Comparison of Clustering Methods for Obesity Classification

被引:0
|
作者
Ahn, S. H. [1 ]
Wang, C. [1 ]
Shin, G. W. [1 ]
Park, D. [1 ]
Kang, Y. H. [1 ]
Joibi, J. C. [1 ]
Yun, M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
来源
2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM) | 2018年
关键词
Obesity classification; Cluster analysis; Fuzzy rule-based system; BODY-MASS INDEX; DISEASE; INDICATOR; FATNESS; RISK; FAT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Body mass index (BMI) is mostly used as a reference through its indirect measure of fat mass and can be used conveniently. Despite such reference and convenience, in accordance to previous studies done, there exist a poor degree of agreement in obesity classification when it comes to BMI and the percent body fat that was found. Together with the utility of such obesity classification which refers to predefined cut-off values of BMI was seen as controversial. This study aims to discover a new method to classify obesity by using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques and statistical methods for obesity classification with minimum number of body dimensions required for input. The performance of methods used undergo comparison in terms of accuracy and interpretability. Results have shown that fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) to be the most appropriate method amongst the rest. FRBS showed a performance of accuracy similar to other AI algorithms and discriminant analysis (DA), also showing a more stable and consistent provision of classification rules compared to the others. Concurrently, this study is suggesting the FRBS method as an obesity classification method.
引用
收藏
页码:1821 / 1825
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On Comparison of Clustering Methods for Pharmacoepidemiological Data
    Feuillet, Fanny
    Bellanger, Lise
    Hardouin, Jean-Benoit
    Victorri-Vigneau, Caroline
    Sebille, Veronique
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2015, 25 (04) : 843 - 856
  • [22] Comparison of Selected Methods for Document Clustering
    Sevcik, Radim
    Rezankova, Hana
    Husek, Dusan
    ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT WEB MASTERING 3, 2011, 86 : 101 - 110
  • [23] Classification and Comparison of Agile Methods
    Fernandes, Joao M.
    Almeida, Mauro
    QUATIC 2010: SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE QUALITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, 2010, : 391 - 396
  • [24] Comparison of local classification methods
    Schiffner, Julia
    Weihs, Claus
    DATA ANALYSIS, MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS, 2008, : 69 - +
  • [25] A comparison of methods for Customer Classification
    Lopes, MCS
    Costa, MCA
    Ebecken, NFF
    DATA MINING, 1998, : 333 - 347
  • [26] A Comparison of Data Classification Methods
    Stefan, Raluca-Mariana
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE EMERGING MARKETS QUERIES IN FINANCE AND BUSINESS, 2012, 3 : 420 - 425
  • [27] A comparison of clustering algorithms for automatic modulation classification
    Mouton, Jacques P.
    Ferreira, Melvin
    Helberg, Albertus S. J.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2020, 151
  • [28] Comparison of clustering algorithms for analog modulation classification
    Guldemir, H
    Sengur, A
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2006, 30 (04) : 642 - 649
  • [29] Comparison of AIS and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on the classification of breast cancer and diabetes datasets
    Ozsen, Seral
    Ceylan, Rahime
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2014, 22 (05) : 1241 - 1254
  • [30] Using grid-clustering methods in data classification
    Grabusts, P
    Borisov, A
    PAR ELEC 2002: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL COMPUTING IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, : 425 - 426