Further tests of dual-process theory: A reply to Yonelinas (1999)

被引:15
|
作者
Glanzer, M
Hilford, A
Kim, K
Adams, JK
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Iona Coll, Dept Psychol, New Rochelle, NY 10801 USA
[3] Montclair State Univ, Dept Psychol, Upper Montclair, NJ 07043 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.522
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a preceding article (M. Glanzer, K. Kim, A. Hilford, & J. K. Adams, 1999), the authors reported the results of testing two predictions of dual-process theory concerning the shape of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC). The theory predicts that item recognition ROCs in standard score form, z-ROCs, will, in general, be concave. It also predicts the degree of concavity that will be present. The two predictions were tested. The theory failed on both. They were tested again in this article: the first prediction with an extended set of data, the second with a new set of predicted concavity measures. The first test found again that contrary to the theory, z-ROCs were not, in general, concave. The second test found again that dual-process theory failed to predict the degree of concavity of specific z-ROCs.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 523
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条