The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review

被引:3
|
作者
Erikson, Ethan J. [1 ]
Edelman, Daniel A. [2 ]
Brewster, Fiona M. [3 ]
Marshall, Stuart D. [4 ,5 ]
Turner, Maryann C. [4 ,6 ]
Sarode, Vineet V. [1 ,7 ]
Brewster, David J. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Cabrini Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Alfred Hlth, Dept Crit Care, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Royal Womens Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Melbourne, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Crit Care, Melbourne, Australia
[5] Peninsula Hlth, Dept Anaesthesia, Melbourne, Australia
[6] Royal Childrens Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Melbourne, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Australia
关键词
Checklist; Intensive care; Scoping review; Rounding; Delirium screening; Handover; Infection prevention; Airway management; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; SAFETY CHECKLISTS; OPERATING-ROOM; COMMUNICATION; INTERVENTIONS; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-023-04758-2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundDespite the extensive volume of research published on checklists in the intensive care unit (ICU), no review has been published on the broader role of checklists within the intensive care unit, their implementation and validation, and the recommended clinical context for their use. Accordingly, a scoping review was necessary to map the current literature and to guide future research on intensive care checklists. This review focuses on what checklists are currently used, how they are used, process of checklist development and implementation, and outcomes associated with checklist use.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was conducted, followed by a grey literature search. The abstracts of the identified studies were screened. Full texts of relevant articles were reviewed, and the references of included studies were subsequently screened for additional relevant articles. Details of the study characteristics, study design, checklist intervention, and outcomes were extracted.ResultsOur search yielded 2046 studies, of which 167 were selected for further analysis. Checklists identified in these studies were categorised into the following types: rounding checklists; delirium screening checklists; transfer and handover checklists; central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention checklists; airway management checklists; and other. Of 72 significant clinical outcomes reported, 65 were positive, five were negative, and two were mixed. Of 122 significant process of care outcomes reported, 114 were positive and eight were negative.ConclusionsChecklists are commonly used in the intensive care unit and appear in many clinical guidelines. Delirium screening checklists and rounding checklists are well implemented and validated in the literature. Clinical and process of care outcomes associated with checklist use are predominantly positive. Future research on checklists in the intensive care unit should focus on establishing clinical guidelines for checklist types and processes for ongoing modification and improvements using post-intervention data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review
    Ethan J. Erikson
    Daniel A. Edelman
    Fiona M. Brewster
    Stuart D. Marshall
    Maryann C. Turner
    Vineet V. Sarode
    David J. Brewster
    [J]. Critical Care, 27
  • [2] Use of Rounding Checklists to Improve Communication and Collaboration in the Adult Intensive Care Unit: An Integrative Review
    Gunnels, Marshall S.
    Thompson, Susan L.
    Jenifer, Yvette
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2024, 44 (02) : 31 - 40
  • [3] Thrombocytopenia in intensive care unit patients: A scoping review
    Jonsson, Andreas Bender
    Rygard, Sofie Louise
    Hildebrandt, Thomas
    Perner, Anders
    Moller, Morten Hylander
    Russell, Lene
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 65 (01) : 2 - 14
  • [4] Physiotherapy in the neurotrauma intensive care unit: A scoping review
    Newman, Anastasia N. L.
    Gravesande, Janelle
    Rotella, Stephanie
    Wu, Stephen S.
    Topp-Nguyen, Nam
    Kho, Michelle E.
    Harris, Jocelyn E.
    Fox-Robichaud, Alison
    Solomon, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 48 : 390 - 406
  • [5] Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review
    Soares, James
    Leung, Catherine
    Campbell, Victoria
    van der Vegt, Anton
    Malycha, James
    Andersen, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTENSIVE CARE SOCIETY, 2024, 25 (03) : 296 - 307
  • [6] Management of tracheostomies in the intensive care unit: a scoping review
    Whitmore, Kirsty A.
    Townsend, Shane C.
    Laupland, Kevin B.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [7] Transition of care at discharge from the Intensive Care Unit: a scoping review
    Weschenfelder Herve, Michele Elisa
    Zucatti, Paula Buchs
    Da Silva Lima, Maria Alice Dias
    [J]. REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2020, 28
  • [8] The family in preventing delirium in the intensive care unit: Scoping review
    Pabon-Martinez, B. A.
    Rodriguez-Pulido, L. I.
    Henao-Castano, A. M.
    [J]. ENFERMERIA INTENSIVA, 2022, 33 (01): : 33 - 43
  • [9] Nurses' clinical leadership in the intensive care unit: A scoping review
    Iraizoz-Iraizoz, Andrea
    Garcia-Garcia, Raquel
    Navarrete-Muro, Andrea
    Blasco-Zafra, Ana
    Rodriguez-Beperet, Ane
    Vazquez-Calatayud, Monica
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 75
  • [10] Natural language processing in the intensive care unit: A scoping review
    Pilowsky, Julia K.
    Choi, Jae-Won
    Saavedra, Aldo
    Daher, Maysaa
    Nguyen, Nhi
    Williams, Linda
    Jones, Sarah L.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2024, 26 (03) : 210 - 216