ENERGY ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION IN TURKEY BY USING MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGIES

被引：0

作者：

Alcan, Pelin ^{[1
]}

Odabasi, Didem ^{[2
]}

Balin, Abit ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Istanbul Gelisim Univ, Ind Engn, Istanbul, Avcilar, Turkey

[2] Istanbul Gelisim Univ, Civil Engn, Istanbul, Avcilar, Turkey

[3] Yalova Univ, Ind Engn, Yalova, Cinarcik, Turkey

来源：

UNCERTAINTY MODELLING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING | 2016年 / 10卷

关键词：

Energy policy; AHP; VIKOR; PROMETHEE; TOPSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; FUZZY VIKOR;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

As we search to achieve sustainable development and substance, energy security and efficiency should be viewed not only from the perspective of addressing short-term challenges, but also as a necessity for long-term growth of the economy. Latterly, some articles have majored on selecting the best energy policy and arbitrating the best energy alternatives. In this paper, AHP, VIKOR, PROMETHEE and TOPSIS approaches are suggested for the selection among energy policies. The methodology is based on these four methods under a comparison. In the application of the proposed methodologies, the best energy policy is determined for Turkey.

引用

页码：627 / 631

页数：5

共 50 条

[1] THE APPLICATIONS OF ENERGY ALTERNATIVES IN TURKEY USING MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROCESSES
Balin, Abit
Alcan, Pelin
Basligil, Huseyin
[J]. UNCERTAINTY MODELING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 7 : 124 - 130
[2] Using Value-Focused Thinking and Multicriteria Decision Making to Evaluate Energy Transition Alternatives
Hoefer, Tim
von Nitzsch, Ruediger
Madlener, Reinhard
[J]. DECISION ANALYSIS, 2020, 17 (04) : 330 - 355
[3] EVALUATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATIVES USING MACBETH AND FUZZY AHP MULTICRITERIA METHODS: THE CASE OF TURKEY
Ertay, Tijen
Kahraman, Cengiz
Kaya, Ihsan
[J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2013, 19 (01) : 38 - 62
[4] HYBRID METHOD OF MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION OF DECISION ALTERNATIVES
Pankratova, N. D.
Nedashkovskaya, N. I.
[J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, 2014, 50 (05) : 701 - 711
[5] Supportiveness of Low-Carbon Energy Technology Policy Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Methodologies
Kokkinos, Konstantinos
Karayannis, Vayos
[J]. MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (07)
[6] EVALUATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATIVES USING MACBETH MULTICRITERIA METHOD
Ertay, Tijen
Kahraman, Cengiz
[J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE: FOUNDATIONS AND APPLICATIONS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL FLINS CONFERENCE, 2010, 4 : 937 - +
[7] Tribomaterial evaluation and ranking using fuzzy multicriteria decision making
Wani, A. F.
[J]. Proceedings of the 8th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Vol 3, 2006, : 987 - 993
[8] DECOMPOSITION AND COMPOSITION OF THE PROPERTIES OF ALTERNATIVES IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS
Voronin, A. N.
[J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, 2009, 45 (01) : 105 - 110
[9] Sustainability evaluation of biodiesel production using multicriteria decision-making
Mary Kay o'Connor Process Safety Center, Artie McFerrln Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas AandM University System, College Station, TX 77843-3122, United States
[J]. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy, 1 (38-46):
[10] Sustainability Evaluation of Biodiesel Production Using Multicriteria Decision-Making
Dinh, Linh T. T.
Guo, Yuyan
Mannan, M. Sam
[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2009, 28 (01) : 38 - 46

← 1 2 3 4 5 →