Benchmark Performance Metrics for Integrated Project Delivery

被引:72
|
作者
Hanna, Awad S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Construct Engn & Management Program, 2320 Engn Hall,1415 Engn Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
Integrated project delivery; Performance metric; Quantitative methods; DESIGN-BUILD;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001151
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction industry is fraught with waste and inefficiencies resulting in projects often failing to meet owners' expectations. Integrated project delivery (IPD) is the newest project delivery system (PDS) and changes the traditional roles and relationships of key project stakeholders. Through increased early collaboration, IPD attempts to eliminate waste and deliver the highest-value projects to owners. It is seen as a potential solution to many of the challenges impeding successful project performance. However, a transformational move toward IPD has yet to reach a tipping point, and its use is not prevalent throughout the construction industry. Little research has been done to quantitatively analyze IPD compared with the more commonly used delivery methods. Through substantial collection of quantitative project performance data and univariate statistical analysis, this study fills the gap in PDS research by evaluating the effects of IPD on building construction projects across a wide range of performance metrics from the perspective of general contractors and construction managers. This research demonstrates that IPD/near-IPD outperformed non-IPD projects with respect to performance in communication, change management, and business performance areas. Communication was found superior in terms of the number of requests for information (RFIs) per million dollars; change management in terms of change-order processing time; and business performance in terms of a project's impact on company image and the potential for return business. A new term called project quarterback rating (PQR), which combines key performance metrics, was used to quantitatively evaluate overall performance. Statistically significant evidence of the overall superior performance of IPD/near-IPD compared with non-IPD projects was found. These results should encourage owners to consider the use of IPD, or IPD principles in conjunction with other delivery methods, in future capital facilities endeavors.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adoption of Integrated Project Delivery Practices for Superior Project Performance
    Ling, Florence Y. Y.
    Teo, Pei Xin
    Li, Shan
    Zhang, Zhe
    Ma, Qiuwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [2] Project Delivery Metrics for Sustainable, High-Performance Buildings
    Swarup, Lipika
    Korkmaz, Sinem
    Riley, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2011, 137 (12): : 1043 - 1051
  • [3] Transforming project delivery: integrated project delivery
    Ashcraft, Howard
    [J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2022, 38 (02) : 369 - 384
  • [4] Dynamic optimization of project delivery using integrated macro-micro resource metrics
    Nott, Dale
    [J]. Proceedings of 20th IPMA World Congress on Project Management, Vols 1 and 2, 2006, : 606 - 609
  • [5] Quantifying Performance for the Integrated Project Delivery System as Compared to Established Delivery Systems
    El Asmar, Mounir
    Hanna, Awad S.
    Loh, Wei-Yin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (11)
  • [6] Piloting Evaluation Metrics for Sustainable High-Performance Building Project Delivery
    Korkmaz, Sinem
    Riley, David
    Horman, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2010, 136 (08): : 877 - 885
  • [7] Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects
    Mesa, Harrison A.
    Molenaar, Keith R.
    Alarcon, Luis F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (07) : 1089 - 1101
  • [8] Influence of Integrated Project Delivery Principles on Project Performance in China: An SEM-Based Approach
    Mei, Tingting
    Guo, Zeng
    Li, Peng
    Fang, Kaixian
    Zhong, Shuda
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [9] Comparative analysis between integrated project delivery and lean project delivery
    Mesa, Harrison A.
    Molenaar, Keith R.
    Alarcon, Luis F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 37 (03) : 395 - 409
  • [10] Integrated Digital Delivery: Implementation status and project performance in the Singapore construction industry
    Hwang, Bon-Gang
    Ngo, Jasmine
    Her, Priscilla Wan Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 262