Comparative analysis between integrated project delivery and lean project delivery

被引:65
|
作者
Mesa, Harrison A. [1 ]
Molenaar, Keith R. [2 ,5 ]
Alarcon, Luis F. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Escuela Construcc Civil, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Construct Engn & Management, Santiago, Chile
[4] Av Vicuna Mackenna 4860 Macul, Santiago, Chile
[5] Box 428, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Integrated project delivery; Lean project delivery; Project organization; Contractual relationship; Operational system; BUSINESS MODELS; CONSTRUCTION; INNOVATION; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.012
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Lean Project Delivery (LPD) are innovative approaches that are capturing the attention of the construction industry. However, there is a confusion about the definitions of these approaches and how they integrate a project delivery process. This confusion negatively affects the learning process, which could create a barrier to advancing them. Based on a structured literature review and two case illustrations, this study aims to clarify the similarities and differences between IPD and LPD. This paper presents a comparative analysis of these approaches through a structured analysis of the project organizations, contractual relationships, and operational systems. The results showed that the operational system is perhaps the most relevant difference between these approaches for their definition as a project delivery system. The core of both approaches is to encourage the use of integrated project organizations, relational contracting, and integrated process as mechanisms to integrate a project delivery system. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 409
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transforming project delivery: integrated project delivery
    Ashcraft, Howard
    [J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2022, 38 (02) : 369 - 384
  • [2] Modern Construction: Lean Project Delivery and Integrated Practices
    Sacks, Rafael
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (04) : 394 - +
  • [3] Lean and Flexible Project Delivery
    Vaagen, Hajnalka
    Ballard, Glenn
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (19):
  • [4] Comparative Analysis between Project Delivery Systems through Quantitative Assessment of Project Performance
    Ibrahim, Michael
    Hanna, Awad
    Kievet, Dave
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2018: CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 670 - 680
  • [5] Lean processes for sustainable project delivery
    Lapinski, Anthony R.
    Horman, Michael J.
    Riley, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2006, 132 (10): : 1083 - 1091
  • [6] Lean Integrated Project Delivery for Construction Procurement: The Case of Sri Lanka
    Hettiaarachchige, Nadeesha
    Rathnasinghe, Akila
    Ranadewa, K. A. T. O.
    Thurairajah, Niraj
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (05)
  • [7] An integrated Building Information Modelling, Integrated Project Delivery and Lean Construction Maturity Model
    Rashidian, Sara
    Drogemuller, Robin
    Omrani, Sara
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [8] A Value Analysis of Lean Processes in Target Value Design and Integrated Project Delivery: Stakeholder Perception
    Nanda, Upali
    Rybkowski, Zofia K.
    Pati, Sipra
    Nejati, Adeleh
    [J]. HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL, 2017, 10 (03) : 99 - 115
  • [9] Synergistic Effect of Integrated Project Delivery, Lean Construction, and Building Information Modeling on Project Performance Measures: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
    Phuong Nguyen
    Akhavian, Reza
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [10] THE COMPATIBILITY OF EXISTING BIM MATURITY MODELS WITH LEAN CONSTRUCTION AND INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY
    Rashidian, Sara
    Drogemuller, Robin
    Omrani, Sara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 27 : 496 - 511