Condom Use With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception vs Non-Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Hormonal Methods Among Postpartum Adolescents

被引:14
|
作者
Kortsmit, Katherine [1 ,2 ]
Williams, Letitia [1 ]
Pazol, Karen [1 ]
Smith, Ruben A. [1 ]
Whiteman, Maura [1 ]
Barfield, Wanda [1 ]
Koumans, Emilia [1 ]
Kourtis, Athena [3 ]
Harrison, Leslie [1 ]
Bauman, Brenda [1 ]
Warner, Lee [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Reprod Hlth, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, 4770 Buford Hwy NE,Bldg 107 MS F-74, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Res Participat Program, Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Healthcare Qual Promot, Natl Ctr Emerging & Zoonot Infect Dis, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS; MONITORING-SYSTEM PRAMS; UNITED-STATES; YOUNG-WOMEN; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; TRENDS; CONSEQUENCES; SERVICES; BEHAVIOR; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1136
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Increased use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; intrauterine devices [IUDs] and implants) has likely contributed to declining US teenage pregnancy and birth rates, yet sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates among teenagers remain high. While LARC methods are highly effective for pregnancy prevention, they, as with all nonbarrier methods, do not protect against STIs, including HIV. Studies of the general adolescent population suggest condom use is lower among LARC vs non-LARC hormonal methods users (birth control pill, contraceptive patch, vaginal ring, or injection). Despite the high use of LARC among postpartum teenagers, no studies have examined whether condom use differs by contraceptive method in this population. OBJECTIVE To compare condom use among sexually active postpartum teenagers using LARC vs those using non-LARC hormonal methods. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional analysis using 2012 to 2015 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), a multisite and population-based surveillance system that collects data on maternal attitudes, behaviors, and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy. We used data from 37 sites. Using multivariable survey-weighted logistic regression, we assessed the association of condom use by contraceptive methods. Participants were teenage mothers (<19 years) with a recent live birth reporting LARC or non-LARC hormonal method use. Data were analyzed between March 2018 and April 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Condom use with LARC vs condom use with non-LARC hormonal methods. RESULTS Among the 5480 (weighted N = 245 847) postpartum teenage mothers in our sample, most were aged 18 to 19 years, unmarried, had current Medicaid coverage, were first-time mothers, had reported their pregnancy was unintended, and almost half were non-Hispanic white. Overall, condom use was reported by 28.8% of these teenagers. Users of LARC compared with non-LARC hormonal methods were half as likely to use condoms (17.8% vs 35.6%; adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.41-0.60). Users of IUDs (15.1%) were less likely to report condom use than those using an implant (21.5%; aPR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.98), patch, ring, or injection users (24.9%; aPR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79), and pill users (47.2%; aPR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.25-0.40). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Self-reported condom use was low overall among postpartum teenage mothers and lower among users of LARC vs non-LARC hormonal methods. Given the high rates of STIs among teenage mothers combined with higher use of LARC among postpartum teenaged mothers, interventions to promote condom use for STI/HIV prevention during the postpartum period are critically important.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 670
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adolescents' Intention to Use Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Postpartum
    Madorsky, Toni Z.
    Stritzel, Haley
    Sheeder, Jeanelle
    Maslowsky, Julie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 37 (05) : 510 - 515
  • [2] CONDOM USE AND DISCONTINUATION AMONG ADOLESCENTS USING LONG-ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION
    Loh, Miranda
    Niu, Li
    Arden, Martha
    Schlecht, Nicolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2022, 70 (04) : S53 - S53
  • [3] Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents
    McNicholas, Colleen
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 24 (05) : 293 - 298
  • [4] Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Adolescents
    Morrell, Kathleen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 25 (06) : 407 - 409
  • [5] Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents
    Moreno, Megan A.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2016, 170 (05) : 516 - 516
  • [6] Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Borders, Ann E.
    Stuebe, Alison M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (02): : E32 - E37
  • [7] Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents A Review
    Francis, Jenny K. R.
    Gold, Melanie A.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2017, 171 (07) : 694 - 701
  • [8] Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 63 (04) : 499 - 500
  • [9] Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Baker, Courtney C.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (05): : 883 - 897
  • [10] Long-acting reversible contraception
    Wilkes, Scott
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (614): : 463 - 463