Pain relief from nonpharmacological interventions in the intensive care unit: A scoping review

被引:17
|
作者
Sandvik, Reidun K. [1 ,2 ]
Olsen, Brita F. [3 ,4 ]
Rygh, Lars-Jorgen [5 ]
Moi, Asgjerd Litlere [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Ctr Elderly & Nursing Home Med, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
[3] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Intens & Postoperat Unit, Sarpsborg, Norway
[4] Ostfold Univ Coll, Fac Hlth & Welf, Fredrikstad, Norway
[5] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Bergen, Norway
[6] Haukeland Hosp, Natl Burn Ctr, Dept Plast Hand & Reconstruct Surg, Bergen, Norway
关键词
intensive care unit; nonpharmacological treatment; pain; pain management; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; ADULT PATIENTS; TASK-FORCE; MANAGEMENT; SEDATION; NURSES; DELIRIUM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.15194
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and Objectives To describe what is known from the existing literature on nonpharmacological interventions targeting pain in patients admitted to the ICU. Background Patients receiving intensive care nursing are exposed to a wide range of pain provoking tissue damage, diseases, surgery and other medical procedures in addition to the pain caused by nursing care procedures. The present shift to light sedation to improve patient outcomes and comfort underscores the need for effective pain management. Opioids are the mainstay for treating pain in the ICUs, whereas nonpharmacological treatments are understudied and possibly under-used. Method A scoping review was undertaken using five of the six steps in the Arksey and O ' Malley framework: (a) identification of the research question, (b) identification of relevant studies, (c) study selection, (d) charting the data and (e) collating, summarising and reporting the results. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, BMJ Best Practice, British Nursing Index and AMED databases were searched using relevant keywords to capture extensive evidence. Data were analysed using the six-step criteria for scoping reviews suggested by Arksey and O ' Malley for data extraction. To ensure quality and transparency, we enclosed the relevant Equator checklist PRISMA. Results Our search yielded 10,985 articles of which 12 studies were included. Tools for pain assessments were VAS, NRS, ESAS and BPS. Interventions explored were hypnosis, simple massage, distraction, relaxation, spiritual care, harp music, music therapy, listening to natural sounds, passive exercise, acupuncture, ice packs and emotional support. Reduction in pain intensity was conferred for hypnosis, acupuncture and natural sounds. Conclusion The findings support further investigations of acupuncture, hypnosis and listening to natural sounds. Relevance to Clinical Practice The main finding suggests the use of comprehensive multimodal interventions to investigate the effects of nonpharmacological treatment protocols on pain intensity, pain proportion and the impact on opioid consumption and sedation requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:1488 / 1498
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effectiveness of cognitive interventions on cognitive outcomes of adult intensive care unit survivors: A scoping review*
    Muradov, Olga
    Petrovskaya, Olga
    Papathanassoglou, Elizabeth
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 34 (05) : 473 - 485
  • [22] Implementation of nonpharmacologic physical restraint minimization interventions in the adult intensive care unit: A scoping review
    Alostaz, Ziad
    Rose, Louise
    Mehta, Sangeeta
    Johnston, Linda
    Dale, Craig
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2022, 69
  • [23] Thrombocytopenia in intensive care unit patients: A scoping review
    Jonsson, Andreas Bender
    Rygard, Sofie Louise
    Hildebrandt, Thomas
    Perner, Anders
    Moller, Morten Hylander
    Russell, Lene
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 65 (01) : 2 - 14
  • [24] Physiotherapy in the neurotrauma intensive care unit: A scoping review
    Newman, Anastasia N. L.
    Gravesande, Janelle
    Rotella, Stephanie
    Wu, Stephen S.
    Topp-Nguyen, Nam
    Kho, Michelle E.
    Harris, Jocelyn E.
    Fox-Robichaud, Alison
    Solomon, Patricia
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 48 : 390 - 406
  • [25] Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review
    Soares, James
    Leung, Catherine
    Campbell, Victoria
    van der Vegt, Anton
    Malycha, James
    Andersen, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF THE INTENSIVE CARE SOCIETY, 2024, 25 (03) : 296 - 307
  • [26] The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review
    Ethan J. Erikson
    Daniel A. Edelman
    Fiona M. Brewster
    Stuart D. Marshall
    Maryann C. Turner
    Vineet V. Sarode
    David J. Brewster
    Critical Care, 27
  • [27] The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review
    Erikson, Ethan J.
    Edelman, Daniel A.
    Brewster, Fiona M.
    Marshall, Stuart D.
    Turner, Maryann C.
    Sarode, Vineet V.
    Brewster, David J.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [28] Management of tracheostomies in the intensive care unit: a scoping review
    Whitmore, Kirsty A.
    Townsend, Shane C.
    Laupland, Kevin B.
    BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [29] Cochrane Review Summary A summary of findings from the Cochrane Library with implications for critical care nursing Nonpharmacological Interventions for Sleep Promotion in the Intensive Care Unit
    Sandoval, Cass Piper
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2017, 37 (02) : 100 - 102
  • [30] Nonpharmacological interventions in dementia and diversity of samples: A scoping review
    Roche, L.
    Longacre, M. L.
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2024, 55 : 311 - 326