Comparison of Direct and Video Laryngoscopes during Different Airway Scenarios Performed by Experienced Paramedics: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study

被引:6
|
作者
Ruetzler, Kurt [1 ,2 ]
Szarpak, Lukasz [3 ]
Smereka, Jacek [4 ]
Dabrowski, Marek [5 ]
Bialka, Szymon [6 ]
Mosteller, Lauretta [2 ]
Szarpak, Agnieszka [7 ]
Ludwin, Kobi [7 ]
Wojewodzka-Zelezniakowicz, Marzena [8 ]
Ladny, Jerzy Robert [8 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Gen Anesthesiol, Inst Anesthesiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Outcomes Res, Inst Anesthesiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Lazarski Univ, Med Simulat Ctr, Swieradowska 43, Warsaw, Poland
[4] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Emergency Med Serv, Parkowa 34, Wroclaw, Poland
[5] Poznan Univ Med Sci, Chair & Dept Med Educ, Dabrowskiego 12, Poznan, Poland
[6] Med Univ Silesia, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care & Emergency Med, 3 Go Maja 13-15, Zabrze, Poland
[7] Polish Soc Disaster Med, Swieradowska 43, Warsaw, Poland
[8] Med Univ Bialystok, Dept Emergency Med, Szpitalna 37, Bialystok, Poland
关键词
TRACHEAL INTUBATION; MCGRATH MAC; CPR;
D O I
10.1155/2020/5382739
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction. Airway management plays an essential role in anaesthesia practice, during both elective and urgent surgery procedures and emergency medicine. Aim. The aim of the study was to compare Macintosh laryngoscope (MAC), McGrath, and TruView PCD in 5 separate airway management scenarios. Methods. This prospective cross-over simulation study involved 93 paramedics. All paramedics performed intubation using direct laryngoscope (MAC), McGrath, and TruView PCD video laryngoscopes. The study was performed in 5 different scenarios: (A) normal airway, (B) tongue oedema, (C) pharyngeal obstruction, (D) cervical collar stabilization with tongue oedema, and (E) cervical collar stabilization with pharyngeal obstruction. Results. In scenario A, the success rate was 99% with MAC, 100% with McGrath, and 94% with PCD. Intubation time was 17 s (IQR: 16-21) for MAC, 18 s (IQR: 16-21) for McGrath, and 27 s (IQR: 23-34) for PCD. In scenario B, the success rate was 61% with MAC, 97% with McGrath, and 97% with PCD (p<0.001). Intubation time was 44 s (IQR: 24-46) for MAC, 22 s (IQR: 20-27) for McGrath, and 39 s (IQR: 30-57) for PCD. In scenario C, the success rate with MAC was 74%, 97% with McGrath, and 72% with PCD (p<0.001). Intubation time was 21 s (IQR: 19-29) for MAC, 18 s (IQR: 18-24.5) for McGrath, and 30 s (IQR: 23-39) for PCD. In scenario D, the success rate with MAC was 32%, 69% with McGrath, and 58% with PCD (p<0.001). Intubation time was 26 s (IQR: 20-29) for MAC, 26 s (IQR: 20-29) for McGrath, and 45 s (IQR: 33-56) for PCD. In scenario E, the success rate with MAC was 32%, but 64% with McGrath and 62% with PCD (p<0.001). Intubation time was 28 s (IQR: 25-39) for MAC, 19 s (IQR: 18-26) for McGrath, and 34 s (IQR: 27-45) for PCD. Conclusions. The McGrath video laryngoscope proved better than Truview PCD and direct intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of success rate, duration of first intubation attempt, number of intubation attempts, Cormack-Lehane grade, percentage of glottis opening (POGO score), number of optimization manoeuvres, severity of dental compression, and ease of use.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy and Video Laryngoscopy Methods in Difficult and Easy Airway Models: Manikin Study
    Kavalci, Gulsum
    Ethemoglu, Filiz Banu
    Kumral, Dilber
    Gumus, Irem
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 112 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [22] VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY IMPROVES INTUBATION TIMES WITH LEVEL C PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN NOVICE PHYSICIANS: A RANDOMIZED CROSS-OVER MANIKIN STUDY
    Pantazopoulos, Ioannis
    Kolonia, Konstantina
    Laou, Eleni
    Mermiri, Maria
    Tsolaki, Vasiliki
    Koutsovasilis, Anastasios
    Zakynthinos, Georgios
    Gourgoulianis, Konstantinos
    Arnaoutoglou, Eleni
    Chalkias, Athanasios
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 60 (06): : 764 - 771
  • [23] Glidescope® videolaryngoscope improves intubation success rate in cardiac arrest scenarios without chest compressions interruption: A randomized cross-over manikin study
    Xanthos, Theodoros
    Stroumpoulis, Konstantinos
    Bassiakou, Eleni
    Koudouna, Eleni
    Pantazopoulos, Ioannis
    Mazarakis, Antonios
    Demestiha, Theano
    Iacovidou, Nicoletta
    RESUSCITATION, 2011, 82 (04) : 464 - 467
  • [24] The effect of music on discomfort experienced by intensive care unit patients during turning: A randomized cross-over study
    Cooke, Marie
    Chaboyer, Wendy
    Schluter, Philip
    Foster, Michelle
    Harris, Denise
    Teakle, Roz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (02) : 125 - 131
  • [25] Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study
    Park, Jin-Woo
    An, Sungmin
    Park, Seongjoo
    Nahm, Francis Sahngun
    Han, Sung-Hee
    Kim, Jin-Hee
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [26] Comparison of the Macintosh, McCoy, Airtraq laryngoscopes and the intubating laryngeal mask airway in a difficult airway with manual in-line stabilisation A cross-over simulation-based study
    Sherren, Peter B.
    Kong, Ming-Li
    Chang, Serene
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 30 (09) : 544 - 549
  • [27] Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study
    Maruyama, K.
    Yamada, T.
    Kawakami, R.
    Hara, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 101 (04) : 563 - 567
  • [28] Comparison of dental force applied during endotracheal intubation with hyper-angulated and macintosh-type video laryngoscopy blades used by emergency medicine trainees: A randomized cross-over manikin study
    Karabacak, Ali Riza
    Ozturan, Ibrahim Ulas
    Sefoglu, Omer Faruk
    Dogan, Nurettin Ozgur
    Yaka, Elif
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Pekdemir, Murat
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (03): : 151 - +
  • [29] Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand Randomized, crossover manikin trial
    Bielski, Andrzej
    Rivas, Eva
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    Smereka, Jacek
    Puslecki, Mateusz
    Dabrowski, Marek
    Ladny, Jerzy R.
    Frass, Michael
    Robak, Oliver
    Evrin, Togay
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [30] Comparison of the VivaSight single lumen endotracheal tube and the Macintosh laryngoscope for emergency intubation by experienced paramedics in a standardized airway manikin with restricted access: a randomized, crossover trial
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Smereka, Jacek
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    Evrin, Togay
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (05): : 929 - 930