Best criteria selection based PROMETHEE II method

被引:30
|
作者
Singh, Anjali [1 ,2 ]
Gupta, Anjana [2 ]
Mehra, Aparna [3 ]
机构
[1] JNTU, Mahatma Gandhi Inst Technol, Dept Math & Humanities, Hyderabad 500075, Telangana, India
[2] Delhi Technol Univ, Dept Appl Math, Delhi 110042, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Math, Delhi 110016, India
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; PROMETHEE II; TOPSIS; Stability degree; Conformity metric; Kendall's tau-b rank correlation coefficient; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; ENERGY; TOPSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s12597-020-00464-7
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In recent years, PROMETHEE II has emerged as one of the most efficient and successfully applied outranking method in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems. Conventional PROMETHEE II method presumes that the weights of the criteria are known beforehand, and this is rather a stringent assumption. Moreover, the number of preference indices to be evaluated in the method grows enormously with an increase in the number of alternatives to be ranked. In this work, we look at these concerns and propose a methodology inspired by PROMETHEE II that identifies the best criteria first and then, the preference indices are computed with respect to these criteria only. The algorithm is customized in such a way that it curtails the computational time complexity of PROMETHEE II to a great extent. Here, a large number of alternatives-criteria evaluation matrices are simulated with random numeric data to illustrate the proposed method and evaluate its performance. Statistical analysis on the stability of the rankings and the conformity measure proves that the proposed approach may be preferred over PROMETHEE II and TOPSIS methods. Rank correlation coefficients are evaluated, and they indicate the efficacy of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 180
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comprehensive study on the selection and performance of the best electrode pair for electrocoagulation of textile wastewater using multi-criteria decision-making methods (TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE II)
    Ahmed, Tahmeed
    Ahsan, Amimul
    Khan, Md. Habibur Rahman Bejoy
    Nahian, Tamzid Kamal
    Antar, Rafiul Hasan
    Hasan, Alvy
    Karim, Md. Rezaul
    Shafiquzzaman, Md.
    Imteaz, Monzur
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 363
  • [32] Determining Multi-Criteria Decisions For The Selection Of Discounted Products In Sales Promotion Activities Through Promethee Method
    Cicekli, Ural Gokay
    Ventura, Keti
    Bilgehan, Hande
    EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW, 2018, 18 (04) : 727 - 739
  • [33] Multiple suppliers selection using the PROMETHEE V method
    Zapletal, Frantisek
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS (MME 2017), 2017, : 854 - 859
  • [34] Underground Mining Method Selection Using WPM and PROMETHEE
    Balusa B.C.
    Singam J.
    Balusa, Bhanu Chander (bhanuchanderbalusa@gmail.com), 2018, Springer (99) : 165 - 171
  • [35] MODIFIED PROMETHEE V METHOD FOR SUPPLIER PORTFOLIO SELECTION
    Zapletal, Frantisek
    Trumic, Rijad
    Lenort, Radim
    ACTA LOGISTICA, 2022, 9 (03): : 291 - 301
  • [36] Location selection for logistics centre using PROMETHEE method
    Fabry, Jan
    Zapletal, Frantisek
    Machacova, Tereza
    ACTA LOGISTICA, 2024, 11 (03): : 409 - 419
  • [37] SELECTION OF FOOD WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTION BY PROMETHEE METHOD
    Erceg, Olgica
    Margeta, Jure
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING OSIJEK-E-GFOS, 2019, 19 : 87 - 97
  • [38] A PROMETHEE II Method Based on Regret Theory Under the Probabilistic Linguistic Environment
    Jia, Xiang
    Wang, Xinfan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 228255 - 228263
  • [39] Towards a Students Admission Selection Approach Using PROMETHEE II
    FungYuen, Kevin Kam
    Haur, Lee Yew
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING, ASSESSMENT, AND LEARNING FOR ENGINEERING (TALE), 2018, : 696 - 699
  • [40] Concept selection with hesitant fuzzy ANP-PROMETHEE II
    Samanlioglu, Funda
    Ayag, Zeki
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2021, 38 (07) : 547 - 560