Further tests of dual-process theory: A reply to Yonelinas (1999)

被引:15
|
作者
Glanzer, M
Hilford, A
Kim, K
Adams, JK
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Iona Coll, Dept Psychol, New Rochelle, NY 10801 USA
[3] Montclair State Univ, Dept Psychol, Upper Montclair, NJ 07043 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.522
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a preceding article (M. Glanzer, K. Kim, A. Hilford, & J. K. Adams, 1999), the authors reported the results of testing two predictions of dual-process theory concerning the shape of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC). The theory predicts that item recognition ROCs in standard score form, z-ROCs, will, in general, be concave. It also predicts the degree of concavity that will be present. The two predictions were tested. The theory failed on both. They were tested again in this article: the first prediction with an extended set of data, the second with a new set of predicted concavity measures. The first test found again that contrary to the theory, z-ROCs were not, in general, concave. The second test found again that dual-process theory failed to predict the degree of concavity of specific z-ROCs.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 523
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The dual-process perspective in interdisciplinary action theory: status and perspectives
    Tutic, Andreas
    SOZIALE WELT-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 2022, 73 (02): : 203 - 238
  • [32] Is Splintering Dual-Process Theories a Good Strategy for Theory Development?
    Keller, Victor N.
    Harder, Jenna A.
    Cesario, Joseph
    PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2018, 29 (01) : 20 - 21
  • [33] The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory
    Sowden, Paul T.
    Pringle, Andrew
    Gabora, Liane
    THINKING & REASONING, 2015, 21 (01) : 40 - 60
  • [34] Smooth coping: an embodied, Heideggerian approach to dual-process theory
    Neemeh, Zachariah A.
    ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR, 2022, 30 (04) : 329 - 344
  • [35] Chronometric evidence for the dual-process mental model theory of conditional
    Vergauwe, Evie
    Gauffroy, Caroline
    Morsanyi, Kinga
    Dagry, Isabelle
    Barrouillet, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 25 (02) : 174 - 182
  • [36] The dual-process turn: How recent defenses of dual-process theories of reasoning fail
    Mugg, Joshua
    PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 29 (02) : 300 - 309
  • [37] Dual-process model of courage
    Chowkase, Aakash A.
    Parra-Martinez, Fabio Andres
    Ghahremani, Mehdi
    Bernstein, Zoe
    Finora, Gabrielle
    Sternberg, Robert J.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [38] The Mythical Dual-Process Typology
    Pennycook, Gordon
    De Neys, Wim
    Evans, Jonathan St. B. T.
    Stanovich, Keith E.
    Thompson, Valerie A.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (08) : 667 - 668
  • [39] A Dual-Process Diffusion Model
    Alos-Ferrer, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2018, 31 (02) : 203 - 218
  • [40] Dual-Process Theory and Two Types of Metacognitive Monitoring and Control Processes
    Nadurak, Vitaliy
    INTEGRATIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2023, 57 (04) : 1273 - 1283