Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery

被引:28
|
作者
Lai, Hou-Chuan [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Meei-Shyuan [3 ]
Liu, Yin-Tzu [4 ]
Lin, Kuen-Tze [2 ,5 ]
Hung, Kuo-Chuan [6 ]
Chen, Jen-Yin [6 ,7 ]
Wu, Zhi-Fu [6 ]
机构
[1] Triserv Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Def Med Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Def Med Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Wanfang Hosp, Div Anesthesiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Triserv Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Tainan, Taiwan
[7] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Senior Citizen Serv Management, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 05期
关键词
TUMOR-METASTASIS; ISOFLURANE; MANAGEMENT; VOLATILE; INVASION; OVEREXPRESSION; ADENOCARCINOMA; RECURRENCE; HALOTHANE; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0233598
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Previous researches have shown that anesthetic techniques can influence the patient outcomes of cancer surgery. Here, we studied the relationship between type of anesthetic and patient outcomes following elective, open pancreatic cancer surgery. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received elective, open pancreatic cancer surgery between January 2005 and July 2018. Patients were grouped according to the anesthesia they received, namely desflurane or propofol. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted, and survival curves were presented from the date of surgery to death. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death after propensity matching. Subgroup analyses were performed for all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and disease progression. Results A total of 68 patients (56 deaths, 82.0%) under desflurane anesthesia, and 72 patients (43 deaths, 60.0%) under propofol anesthesia were included. Fifty-eight patients remained in each group after propensity matching. The propofol anesthesia was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.99; P = 0.047) in the matched analysis. Subgroup analyses showed significantly better cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.97; P = 0.037) in the propofol group. Additionally, patients under propofol had less postoperative recurrence, but not fewer postoperative metastases formation, than those under desflurane (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.90; P = 0.028) in the matched analysis. Conclusions In a limited sample size, we observed that propofol anesthesia was associated with improved survival in open pancreatic cancer surgery compared with desflurane anesthesia. Further investigations are needed to inspect the influences of propofol anesthesia on patient outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hemodynamic effects, myocardial ischemia, and timing of tracheal extubation with propofol-based anesthesia for cardiac surgery
    Myles, PS
    Buckland, MR
    Weeks, AM
    Bujor, MA
    McRae, R
    Langley, M
    Moloney, JT
    Hunt, JO
    Davis, BB
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (01): : 12 - 19
  • [42] Sevoflurane is an effective adjuvant to propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for attenuating cough reflex in nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
    Lai, Hou-Chuan
    Huang, Tsai-Wang
    Tseng, Wei-Cheng
    Lin, Wei-Lin
    Chang, Hung
    Wu, Zhi-Fu
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (42)
  • [43] Safety of Monitored Anesthesia Care Using Propofol-Based Sedation for Pleuroscopy
    Vakil, Erik
    Sarkiss, Mona
    Ost, David
    Vial, Macarena R.
    Casal, Roberto F.
    Eapen, Georgie A.
    Grosu, Horiana B.
    RESPIRATION, 2018, 95 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [44] Propofol-Based Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
    Yurtlu, Derya Arslan
    Aslan, Fatih
    Ayvat, Pinar
    Isik, Yasemin
    Karakus, Nesli
    Unsal, Belkis
    Kizilkaya, Mehmet
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (20)
  • [45] Propofol based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane based inhalation anesthesia: The postoperative characteristics in oral and maxillofacial surgery
    Simsek, Hasan Onur
    Kocaturk, Ozlem
    Demetoglu, Umut
    Gursoytrak, Burcu
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 48 (09) : 880 - 884
  • [46] Comparison of surgical conditions during propofol or desflurane anesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery
    Cho, Kwangrae
    Lee, Jin Young
    Park, Sung Kuk
    Cheong, Soon Ho
    Lee, Kun Moo
    Lim, Se Hun
    Lee, Jeong Han
    Kim, Myoung-Hun
    Kim, Hyun-Tae
    Park, Jung-Kyu
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 63 (04) : 302 - 307
  • [47] Recovery after anesthesia with remifentanil combined with propofol, desflurane, or sevoflurane for otorhinolaryngeal surgery
    Loop, T
    Priebe, HJ
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (01): : 123 - 129
  • [48] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3 % desflurane
    Tod B. Sloan
    J. Richard Toleikis
    Sandra C. Toleikis
    Antoun Koht
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2015, 29 : 77 - 85
  • [49] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3 % desflurane
    Sloan, Tod B.
    Toleikis, J. Richard
    Toleikis, Sandra C.
    Koht, Antoun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2015, 29 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [50] Intravenous anesthesia with propofol for painful procedures in children with cancer
    Jayabose, S
    Levendoglu-Tugal, O
    Giamelli, J
    Grodin, W
    Cohn, M
    Sandoval, C
    Ozkaynak, F
    Kubal, K
    Nosetti, M
    Uman, J
    Visintainer, P
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2001, 23 (05) : 290 - 293