Repeatability Investigation of Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Thyroid Glands

被引:8
|
作者
Lu, Yonggang [1 ]
Hatzoglou, Vaios [2 ]
Banerjee, Suchandrima [3 ]
Stambuk, Hilda E. [2 ]
Gonen, Mithat [4 ]
Shankaranarayanan, Ajit [3 ]
Mazaheri, Yousef [1 ,2 ]
Deasy, Joseph O. [1 ]
Shaha, Ashok R. [5 ]
Tuttle, R. Michael [6 ]
Shukla-Dave, Amita [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] GE Healthcare, Global Appl Sci Lab, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10065 USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY 10065 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging; repeatability; thyroid glands; SPINAL-CORD; DIFFERENTIATE BENIGN; TREATMENT RESPONSE; BREAST-CANCER; NODULES; COEFFICIENT; MRI; UTILITY; HEAD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the repeatability of the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metric (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) derived from reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted (rFOV DWI) on thyroid glands in a clinical setting. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy human volunteers were enrolled in MRI studies performed on a 3-T MRI scanner. Each volunteer was designed to undergo 3 longitudinal examinations (2 weeks apart) with 2 repetitive sessions within each examination, which included rFOV and conventional full field-of-view (fFOV) DWI scans. Diffusion-weighted images were assessed and scored based on image characteristics. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of thyroid glands from all participants were calculated based on regions of interest. Repeatability analysis was performed based on the framework proposed by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance, generating 4 repeatability metrics: within-participant variance (sigma(2)(w)), repeatability coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficient, and within-participant coefficient of variation. Student t test was used to compare the performance difference between rFOV and fFOV DWI. Results: The overall image quality from rFOV DWI was significantly higher than that from fFOV DWI (P = 0.04). The ADC values calculated from rFOV DWI were significantly lower than corresponding values from fFOV DWI (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in ADC values across sessions and examinations in either rFOV or fFOV DWI (P > 0.05). Reduced field-of-view DWI had lower values of sigma(2)(w), repeatability coefficient, and within-participant coefficient of variation and had a higher value of intraclass correlation coefficient compared with fFOV DWI across either sessions or examinations. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that rFOV DWI produced more superior-quality DWI images and more repeatable ADC measurements compared with fFOV DWI, thus providing a feasible quantitative imaging tool for investigating thyroid glands in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 339
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reduced field-of-view versus full field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging for the evaluation of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
    Jang, Siwon
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Bae, Jae Seok
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (04) : 1468 - 1477
  • [32] Impact on the image quality of modified reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using spatially tailored two-dimensional radiofrequency pulses with a tilted excitation plane: A comparison with conventional field-of-view imaging
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Hideura, Keiko
    Higashi, Mayumi
    Ihara, Kenichiro
    Inoue, Atsuo
    Narikiyo, Koji
    Benkert, Thomas
    Imai, Hiroshi
    Yamane, Masatoshi
    Yamaguchi, Takahiro
    Shimokawa, Mototsugu
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 168
  • [33] Detection of inflammation in abdominal aortic aneurysm with reduced field-of-view and low-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging
    Pan, Yi-Jun
    Jiang, Xiao-lang
    Shan, Yan
    Xu, Peng-Ju
    Dong, Zhi-hui
    Lin, Jiang
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2025, 117
  • [34] Reduced Field of View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Congenital Spine Malformations
    Radhakrishnan, Rupa
    Betts, Aaron M.
    Care, Marguerite M.
    Serai, Suraj
    Zhang, Bin
    Jones, Blaise V.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2016, 26 (03) : 273 - 277
  • [35] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in an Ultra-Low Magnetic Field
    Ievleva, S. V.
    Luzhetckaia, N. V.
    Tyutyukin, K. V.
    Frolov, V. V.
    APPLIED MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2017, 48 (07) : 699 - 706
  • [36] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in an Ultra-Low Magnetic Field
    S. V. Ievleva
    N. V. Luzhetckaia
    K. V. Tyutyukin
    V. V. Frolov
    Applied Magnetic Resonance, 2017, 48 : 699 - 706
  • [37] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lung lesions: repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient measurement
    L. Bernardin
    N. H. M. Douglas
    D. J. Collins
    S. L. Giles
    E. A. M. O’Flynn
    M. Orton
    N. M. deSouza
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 502 - 511
  • [38] Comparison of Navigator Triggering Reduced Field of View and Large Field of View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Pancreas
    Mannelli, Lorenzo
    Monti, Serena
    Corrias, Giuseppe
    Fung, Maggie M.
    Nyman, Charles
    Pernicka, Jennifer S. Golia
    Do, Richard K. G.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (01) : 143 - 148
  • [39] Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Brandao, Alice C.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (02) : 321 - +
  • [40] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lung lesions: repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient measurement
    Bernardin, L.
    Douglas, N. H. M.
    Collins, D. J.
    Giles, S. L.
    O'Flynn, E. A. M.
    Orton, M.
    deSouza, N. M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) : 502 - 511