Risk based urban watershed management under conflicting objectives

被引:0
|
作者
Novotny, V [1 ]
Clark, D [1 ]
Griffin, RJ [1 ]
Booth, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Marquette Univ, Inst Urban Environm Risk Management, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
urban flood control; ecological integrity; risk; risk communication; risk perception; willingness to pay; contingent valuation; public opinion surveys; theory of planned behaviour;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological impairment and flooding caused by urbanization can be expressed numerically by calculating the risks throughout the watershed (floodplain) and along the main stems of the streams. The risks can be evaluated in terms of the present and/or future. This article describes the methodologies for ascertaining the risks in the Geographical Information Systems (GIS) environment. The objectives of urban flood controls and ecological preservation/restoration of urban waters are often conflicting and, in the past, the sole emphasis on flood control led to destruction of habitat and deterioration of water quality. An optimal solution to these two problems may be achieved by linking the risks to the concepts of risk communication, risk perception, and public willingness to pay for projects leading to ecological restoration and ecologically sustainable flood control. This method is appropriate because. in each case. public funds are used and the projects require approval and backing of policy makers and stakeholders. This article briefly describes a research project that attempts to resolve the conflict between the flood protection and stream ecological preservation and restoration and suggests alternative ways of expressing benefits of urban stream flood control and restoration projects.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 78
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A distributed economic MPC framework for cooperative control under conflicting objectives
    Koehler, Philipp N.
    Mueller, Matthias A.
    Allgoewer, Frank
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2018, 96 : 368 - 379
  • [22] AN EXPERIMENTAL-METHOD FOR DIVERSIFIED EVALUATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT WITH CONFLICTING OBJECTIVES
    SEO, F
    SAKAWA, M
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1984, 14 (02): : 213 - 223
  • [23] Economic water management decisions: trade-offs between conflicting objectives in the sub-middle region of the São Francisco watershed
    Gerald Norbert Souza da Silva
    Márcia Maria Guedes Alcoforado de Moraes
    [J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2018, 18 : 1957 - 1967
  • [24] Next generation of watershed management programmes: Objectives and expected results
    Achouri, M.
    [J]. Environmental Role of Wetlands in Headwaters, 2006, 63 : 301 - 312
  • [25] Integrated modeling for watershed management: Multiple objectives and spatial effects
    Newbold, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2002, 38 (02): : 341 - 353
  • [26] Semantics-based transaction processing: Satisfying conflicting objectives
    Ammann, P
    Jajodia, S
    [J]. IEEE CONCURRENCY, 1997, 5 (02): : 8 - 10
  • [27] OPTIMAL ECONOMIC-STABILIZATION POLICIES UNDER DECENTRALIZED CONTROL AND CONFLICTING OBJECTIVES
    PINDYCK, RS
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1977, 22 (04) : 517 - 530
  • [28] Watershed-based region merging using conflicting regions
    Eom, S
    Chang, SC
    Ahn, B
    [J]. 2002 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 781 - 784
  • [29] Resolving conflicting objectives in the management of the Plastiras Lake: can we quantify beauty?
    Christofides, A
    Efstratiadis, A
    Koutsoyiannis, D
    Sargentis, GF
    Hadjibiros, K
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (05) : 507 - 515
  • [30] Management procedures in a fishery based on highly variable stocks and with conflicting objectives: experiences in the South African pelagic fishery
    Kevern L Cochrane
    Doug S. Butterworth
    José A.A. De Oliveira
    Beatriz A. Roel
    [J]. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 1998, 8 : 177 - 214