a significantly lower probability of a short interpregnancy interval than short acting or no contraceptive method. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adolescents' Intention to Use Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Postpartum
    Madorsky, Toni Z.
    Stritzel, Haley
    Sheeder, Jeanelle
    Maslowsky, Julie
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 37 (05) : 510 - 515
  • [22] Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: the time is now
    Moniz, Michelle
    Chang, Tammy
    Heisler, Michele
    Dalton, Vanessa K.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2017, 95 (04) : 335 - 338
  • [23] Factors associated with postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception
    Oduyebo, Titilope
    Zapata, Lauren B.
    Boutot, Maegan E.
    Tepper, Naomi K.
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    D'Angelo, Denise V.
    Marchbanks, Polly A.
    Whiteman, Maura K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (01) : 43.e1 - 43.e11
  • [24] Implementing Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Programs
    Hofler, Lisa G.
    Cordes, Sarah
    Cwiak, Carrie A.
    Goedken, Peggy
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Kottke, Melissa
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (01): : 3 - 9
  • [25] Implementing Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Programs
    McHugh, Katherine W.
    Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker
    Ferries-Rowe, Elizabeth
    Haas, David M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (06): : 1136 - 1137
  • [26] Increasing Access to Contraception: Examining Barriers and Facilitators of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Kroelinger, Charlan D.
    Pagano, H. Pamela
    DeSisto, Carla L.
    Estrich, Cameron
    Romero, Lisa
    Pliska, Ellen
    Akbarali, Sanaa
    Velonis, Alisa
    Cox, Shanna
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 33 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [27] Association of Medicaid Reimbursement for Immediate Postpartum Long-acting Reversible Contraception With Infant Birth Outcomes
    Steenland, Maria W.
    Pace, Lydia E.
    Cohen, Jessica L.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2022, 176 (03) : 296 - 303
  • [28] Changes in Short Interpregnancy Interval Rates and Association With State-Level Access to Contraception
    Patel, Kriya
    Bakk, Juliana
    Pensak, Meredith
    DeFranco, Emily
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 103S - 104S
  • [29] Condom Use With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception vs Non-Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Hormonal Methods Among Postpartum Adolescents
    Kortsmit, Katherine
    Williams, Letitia
    Pazol, Karen
    Smith, Ruben A.
    Whiteman, Maura
    Barfield, Wanda
    Koumans, Emilia
    Kourtis, Athena
    Harrison, Leslie
    Bauman, Brenda
    Warner, Lee
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2019, 173 (07) : 663 - 670
  • [30] Making Contraception Accessible Through Implementation of Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Fenner, Tania
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2019, 48 (03): : S12 - S13