Comparison of Clustering Methods for Obesity Classification

被引:0
|
作者
Ahn, S. H. [1 ]
Wang, C. [1 ]
Shin, G. W. [1 ]
Park, D. [1 ]
Kang, Y. H. [1 ]
Joibi, J. C. [1 ]
Yun, M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Obesity classification; Cluster analysis; Fuzzy rule-based system; BODY-MASS INDEX; DISEASE; INDICATOR; FATNESS; RISK; FAT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Body mass index (BMI) is mostly used as a reference through its indirect measure of fat mass and can be used conveniently. Despite such reference and convenience, in accordance to previous studies done, there exist a poor degree of agreement in obesity classification when it comes to BMI and the percent body fat that was found. Together with the utility of such obesity classification which refers to predefined cut-off values of BMI was seen as controversial. This study aims to discover a new method to classify obesity by using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques and statistical methods for obesity classification with minimum number of body dimensions required for input. The performance of methods used undergo comparison in terms of accuracy and interpretability. Results have shown that fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) to be the most appropriate method amongst the rest. FRBS showed a performance of accuracy similar to other AI algorithms and discriminant analysis (DA), also showing a more stable and consistent provision of classification rules compared to the others. Concurrently, this study is suggesting the FRBS method as an obesity classification method.
引用
收藏
页码:1821 / 1825
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of obesity classification methods among college students
    Wilson, Oliver W. A.
    Zou, Zi Hua
    Bopp, Melissa
    Bopp, Christopher M.
    [J]. OBESITY RESEARCH & CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 13 (05) : 430 - 434
  • [2] PERSONALITY CLASSIFICATION OF CONSUMERS: A COMPARISON OF VARIABLES, STANDARDIZATION AND CLUSTERING METHODS
    Cherdchu, Panat
    Chambers, Edgar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 2013, 28 (06) : 504 - 512
  • [3] COMPARISON OF METHODS OF HIERARCHICAL-CLUSTERING FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF WATER SAMPLES
    HEBISCH, R
    EMRICH, G
    [J]. CHEMISCHE TECHNIK, 1988, 40 (06): : 261 - 263
  • [4] Comparison of graph clustering methods for analyzing the mathematical subject classification codes
    Choi, Kwangju
    Lee, June-Yub
    Kim, Younjin
    Lee, Donghwan
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS FOR STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS AND METHODS, 2020, 27 (05) : 569 - 578
  • [5] Comparison of classification and clustering methods in spatial rainfall pattern recognition at Northern Iran
    Golian, Saeed
    Saghafian, Bahram
    Sheshangosht, Sara
    Ghalkhani, Hossein
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2010, 102 (3-4) : 319 - 329
  • [6] Comparison of classification and clustering methods in spatial rainfall pattern recognition at Northern Iran
    Saeed Golian
    Bahram Saghafian
    Sara Sheshangosht
    Hossein Ghalkhani
    [J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2010, 102 : 319 - 329
  • [7] Comparison of Clustering Methods in the Context of Chemical Structure Similarity Based Classification of VOCs
    Abdullah, Azian Azamimi
    Altaf-Ul-Amin, Md.
    Ono, Naoaki
    Yusuf, Nurlisa
    Zakaria, Ammar
    Nishioka, Takaaki
    Kanaya, Shigehiko
    [J]. 11TH ASIAN CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL SENSORS, 2016, 20 : 40 - 44
  • [8] Biased clustering methods for image classification
    Santos, R
    Ohashi, T
    Yoshida, T
    Ejima, T
    [J]. SIBGRAPI '98 - INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER GRAPHICS, IMAGE PROCESSING, AND VISION, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 278 - 285
  • [9] CONTAINER METHODS OF CLUSTERING AND CLASSIFICATION OF SIGNALS
    Kirichenko, N. F.
    Korlyuk, A. S.
    Kryvonos, Yu. G.
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, 2009, 45 (05) : 767 - 773
  • [10] Comparison of fuzzy clustering algorithms for classification
    Almeida, R. J.
    Sousa, J. M. C.
    [J]. 2006 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EVOLVING FUZZY SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 112 - +