Comparison of Clustering Methods for Obesity Classification

被引:0
|
作者
Ahn, S. H. [1 ]
Wang, C. [1 ]
Shin, G. W. [1 ]
Park, D. [1 ]
Kang, Y. H. [1 ]
Joibi, J. C. [1 ]
Yun, M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Obesity classification; Cluster analysis; Fuzzy rule-based system; BODY-MASS INDEX; DISEASE; INDICATOR; FATNESS; RISK; FAT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Body mass index (BMI) is mostly used as a reference through its indirect measure of fat mass and can be used conveniently. Despite such reference and convenience, in accordance to previous studies done, there exist a poor degree of agreement in obesity classification when it comes to BMI and the percent body fat that was found. Together with the utility of such obesity classification which refers to predefined cut-off values of BMI was seen as controversial. This study aims to discover a new method to classify obesity by using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques and statistical methods for obesity classification with minimum number of body dimensions required for input. The performance of methods used undergo comparison in terms of accuracy and interpretability. Results have shown that fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) to be the most appropriate method amongst the rest. FRBS showed a performance of accuracy similar to other AI algorithms and discriminant analysis (DA), also showing a more stable and consistent provision of classification rules compared to the others. Concurrently, this study is suggesting the FRBS method as an obesity classification method.
引用
收藏
页码:1821 / 1825
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of clustering methods for biogeography with fossil datasets
    Vavrek, Matthew J.
    PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [43] Alcohol mortality: a comparison of spatial clustering methods
    Hanson, CE
    Wieczorek, WF
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2002, 55 (05) : 791 - 802
  • [44] A COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF 4 METHODS FOR CLUSTERING JOBS
    ZIMMERMAN, R
    JACOBS, R
    FARR, J
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1982, 6 (03) : 353 - 366
  • [45] A COMPARISON OF 4 CLUSTERING METHODS - REPLY AND REANALYSIS
    BLASHFIELD, RK
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1981, 5 (01) : 75 - 76
  • [46] A comparison of methods for clustering electrophysiological multineuron recordings
    Sim, AWK
    Jin, CT
    Chan, LW
    Leong, PHW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 20, PTS 1-6: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TOWARDS THE YEAR 2000 AND BEYOND, 1998, 20 : 1381 - 1384
  • [47] Investigating diversity of clustering methods: An empirical comparison
    Gelbard, Roy
    Goldman, Orit
    Spiegler, Israel
    DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2007, 63 (01) : 155 - 166
  • [48] Comparison of seven approaches for holter ECG clustering and classification
    Chudacek, Vaclav
    Petrik, Milan
    Georgoulas, George
    Cepek, Miroslav
    Lhotska, Lenka
    Stylios, Chrysostomos
    2007 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-16, 2007, : 3844 - 3847
  • [49] Comparison Of Linear Dimensionality Reduction Methods On Classification Methods
    Yildiz, Eray
    Sevim, Yusuf
    2016 NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ELECO), 2016, : 161 - 164
  • [50] A Comparison of Head Movement Classification Methods
    Callahan-Flintoft, Chloe
    Jensen, Emily
    Naeem, Jasim
    Nonte, Michael W.
    Madison, Anna M.
    Ries, Anthony J.
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (04)