Sustainability Evaluation of Biodiesel Production Using Multicriteria Decision-Making

被引:61
|
作者
Dinh, Linh T. T. [1 ]
Guo, Yuyan [1 ]
Mannan, M. Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ Syst, Mary Kay OConnor Proc Safety Ctr, Artie McFerrin Dept Chem Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
sustainability; biodiesel; AHP technique; algae; jatropha; palm oil; rapeseed; soybean; BOTRYOCOCCUS-BRAUNII; OIL; HYDROCARBONS;
D O I
10.1002/ep.10335
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Higher crude-oil prices, increases in energy imports, converns about petroleum supplies, and greater recognition of environmental concequences of fossil fuels have spurred a search for alternative sources of fuel. In the aspect of choosing an appropriate source for a long-term development, it is necessary to decide which is the most sustainable. This article describes a systematic method based on Analytical Hierarchical Process technique to compare biodiesel feedstock alternatives on technical, economical, and sustainable aspects throughout life cycles of biodiesel production. Five biodiesel feedstocks which are jatropha, algae, palm oil, rapeseed, and soybean are taken into consideration in a quantified evaluation. Among these alternatives and with a recommended scoring structure, biodiesel from algae is shown in the calculation results to be the highest ranking substitute for diesel fuel due to its overalll better performance in the aspects of environment, economical, safety, raw material performance, and fuel performance. (C) 2008 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 28: 38-46, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 46
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainability evaluation of biodiesel production using multicriteria decision-making
    Mary Kay o'Connor Process Safety Center, Artie McFerrln Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas AandM University System, College Station, TX 77843-3122, United States
    [J]. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy, 1 (38-46):
  • [2] MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    HENDRIKS, MMWB
    DEBOER, JH
    SMILDE, AK
    DOORNBOS, DA
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1992, 16 (03) : 175 - 191
  • [3] MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING USING PERSONAL COMPUTERS
    LOTFI, V
    TEICH, JE
    [J]. LECTURE NOTES IN ECONOMICS AND MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS, 1991, 356 : 152 - 158
  • [4] Multicriteria Decision-Making Using Fuzzy Measures
    Yager, Ronald R.
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 46 (3-4) : 150 - 171
  • [5] Sustainability assessment of cities using multicriteria decision-making combined with deep learning methods
    Liu, Yupeng
    Wen, Xin
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2024, 111
  • [6] Proposal of Multicriteria Decision-Making Models for Biogas Production
    Yamaji, Daniela M.
    Amancio-Vieira, Saulo F.
    Fidelis, Reginaldo
    Contani, Eduardo A. do R.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (04)
  • [7] AN EXACT DECISION-MAKING IN PRODUCTION BASED ON MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION
    Tosenovsky, Filip
    [J]. METAL 2014: 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METALLURGY AND MATERIALS, 2014, : 1478 - 1484
  • [8] A toolbox for multicriteria decision-making
    Janssen, Ron
    van Herwijnen, Marjan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 6 (1-2) : 20 - 39
  • [9] Sustainability Evaluation Framework of Urban Stormwater Drainage Options for Arid Environments Using Hydraulic Modeling and Multicriteria Decision-Making
    Alhumaid, Mohammad
    Ghumman, Abul Razzaq
    Haider, Husnain
    Al-Salamah, Ibrahim Saleh
    Ghazaw, Yousry Mahmoud
    [J]. WATER, 2018, 10 (05):
  • [10] Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making
    Jingzheng Ren
    Alessandro Manzardo
    Anna Mazzi
    Filippo Zuliani
    Antonio Scipioni
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 842 - 853