Importance of Calibration Method in Central Blood Pressure for Cardiac Structural Abnormalities

被引:44
|
作者
Negishi, Kazuaki [1 ]
Yang, Hong [1 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Nolan, Mark T. [1 ]
Negishi, Tomoko [1 ]
Pathan, Faraz [1 ]
Marwick, Thomas H. [1 ]
Sharman, James E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
blood pressure determinations; blood vessels; cardiovascular diagnostic technique; heart function tests; hypertension; pulse wave analysis; CENTRAL AORTIC PRESSURE; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; ARTERIAL-PRESSURE; TASK-FORCE; MANAGEMENT; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1093/ajh/hpw039
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Central blood pressure (CBP) independently predicts cardiovascular risk, but calibration methods may affect accuracy of central systolic blood pressure (CSBP). Standard central systolic blood pressure (Stan-CSBP) from peripheral waveforms is usually derived with calibration using brachial SBP and diastolic BP (DBP). However, calibration using oscillometric mean arterial pressure (MAP) and DBP (MAP-CSBP) is purported to provide more accurate representation of true invasive CSBP. This study sought to determine which derived CSBP could more accurately discriminate cardiac structural abnormalities. A total of 349 community-based patients with risk factors (71 +/- 5years, 161 males) had CSBP measured by brachial oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph, IEM GmbH, Stolberg, Germany) using 2 calibration methods: MAP-CSBP and Stan-CSBP. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left atrial dilatation (LAD) were measured based on standard guidelines. MAP-CSBP was higher than Stan-CSBP (149 +/- 20 vs. 128 +/- 15mm Hg, P < 0.0001). Although they were modestly correlated (rho = 0.74, P < 0.001), the Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a large bias (21mm Hg) and limits of agreement (24mm Hg). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, MAP-CSBP significantly better discriminated LVH compared with Stan-CSBP (area under the curve (AUC) 0.66 vs. 0.59, P = 0.0063) and brachial SBP (0.62, P = 0.027). Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) (P < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) (P < 0.001) corroborated superior discrimination of LVH by MAP-CSBP. Similarly, MAP-CSBP better distinguished LAD than Stan-CSBP (AUC 0.63 vs. 0.56, P = 0.005) and conventional brachial SBP (0.58, P = 0.006), whereas Stan-CSBP provided no better discrimination than conventional brachial BP (P = 0.09). CSBP is calibration dependent and when oscillometric MAP and DBP are used, the derived CSBP is a better discriminator for cardiac structural abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:1070 / 1076
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ESTIMATED CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE: IMPORTANCE OF RADIAL ARTERY PRESSURE WAVEFORM CALIBRATION
    Mahieu, Dries
    Rietzschel, Ernst R.
    De Buyzere, Marc L.
    Verbeke, Francis
    Gillebert, Thierry C.
    De Backer, Guy
    De Bacquer, Dirk
    Verdonck, Pascal
    Van Bortel, Luc M.
    Segerss, Patrick
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2009, 64 (02): : 164 - 164
  • [2] 03.05 Estimated Central Blood Pressure: Importance of Radial Artery Pressure Waveform Calibration
    D. Mahieu
    E. R. Rietzschel
    M. L. De Buyzere
    F. Verbeke
    T. C. Gillebert
    G. De Backer
    D. De Bacquer
    P. Verdonck
    L. M. Van Bortel
    P. Segers
    Artery Research, 2008, 2 (3) : 88 - 88
  • [3] The importance of calibration method in determining the association between central blood pressure with left ventricular and left atrial strain
    Ramkumar, Satish
    Yang, Hong
    Nolan, Mark
    Negishi, Tomoko
    Sharman, James E.
    Marwick, Thomas H.
    Negishi, Kazuaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2022, 38 (03): : 589 - 600
  • [4] The importance of calibration method in determining the association between central blood pressure with left ventricular and left atrial strain
    Satish Ramkumar
    Hong Yang
    Mark Nolan
    Tomoko Negishi
    James E. Sharman
    Thomas H. Marwick
    Kazuaki Negishi
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2022, 38 : 589 - 600
  • [5] Oscillometric mean arterial pressure-derived, not systolic pressure-derived, central blood pressure better discriminates cardiac structural abnormalities
    Negishi, K.
    Yang, H.
    Wang, Y.
    Nolan, M.
    Saito, M.
    Negishi, T.
    Sharman, J.
    Marwick, T.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 1016 - 1017
  • [6] Is the calibration method for central blood pressure important in assessing the association between central blood pressure with LV and left atrial strain?
    Ramkumar, S.
    Yang, H.
    Wang, Y.
    Howlett-Jansen, Y.
    Nolan, M.
    Marwick, T. H.
    Negishi, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 1160 - 1160
  • [7] Central Blood Pressure Calibration Method and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction According to Sex
    Lamarche, Florence
    Agharazii, Mohsen
    Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire
    Madore, Francois
    Goupil, Remi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 552 - 553
  • [8] Effect of radial artery calibration method and transfer function on estimated central blood pressure
    Mahieu, D.
    Rietzschel, E.
    Vermeersch, S.
    De Buyzere, M.
    Verbeke, F.
    Gillebert, T.
    Verdonck, P.
    Segers, P.
    Van Bortel, L.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 : S306 - S306
  • [9] Measuring central blood pressure in youth: calibration issues
    Pucci, Giacomo
    D'Abbondanza, Marco
    Schillaci, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 (10) : 2100 - 2102
  • [10] Independent contribution from central blood pressure to left atrial structural and functional abnormalities in hypertensive patients
    Kabaj, M.
    Rojek, A.
    Kosowski, W.
    Przewlocka-Kosmala, M.
    Mysiak, A.
    Sharman, J.
    Kosmala, W.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 256 - 256