Importance of Calibration Method in Central Blood Pressure for Cardiac Structural Abnormalities

被引:44
|
作者
Negishi, Kazuaki [1 ]
Yang, Hong [1 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Nolan, Mark T. [1 ]
Negishi, Tomoko [1 ]
Pathan, Faraz [1 ]
Marwick, Thomas H. [1 ]
Sharman, James E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
blood pressure determinations; blood vessels; cardiovascular diagnostic technique; heart function tests; hypertension; pulse wave analysis; CENTRAL AORTIC PRESSURE; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; ARTERIAL-PRESSURE; TASK-FORCE; MANAGEMENT; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1093/ajh/hpw039
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Central blood pressure (CBP) independently predicts cardiovascular risk, but calibration methods may affect accuracy of central systolic blood pressure (CSBP). Standard central systolic blood pressure (Stan-CSBP) from peripheral waveforms is usually derived with calibration using brachial SBP and diastolic BP (DBP). However, calibration using oscillometric mean arterial pressure (MAP) and DBP (MAP-CSBP) is purported to provide more accurate representation of true invasive CSBP. This study sought to determine which derived CSBP could more accurately discriminate cardiac structural abnormalities. A total of 349 community-based patients with risk factors (71 +/- 5years, 161 males) had CSBP measured by brachial oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph, IEM GmbH, Stolberg, Germany) using 2 calibration methods: MAP-CSBP and Stan-CSBP. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left atrial dilatation (LAD) were measured based on standard guidelines. MAP-CSBP was higher than Stan-CSBP (149 +/- 20 vs. 128 +/- 15mm Hg, P < 0.0001). Although they were modestly correlated (rho = 0.74, P < 0.001), the Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a large bias (21mm Hg) and limits of agreement (24mm Hg). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, MAP-CSBP significantly better discriminated LVH compared with Stan-CSBP (area under the curve (AUC) 0.66 vs. 0.59, P = 0.0063) and brachial SBP (0.62, P = 0.027). Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) (P < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) (P < 0.001) corroborated superior discrimination of LVH by MAP-CSBP. Similarly, MAP-CSBP better distinguished LAD than Stan-CSBP (AUC 0.63 vs. 0.56, P = 0.005) and conventional brachial SBP (0.58, P = 0.006), whereas Stan-CSBP provided no better discrimination than conventional brachial BP (P = 0.09). CSBP is calibration dependent and when oscillometric MAP and DBP are used, the derived CSBP is a better discriminator for cardiac structural abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:1070 / 1076
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of calibration approaches on the accuracy of oscillometric central aortic blood pressure measurement
    Gotzmann, Michael
    Hogeweg, Maximilian
    Bauer, Frederic
    Seibert, Felix S.
    Rohn, Benjamin J.
    Muegge, Andreas
    Babel, Nina
    Westhoff, Timm H.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2020, 38 (11) : 2154 - 2160
  • [32] Relationship between brachial blood pressure obtained by cuff method and central blood pressure measured with invasive method
    Kobayashi, H.
    Kino, M.
    Hokama, Y.
    Ohshima, K.
    Sugo, Y.
    Kojima, I.
    Miyawaki, Y.
    Takazawa, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 265 - 265
  • [33] Omphalocele and Cardiac Abnormalities-The Importance of the Association
    Tarca, Elena
    Al Namat, Dina
    Luca, Alina Costina
    Lupu, Vasile Valeriu
    Al Namat, Razan
    Lupu, Ancuta
    Balanescu, Laura
    Bernic, Jana
    Butnariu, Lacramioara Ionela
    Moscalu, Mihaela
    Hinganu, Marius Valeriu
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (08)
  • [34] The Value of Optimal Blood Pressure Control in Reducing Functional and Structural Cardiovascular Abnormalities
    El Shahawy, Mahfouz
    Entcheva, Miglena
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2011, 17 (08) : S68 - S69
  • [35] Development of an auto calibration method for the mplantable blood pressure sensor in the UPVAD
    Saito, I.
    Shi, W.
    Chinzei, T.
    Isoyama, T.
    Miura, H.
    Kouno, A.
    Ono, T.
    Nakagawa, H.
    Yamaguchi, S.
    Mitsumune, N.
    Inoue, Y.
    Kishi, A.
    Abe, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2007, 30 (08): : 691 - 691
  • [36] Research on Calibration Method of Flexible Blood Pressure Sensor Based on Photoplethysmography
    Shi, Wei
    Dong, Lin-Xi
    Weng, Bin-Hui
    Cheng, Jia-Gen
    Yang, Wei-Huang
    Liu, Chao-Ran
    Tien Tzu Hsueh Pao/Acta Electronica Sinica, 2024, 52 (08): : 2648 - 2658
  • [37] Calibration of noninvasive central blood pressure devices and negative aortic-to-brachial systolic pressure amplification
    Papaioannou, Theodore G.
    Vavuranakis, Manolis
    Tousoulis, Dimitrios
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 91 (01) : 253 - 254
  • [38] The Calibration Method for Blood Pressure Pulse Wave Measurement Based on Arterial Tonometry Method
    Shimura, Koichi
    Hori, Masataka
    Dohi, Tctsuji
    Takao, Hiroyuki
    2018 40TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2018, : 3642 - 3645
  • [39] Central blood pressure, cardiac biomarkers and maternal complications in hypertensive pregnancies
    Mbongozi, X. B.
    Galloway, S. D. R.
    Hunter, A.
    Businge, C. B.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 : 114 - 114
  • [40] Cardiac structure and function in relation to central blood pressure components in Chinese
    Zhang, Yi
    Li, Yan
    Ding, Feng-Hua
    Sheng, Chang-Sheng
    Huang, Qi-Fang
    Wang, Ji-Guang
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 29 (12) : 2462 - 2468