Comparative analysis between integrated project delivery and lean project delivery

被引:66
|
作者
Mesa, Harrison A. [1 ]
Molenaar, Keith R. [2 ,5 ]
Alarcon, Luis F. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Escuela Construcc Civil, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Construct Engn & Management, Santiago, Chile
[4] Av Vicuna Mackenna 4860 Macul, Santiago, Chile
[5] Box 428, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Integrated project delivery; Lean project delivery; Project organization; Contractual relationship; Operational system; BUSINESS MODELS; CONSTRUCTION; INNOVATION; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.012
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Lean Project Delivery (LPD) are innovative approaches that are capturing the attention of the construction industry. However, there is a confusion about the definitions of these approaches and how they integrate a project delivery process. This confusion negatively affects the learning process, which could create a barrier to advancing them. Based on a structured literature review and two case illustrations, this study aims to clarify the similarities and differences between IPD and LPD. This paper presents a comparative analysis of these approaches through a structured analysis of the project organizations, contractual relationships, and operational systems. The results showed that the operational system is perhaps the most relevant difference between these approaches for their definition as a project delivery system. The core of both approaches is to encourage the use of integrated project organizations, relational contracting, and integrated process as mechanisms to integrate a project delivery system. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 409
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Facing the challenges of integrated design and project delivery
    Hellmund, Amy J.
    Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G.
    Baker, Kenneth
    Energy Engineering: Journal of the Association of Energy Engineering, 2008, 105 (06): : 36 - 47
  • [32] Early Stages in the Institutionalization of Integrated Project Delivery
    Hall, Daniel M.
    Scott, W. Richard
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 50 (02) : 128 - 143
  • [33] A dedicated collaboration platform for Integrated Project Delivery
    Ma, Zhiliang
    Zhang, Dongdong
    Li, Jiulin
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 86 : 199 - 209
  • [34] Integrated Project Delivery Method to Sustainable Construction
    Chen, Zixiang
    Liu, Ping
    Yang, Yunhui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT, INFORMATION AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (EMIM 2017), 2017, 76 : 777 - 781
  • [35] A research and development framework for integrated project delivery
    Arar, Ahmad J.
    Poirier, Erik
    Staub-French, Sheryl
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2025, 43 (02) : 85 - 112
  • [36] Implications of the Integrated Project Delivery Research in Practice
    Gomez, Sulyn
    Naderpajouh, Nader
    Ballard, Glenn
    Hastak, Makarand
    Weidner, Theodore J.
    Barriga, Paulo
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2018: SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION AND EDUCATION, 2018, : 86 - 96
  • [37] Facing the challenges of integrated design and project delivery
    Architecture H2A, Boise, ID, United States
    不详
    不详
    Strategic Plann Energy Environ, 2008, 1 (69-80): : 69 - 80
  • [38] An Integration of BIM and GIS for Integrated Project Delivery
    Gao, Zhili
    Ezekwem, Kenechukwu
    Aslam, Mughees
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2020: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROLS, MATERIALS, AND CONTRACTS, 2020, : 505 - 514
  • [39] Barriers to adopting integrated project delivery practices
    Ma, Qiuwen
    Li, Shan
    Teo, Pei Xin
    Ling, Florence Yean Yng
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 30 (09) : 4171 - 4191
  • [40] Benchmark Performance Metrics for Integrated Project Delivery
    Hanna, Awad S.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 142 (09)