Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery

被引:28
|
作者
Lai, Hou-Chuan [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Meei-Shyuan [3 ]
Liu, Yin-Tzu [4 ]
Lin, Kuen-Tze [2 ,5 ]
Hung, Kuo-Chuan [6 ]
Chen, Jen-Yin [6 ,7 ]
Wu, Zhi-Fu [6 ]
机构
[1] Triserv Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Def Med Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Def Med Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Wanfang Hosp, Div Anesthesiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Triserv Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Tainan, Taiwan
[7] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Senior Citizen Serv Management, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 05期
关键词
TUMOR-METASTASIS; ISOFLURANE; MANAGEMENT; VOLATILE; INVASION; OVEREXPRESSION; ADENOCARCINOMA; RECURRENCE; HALOTHANE; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0233598
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Previous researches have shown that anesthetic techniques can influence the patient outcomes of cancer surgery. Here, we studied the relationship between type of anesthetic and patient outcomes following elective, open pancreatic cancer surgery. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received elective, open pancreatic cancer surgery between January 2005 and July 2018. Patients were grouped according to the anesthesia they received, namely desflurane or propofol. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted, and survival curves were presented from the date of surgery to death. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death after propensity matching. Subgroup analyses were performed for all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and disease progression. Results A total of 68 patients (56 deaths, 82.0%) under desflurane anesthesia, and 72 patients (43 deaths, 60.0%) under propofol anesthesia were included. Fifty-eight patients remained in each group after propensity matching. The propofol anesthesia was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.99; P = 0.047) in the matched analysis. Subgroup analyses showed significantly better cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.97; P = 0.037) in the propofol group. Additionally, patients under propofol had less postoperative recurrence, but not fewer postoperative metastases formation, than those under desflurane (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.90; P = 0.028) in the matched analysis. Conclusions In a limited sample size, we observed that propofol anesthesia was associated with improved survival in open pancreatic cancer surgery compared with desflurane anesthesia. Further investigations are needed to inspect the influences of propofol anesthesia on patient outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Faster extubation time with more stable hemodynamics during extubation and shorter total surgical suite time after propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia compared with desflurane anesthesia in lengthy lumbar spine surgery
    Lu, Chueng-He
    Wu, Zhi-Fu
    Lin, Bo-Feng
    Lee, Meei-Shyuan
    Lin, Chin
    Huang, Yuan-Shiou
    Huang, Yi-Hsuan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (02) : 268 - 274
  • [32] Remimazolam-based anesthesia with flumazenil allows faster emergence than propofol-based anesthesia in older patients undergoing spinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Toyota, Yukari
    Kondo, Takashi
    Oshita, Kyoko
    Haraki, Toshiaki
    Narasaki, Soshi
    Kido, Kenshiro
    Kamiya, Satoshi
    Nakamura, Ryuji
    Saeki, Noboru
    Horikawa, Yousuke T.
    Tsutsumi, Yasuo M.
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (46) : E36081
  • [33] PROPOFOL-BASED ANESTHESIA AS COMPARED WITH STANDARD ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES FOR MIDDLE-EAR SURGERY
    JELLISH, WS
    LEONETTI, JP
    MURDOCH, JR
    FOWLES, S
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (04) : 292 - 296
  • [34] Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
    Miao, Lingju
    Lv, Xiang
    Huang, Can
    Li, Ping
    Sun, Yu
    Jiang, Hong
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [35] PROPOFOL-BASED ANESTHESIA AS COMPARED WITH STANDARD ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES FOR MIDDLE-EAR SURGERY
    JELLISH, WS
    LEONETTI, JP
    MURDOCH, JR
    FOWLES, S
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1995, 112 (02) : 262 - 267
  • [36] Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on recurrence and overall survival in patients after modified radical mastectomy: a retrospective study
    Lee, Ji Heui
    Kang, Seok Hee
    Kim, Yunkwang
    Kim, Hyun Ah
    Kim, Bong Seog
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 69 (02) : 126 - 132
  • [37] A COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND DESFLURANE ANESTHESIA FOR MINOR GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY
    GRAHAM, SG
    AITKENHEAD, AR
    ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (06) : 471 - 475
  • [38] Recovery following general anesthesia with desflurane in a low-flow system vs. a propofol-based technique in outpatients
    Hausmann, D
    Mesletzky, P
    Lackmann, K
    Mathers, FG
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (02):
  • [39] Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries
    Zhang, Ying
    Wang, Fang
    Zhang, Hui
    Wei, Yulong
    Deng, Yanan
    Wang, Dezhi
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (29) : E29169
  • [40] General anesthesia occurs frequently in elderly patients during propofol-based sedation and spinal anesthesia
    Sieber, Frederick E.
    Gottshalk, Allan
    Zakriya, Khwaja J.
    Mears, Simon C.
    Lee, Hochang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2010, 22 (03) : 179 - 183